diff options
| author | Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> | 2022-10-25 11:45:16 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-10-25 23:11:46 -0700 |
| commit | 271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476 (patch) | |
| tree | 556578ff32ceed2a81bfc0333a041c5fd789ff5c /kernel/bpf/syscall.c | |
| parent | f3c51fe02c55bd944662714e5b91b96dc271ad9f (diff) | |
bpf: Remove prog->active check for bpf_lsm and bpf_iter
The commit 64696c40d03c ("bpf: Add __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}_struct_ops for struct_ops trampoline")
removed prog->active check for struct_ops prog. The bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter is also using trampoline. Like struct_ops, the bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter have fixed hooks for the prog to attach. The
kernel does not call the same hook in a recursive way.
This patch also removes the prog->active check for
bpf_lsm and bpf_iter.
A later patch has a test to reproduce the recursion issue
for a sleepable bpf_lsm program.
This patch appends the '_recur' naming to the existing
enter and exit functions that track the prog->active counter.
New __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}[_sleepable] function are
added to skip the prog->active tracking. The '_struct_ops'
version is also removed.
It also moves the decision on picking the enter and exit function to
the new bpf_trampoline_{enter,exit}(). It returns the '_recur' ones
for all tracing progs to use. For bpf_lsm, bpf_iter,
struct_ops (no prog->active tracking after 64696c40d03c), and
bpf_lsm_cgroup (no prog->active tracking after 69fd337a975c7),
it will return the functions that don't track the prog->active.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 7b373a5e861f..a0b4266196a8 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -5133,13 +5133,14 @@ int kern_sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) run_ctx.bpf_cookie = 0; run_ctx.saved_run_ctx = NULL; - if (!__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(prog, &run_ctx)) { + if (!__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur(prog, &run_ctx)) { /* recursion detected */ bpf_prog_put(prog); return -EBUSY; } attr->test.retval = bpf_prog_run(prog, (void *) (long) attr->test.ctx_in); - __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(prog, 0 /* bpf_prog_run does runtime stats */, &run_ctx); + __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable_recur(prog, 0 /* bpf_prog_run does runtime stats */, + &run_ctx); bpf_prog_put(prog); return 0; #endif |