diff options
author | Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> | 2016-05-27 01:56:39 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> | 2016-05-29 18:35:29 -0700 |
commit | 1338bfa81c6eddc66f07c15225c3feff062182ce (patch) | |
tree | 4335579f8a41babfdfad9b0e2fb904e0ff1e7873 /test/touch.c | |
parent | 8b9b4387e8473810f6174519ee76818fcaae725d (diff) |
test: Make touch test reflect new ability to realloc touch array [v2]
Threaded input allows the input code to call malloc while processing
events. In this case, that's in the middle of processing touch events
and needing to resize the touch buffer.
This test was expecting the old behaviour where touch points would get
dropped if the buffer was full. The fix is to check for the new
behaviour instead.
[v2]
* make sure two finding two equivalent touches return the same touch
object
* check to make sure the queue resizes by the expected amount
Changes provided by Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/touch.c')
-rw-r--r-- | test/touch.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/test/touch.c b/test/touch.c index 981c694b6..1364d615c 100644 --- a/test/touch.c +++ b/test/touch.c @@ -58,9 +58,8 @@ touch_grow_queue(void) dev.last.touches[i].client_id = i * 2; } - /* no more space, should've scheduled a workproc */ - assert(TouchBeginDDXTouch(&dev, 1234) == NULL); - ProcessWorkQueue(); + /* no more space, should've reallocated and succeeded */ + assert(TouchBeginDDXTouch(&dev, 1234) != NULL); new_size = size + size / 2 + 1; assert(dev.last.num_touches == new_size); @@ -74,8 +73,12 @@ touch_grow_queue(void) assert(t->client_id == i * 2); } + assert(dev.last.touches[size].active == TRUE); + assert(dev.last.touches[size].ddx_id == 1234); + assert(dev.last.touches[size].client_id == 1); + /* make sure those are zero-initialized */ - for (i = size; i < new_size; i++) { + for (i = size + 1; i < new_size; i++) { DDXTouchPointInfoPtr t = &dev.last.touches[i]; assert(t->active == FALSE); @@ -90,7 +93,7 @@ static void touch_find_ddxid(void) { DeviceIntRec dev; - DDXTouchPointInfoPtr ti; + DDXTouchPointInfoPtr ti, ti2; ValuatorClassRec val; TouchClassRec touch; int size = 5; @@ -136,22 +139,20 @@ touch_find_ddxid(void) for (i = 0; i < size; i++) dev.last.touches[i].active = TRUE; - /* Try to create more, fail */ - ti = TouchFindByDDXID(&dev, 30, TRUE); - assert(ti == NULL); + /* Try to create more, succeed */ ti = TouchFindByDDXID(&dev, 30, TRUE); - assert(ti == NULL); - /* make sure we haven't resized, we're in the signal handler */ - assert(dev.last.num_touches == size); + assert(ti != NULL); + ti2 = TouchFindByDDXID(&dev, 30, TRUE); + assert(ti == ti); + /* make sure we have resized */ + assert(dev.last.num_touches == 8); /* EQ grows from 5 to 8 */ /* stop one touchpoint, try to create, succeed */ dev.last.touches[2].active = FALSE; - ti = TouchFindByDDXID(&dev, 30, TRUE); + ti = TouchFindByDDXID(&dev, 35, TRUE); assert(ti == &dev.last.touches[2]); - /* but still grow anyway */ - ProcessWorkQueue(); ti = TouchFindByDDXID(&dev, 40, TRUE); - assert(ti == &dev.last.touches[size]); + assert(ti == &dev.last.touches[size+1]); free(dev.name); } |