summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000
commit36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a (patch)
treed6844c991f0c06de4b66a2615259607d8349e5b3 /lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp
parentb033b03c23fb3ae066937b2ec09eb9d7a3f1d522 (diff)
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp7
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp b/lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp
index 54f0e27ce3b..1b0f359e636 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/PtrUseVisitor.cpp
@@ -16,11 +16,10 @@
using namespace llvm;
void detail::PtrUseVisitorBase::enqueueUsers(Instruction &I) {
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = I.use_begin(), UE = I.use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI) {
- if (VisitedUses.insert(&UI.getUse())) {
+ for (Use &U : I.uses()) {
+ if (VisitedUses.insert(&U)) {
UseToVisit NewU = {
- UseToVisit::UseAndIsOffsetKnownPair(&UI.getUse(), IsOffsetKnown),
+ UseToVisit::UseAndIsOffsetKnownPair(&U, IsOffsetKnown),
Offset
};
Worklist.push_back(std::move(NewU));