From f6463b0da6937e288b115d641ccd46c70fb3a4a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:12:04 +0300
Subject: ext4: nuke pdflush from comments

The pdflush thread is long gone, so this patch removes references to pdflush
from ext4 comments.

Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs')

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index bcb60d08a964..dff171c3a123 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate);
  * This function can get called via...
  *   - ext4_da_writepages after taking page lock (have journal handle)
  *   - journal_submit_inode_data_buffers (no journal handle)
- *   - shrink_page_list via pdflush (no journal handle)
+ *   - shrink_page_list via the kswapd/direct reclaim (no journal handle)
  *   - grab_page_cache when doing write_begin (have journal handle)
  *
  * We don't do any block allocation in this function. If we have page with
-- 
cgit v1.2.3