summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>2016-04-25 07:02:13 -0300
committerMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>2016-06-28 09:59:51 -0300
commit56967c77d4c22bb31dbf18cc058147f4df433dd7 (patch)
treef8ad6966f6d52d9728736414516f4d4e89265c1e /drivers
parentca684386e6e21ba1511061f71577cdb6c3f2b3d3 (diff)
[media] cec/TODO: add TODO file so we know why this is still in staging
Explain why cec.c is still in staging. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/media/cec/TODO27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/cec/TODO b/drivers/staging/media/cec/TODO
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a8f4b7df38c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/cec/TODO
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+The reason why cec.c is still in staging is that I would like
+to have a bit more confidence in the uABI. The kABI is fine,
+no problem there, but I would like to let the public API mature
+a bit.
+
+Once I'm confident that I didn't miss anything then the cec.c source
+can move to drivers/media and the linux/cec.h and linux/cec-funcs.h
+headers can move to uapi/linux and added to uapi/linux/Kbuild to make
+them public.
+
+Hopefully this will happen later in 2016.
+
+Other TODOs:
+
+- Add a flag to inhibit passing CEC RC messages to the rc subsystem.
+ Applications should be able to choose this when calling S_LOG_ADDRS.
+- Convert cec.txt to sphinx.
+- If the reply field of cec_msg is set then when the reply arrives it
+ is only sent to the filehandle that transmitted the original message
+ and not to any followers. Should this behavior change or perhaps
+ controlled through a cec_msg flag?
+- Should CEC_LOG_ADDR_TYPE_SPECIFIC be replaced by TYPE_2ND_TV and TYPE_PROCESSOR?
+ And also TYPE_SWITCH and TYPE_CDC_ONLY in addition to the TYPE_UNREGISTERED?
+ This should give the framework more information about the device type
+ since SPECIFIC and UNREGISTERED give no useful information.
+
+Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>