Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Handling clip as part of the surface state, as opposed to being part of
the operation state, is cumbersome and a hindrance to providing true proxy
surface support. For example, the clip must be copied from the surface
onto the fallback image, but this was forgotten causing undue hassle in
each backend. Another example is the contortion the meta surface
endures to ensure the clip is correctly recorded. By contrast passing the
clip along with the operation is quite simple and enables us to write
generic handlers for providing surface wrappers. (And in the future, we
should be able to write more esoteric wrappers, e.g. automatic 2x FSAA,
trivially.)
In brief, instead of the surface automatically applying the clip before
calling the backend, the backend can call into a generic helper to apply
clipping. For raster surfaces, clip regions are handled automatically as
part of the composite interface. For vector surfaces, a clip helper is
introduced to replay and callback into an intersect_clip_path() function
as necessary.
Whilst this is not primarily a performance related change (the change
should just move the computation of the clip from the moment it is applied
by the user to the moment it is required by the backend), it is important
to track any potential regression:
ppc:
Speedups
========
image-rgba evolution-20090607-0 1026085.22 0.18% -> 672972.07 0.77%: 1.52x speedup
▌
image-rgba evolution-20090618-0 680579.98 0.12% -> 573237.66 0.16%: 1.19x speedup
▎
image-rgba swfdec-fill-rate-4xaa-0 460296.92 0.36% -> 407464.63 0.42%: 1.13x speedup
▏
image-rgba swfdec-fill-rate-2xaa-0 128431.95 0.47% -> 115051.86 0.42%: 1.12x speedup
▏
Slowdowns
=========
image-rgba firefox-periodic-table-0 56837.61 0.78% -> 66055.17 3.20%: 1.09x slowdown
▏
|
|
Since there is an implicit precedence in the ranking of the analysis
return codes, provide a function to centralize the logic within the
analysis surface and isolate the backends from the complexity.
|
|
It creates a surface that does nothing. This can be used with
cairo-analysis-surface, to compute bounds of cairo drawings without doing any
actual drawings.
|
|
The functionality was there. Just add getter/setter for the ctm.
|
|
The analysis surface will calculated the tight bounding box for each
page. A new paginated-surface backend function set_bounding_box() has
been added for passing the page bounding box to the target surface at
the end of the analysis phase.
The changes to the PS file when EPS is enabled are:
- Add EPS header
- Use tight bounding box instead of page size
- Use save/restore to ensure PS interpreter is left in the same state
|
|
The analysis surface now keeps track of two regions: supported
operations, and unsupported operations. If the target surface returns
CAIRO_INT_STATUS_FLATTEN_TRANSPARENCY, the analysis surface will check
if any previous operation intersects with this operation. If there is
nothing previously drawn under the operation, the status is changed to
supported.
The meta surface has two new functions:
_cairo_meta_surface_replay_region()
_cairo_meta_surface_replay_and_create_regions()
During the analysis stage, the paginated surface replays the meta
surface using _cairo_meta_surface_replay_and_create_regions(). The
return status from each analyzed operation is saved in the meta
surface. The _cairo_meta_surface_replay_region() function allows only
operations from either the supported or unsupported region to be
replayed. This allows the paginated surface to replay only the
supported operations before emitting a fallback image for each
rectangle in the unsupported region.
|
|
Insulate region-using code from implementation details;
at some point we'll want to switch to using 32-bit regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|