Merge tag 'hole_punch_for_v5.15-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs

Pull fs hole punching vs cache filling race fixes from Jan Kara:
 "Fix races leading to possible data corruption or stale data exposure
  in multiple filesystems when hole punching races with operations such
  as readahead.

  This is the series I was sending for the last merge window but with
  your objection fixed - now filemap_fault() has been modified to take
  invalidate_lock only when we need to create new page in the page cache
  and / or bring it uptodate"

* tag 'hole_punch_for_v5.15-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs:
  filesystems/locking: fix Malformed table warning
  cifs: Fix race between hole punch and page fault
  ceph: Fix race between hole punch and page fault
  fuse: Convert to using invalidate_lock
  f2fs: Convert to using invalidate_lock
  zonefs: Convert to using invalidate_lock
  xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
  xfs: Convert to use invalidate_lock
  xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()
  ext2: Convert to using invalidate_lock
  ext4: Convert to use mapping->invalidate_lock
  mm: Add functions to lock invalidate_lock for two mappings
  mm: Protect operations adding pages to page cache with invalidate_lock
  documentation: Sync file_operations members with reality
  mm: Fix comments mentioning i_mutex

1 files changed, 63 insertions, 58 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 990b72ae3635..f00145e1a976 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(
 
 /*
  * In addition to i_rwsem in the VFS inode, the xfs inode contains 2
- * multi-reader locks: i_mmap_lock and the i_lock.  This routine allows
+ * multi-reader locks: invalidate_lock and the i_lock.  This routine allows
  * various combinations of the locks to be obtained.
  *
  * The 3 locks should always be ordered so that the IO lock is obtained first,
@@ -140,23 +140,23 @@ xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(
  *
  * Basic locking order:
  *
- * i_rwsem -> i_mmap_lock -> page_lock -> i_ilock
+ * i_rwsem -> invalidate_lock -> page_lock -> i_ilock
  *
  * mmap_lock locking order:
  *
  * i_rwsem -> page lock -> mmap_lock
- * mmap_lock -> i_mmap_lock -> page_lock
+ * mmap_lock -> invalidate_lock -> page_lock
  *
  * The difference in mmap_lock locking order mean that we cannot hold the
- * i_mmap_lock over syscall based read(2)/write(2) based IO. These IO paths can
- * fault in pages during copy in/out (for buffered IO) or require the mmap_lock
- * in get_user_pages() to map the user pages into the kernel address space for
- * direct IO. Similarly the i_rwsem cannot be taken inside a page fault because
- * page faults already hold the mmap_lock.
+ * invalidate_lock over syscall based read(2)/write(2) based IO. These IO paths
+ * can fault in pages during copy in/out (for buffered IO) or require the
+ * mmap_lock in get_user_pages() to map the user pages into the kernel address
+ * space for direct IO. Similarly the i_rwsem cannot be taken inside a page
+ * fault because page faults already hold the mmap_lock.
  *
  * Hence to serialise fully against both syscall and mmap based IO, we need to
- * take both the i_rwsem and the i_mmap_lock. These locks should *only* be both
- * taken in places where we need to invalidate the page cache in a race
+ * take both the i_rwsem and the invalidate_lock. These locks should *only* be
+ * both taken in places where we need to invalidate the page cache in a race
  * free manner (e.g. truncate, hole punch and other extent manipulation
  * functions).
  */
@@ -188,10 +188,13 @@ xfs_ilock(
 				 XFS_IOLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
 	}
 
-	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
-	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
-		mraccess_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL) {
+		down_write_nested(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock,
+				  XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+	} else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED) {
+		down_read_nested(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock,
+				 XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
+	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
 		mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
@@ -240,10 +243,10 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL) {
-		if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_mmaplock))
+		if (!down_write_trylock(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock))
 			goto out_undo_iolock;
 	} else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED) {
-		if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_mmaplock))
+		if (!down_read_trylock(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock))
 			goto out_undo_iolock;
 	}
 
@@ -258,9 +261,9 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
 
 out_undo_mmaplock:
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
-		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);
 out_undo_iolock:
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
 		up_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
@@ -307,9 +310,9 @@ xfs_iunlock(
 		up_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);
 	else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
-		mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		up_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);
 
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
 		mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_lock);
@@ -335,7 +338,7 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
 		mrdemote(&ip->i_lock);
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
-		mrdemote(&ip->i_mmaplock);
+		downgrade_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);
 	if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
 		downgrade_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
 
@@ -343,9 +346,29 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
 }
 
 #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-int
+static inline bool
+__xfs_rwsem_islocked(
+	struct rw_semaphore	*rwsem,
+	bool			shared)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks)
+		return rwsem_is_locked(rwsem);
+
+	if (!shared)
+		return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * We are checking that the lock is held at least in shared
+	 * mode but don't care that it might be held exclusively
+	 * (i.e. shared | excl). Hence we check if the lock is held
+	 * in any mode rather than an explicit shared mode.
+	 */
+	return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, -1);
+}
+
+bool
 xfs_isilocked(
-	xfs_inode_t		*ip,
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	uint			lock_flags)
 {
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
@@ -355,20 +378,17 @@ xfs_isilocked(
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
-		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED))
-			return !!ip->i_mmaplock.mr_writer;
-		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_mmaplock.mr_lock);
+		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
+				(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED));
 	}
 
-	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
-		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
-			return !debug_locks ||
-				lockdep_is_held_type(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem, 0);
-		return rwsem_is_locked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
+	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
+		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
+				(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED));
 	}
 
 	ASSERT(0);
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -532,12 +552,10 @@ again:
 }
 
 /*
- * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time -
- * the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one type at a time. If we lock
- * more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we have
- * violated locking orders.  The iolock must be double-locked separately since
- * we use i_rwsem for that.  We now support taking one lock EXCL and the other
- * SHARED.
+ * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock ilock. The iolock and
+ * mmaplock must be double-locked separately since we use i_rwsem and
+ * invalidate_lock for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
+ * other SHARED.
  */
 void
 xfs_lock_two_inodes(
@@ -555,15 +573,8 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
 	ASSERT(hweight32(ip1_mode) == 1);
 	ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
 	ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
-	ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
-	       !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-	ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
-	       !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-	ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
-	       !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-	ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
-	       !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-
+	ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
+	ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
 	ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
 
 	if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
@@ -3741,11 +3752,8 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
 	ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	if (ip1 == ip2)
-		xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
-	else
-		xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL,
-				    ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+	filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+				    VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3755,12 +3763,9 @@ xfs_iunlock2_io_mmap(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip1,
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip2)
 {
-	bool			same_inode = (ip1 == ip2);
-
-	xfs_iunlock(ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
-	if (!same_inode)
-		xfs_iunlock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+	filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+				      VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
 	inode_unlock(VFS_I(ip2));
-	if (!same_inode)
+	if (ip1 != ip2)
 		inode_unlock(VFS_I(ip1));
 }