Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Binding for fixed NVMEM cells defined directly as NVMEM device subnodes
has been deprecated. It has been replaced by the "fixed-layout" NVMEM
layout binding.
New syntax is meant to be clearer and should help avoiding imprecise
bindings.
NVMEM subsystem already supports the new binding. It should be a good
idea to limit support for old syntax to existing drivers that actually
support & use it (we can't break backward compatibility!). That way we
additionally encourage new bindings & drivers to ignore deprecated
binding.
It wasn't clear (to me) if rtc and w1 code actually uses old syntax
fixed cells. I enabled them to don't risk any breakage.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
[for meson-{efuse,mx-efuse}.c]
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
[for mtk-efuse.c, nvmem/core.c, nvmem-provider.h]
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
[MT8192, MT8195 Chromebooks]
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
[for microchip-otpc.c]
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
[SAMA7G5-EK]
Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020105545.216052-3-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823132744.350618-14-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
'ret' is known to be 0 here.
The expected error status is stored in 'status', so use it instead.
Also change %d in %u, because status is an u32, not a int.
Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support")
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5bc44aace2fe7e1c91d8b35c8fe31e7134ceab2c.1620406852.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When call function devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), we should use IS_ERR()
to check the return value and return PTR_ERR() if failed.
Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722100705.7772-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We've saved the double data flag in the device data, so we should
use it when programming a block.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-4-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We have some cases that will programme the eFuse block partially multiple
times, so we should allow the block to be programmed again if it was
programmed partially. But we should lock the block if the whole block
was programmed. Thus add a condition to validate if we need lock the
block or not.
Moreover we only enable the auto-check function when locking the block.
Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-3-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
According to the Spreadtrum eFuse specification, we should write 0 to
the block to trigger the lock operation.
Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support")
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The Spreadtrum eFuse controller is widely used to dump chip ID,
configuration setting, function select and so on, as well as
supporting one-time programming.
Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191029114240.14905-8-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|