/* * Copyright © 2006 Red Hat, Inc. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software * and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without * fee, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies * and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice * appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of * Red Hat, Inc. not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to * distribution of the software without specific, written prior * permission. Red Hat, Inc. makes no representations about the * suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as * is" without express or implied warranty. * * RED HAT, INC. DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS * SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND * FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL RED HAT, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, * INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER * RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION * OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR * IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. * * Author: Carl D. Worth */ #include "cairo-test.h" #include /* Bug history * * 2006-01-07 Jon Hellan * * Jon opened the following bug report: * * _XError from XRenderCompositeText8 * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5528 * * 2006-03-02 Carl Worth * * I wrote this test case to demonstrate the bug. * * Approach: * * Draw 65535 glyphs white-on-white all on top of each other. * * Rationale: * * The number 65535 comes from the original bug report. * * I would use cairo_show_text with a long string of 'x's say, * but then the surface would need to be enormous to contain * them. A smaller surface could be used, but I fear that at some * point the off-surface glyph drawing would be optimized away * and not exercise the bug. * * So, to keep the surface size under control, I use * cairo_show_glyphs which allows me to place the glyphs all on * top of each other. But, since cairo doesn't provide any * character-to-glyphs mapping, I can't get a reliable glyph * index (for character 'x' for example). So I just "guess" a * glyph index and use white-on-white drawing to ignore the * result. (I don't care what's drawn---I just want to ensure * that things don't crash.) * * Status: I replicated bug. The largest value of NUM_GLYPHS for * which I saw success is 21842. */ #define TEXT_SIZE 12 #define NUM_GLYPHS 65535 /* This is the index into the font for what glyph we'll draw. Since we * don't guarantee we'll get any particular font, we can't relibably * get any particular glyph. But we don't care what we draw anyway, * (see discussion of white-on-white drawing above). For what it's * worth, this appears to be giving me 'M' with Bitstream Vera * Sans Mono. */ #define GLYPH_INDEX 48 static cairo_test_draw_function_t draw; cairo_test_t test = { "show-glyphs-many", "Test that cairo_show_glyps works when handed 'many' glyphs", 9, 11, draw }; static cairo_test_status_t draw (cairo_t *cr, int width, int height) { cairo_glyph_t glyphs[NUM_GLYPHS]; int i; /* Initialize our giant array of glyphs. */ for (i=0; i < NUM_GLYPHS; i++) { glyphs[i].index = GLYPH_INDEX; glyphs[i].x = 1.0; glyphs[i].y = height - 1; } /* Paint white background. */ cairo_set_source_rgb (cr, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0); /* white */ cairo_paint (cr); cairo_select_font_face (cr, "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono", CAIRO_FONT_SLANT_NORMAL, CAIRO_FONT_WEIGHT_NORMAL); cairo_set_font_size (cr, TEXT_SIZE); cairo_show_glyphs (cr, glyphs, NUM_GLYPHS); return CAIRO_TEST_SUCCESS; } int main (void) { return cairo_test (&test); }