summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spec/Channel_Interface_Conference1.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/Channel_Interface_Conference1.xml')
-rw-r--r--spec/Channel_Interface_Conference1.xml628
1 files changed, 628 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/spec/Channel_Interface_Conference1.xml b/spec/Channel_Interface_Conference1.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..41a833c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/Channel_Interface_Conference1.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,628 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" ?>
+<node name="/Channel_Interface_Conference1"
+ xmlns:tp="http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/DbusSpec#extensions-v0">
+ <tp:copyright>Copyright © 2009 Collabora Limited</tp:copyright>
+ <tp:copyright>Copyright © 2009 Nokia Corporation</tp:copyright>
+ <tp:license xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
+ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.</p>
+
+ <p>This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ Lesser General Public License for more details.</p>
+
+ <p>You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
+ Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+ 02110-1301, USA.</p>
+ </tp:license>
+ <interface
+ name="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface.Conference1">
+ <tp:added version="0.19.13">(as stable API)</tp:added>
+ <tp:requires interface="im.telepathy1.Channel"/>
+ <tp:requires
+ interface="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface.Group1"/>
+
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>An interface for multi-user conference channels that can "continue
+ from" one or more individual channels. This could be used to invite
+ other contacts to an existing 1-1 text conversation, combine two phone
+ calls into one conference call, and so on, with roughly the same API in
+ each case.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>This interface addresses freedesktop.org <a
+ href="http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24906">bug
+ #24906</a> (GSM-compatible conference calls) and <a
+ href="http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24939">bug
+ #24939</a> (upgrading calls and chats to multi-user).
+ See those bugs for more rationale and use cases.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>Existing channels are upgraded by requesting a new channel of the same
+ <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel">ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref>,
+ listing the channels to be merged into the new conference in the
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref> property of the request.
+ If <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> and
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref> are
+ <var>Allowed_Properties</var> in <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Connection.Interface.Requests">RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref>,
+ ad-hoc conferences to a set of contacts may be created by requesting a
+ channel, specifying
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> and/or
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref> to be the contacts in
+ question. A request may specify these alongside
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>, to simultaneously
+ upgrade a channel to a conference and invite others to join it.</p>
+
+ <p>Channels with this interface MAY also implement <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace='imt1.Channel.Interface'>MergeableConference1</tp:dbus-ref>
+ to support merging more 1-1 channels into an ongoing conference.
+ Similarly, 1-1 channels MAY implement <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace='imt1.Channel.Interface'>Splittable1</tp:dbus-ref> to
+ support being broken out of a Conference channel.</p>
+
+ <p>The <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface"
+ >Group1</tp:dbus-ref> interface on Conference channels MAY use
+ channel-specific handles for participants; clients SHOULD support
+ both Conferences that have channel-specific handles, and those that
+ do not.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>In the GSM case, the Conference's Group interface MAY have
+ channel-specific handles, to represent the fact that the same
+ phone number may be in a conference twice (for instance, it could be
+ the number of a corporate switchboard).</p>
+
+ <p>In the XMPP case, the Conference's Group interface SHOULD have
+ channel-specific handles, to reflect the fact that the participants
+ have MUC-specific identities, and the user might also be able to see
+ their global identities, or not.</p>
+
+ <p>In most other cases, including MSN and link-local XMPP, the
+ Conference's Group interface SHOULD NOT have channel-specific
+ handles, since users' identities are always visible.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>Connection managers implementing channels with this interface
+ MUST NOT allow the object paths of channels that could be merged
+ into a Conference to be re-used, unless the channel re-using the
+ object path is equivalent to the channel that previously used it.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>If you upgrade some channels into a conference, and then close
+ the original channels, <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>
+ (which is immutable) will contain paths to channels which no longer
+ exist. This implies that you should not re-use channel object paths,
+ unless future incarnations of the path are equivalent.</p>
+
+ <p>For instance, on protocols where you can only have
+ zero or one 1-1 text channels with Emily at one time, it would
+ be OK to re-use the same object path for every 1-1 text channel
+ with Emily; but on protocols where this is not true, it would
+ be misleading.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <h4>Examples of usage</h4>
+
+ <p>A pair of 1-1 GSM calls <var>C1</var> and <var>C2</var> can be merged
+ into a single conference call by calling:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code><tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Connection.Interface.Requests">CreateChannel</tp:dbus-ref>({
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel">ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref>: ...Call,
+ ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C1, C2]
+ })</code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>which returns a new channel <var>Cn</var> implementing the conference
+ interface. (As a quirk of GSM, both 1-1 will cease to function normally
+ until they are <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="imt1.Channel.Interface.Splittable1">Split</tp:dbus-ref>
+ from the conference, or the conference ends.)</p>
+
+ <p>An XMPP 1-1 conversation <var>C3</var> (with
+ <tt>chris@example.com</tt>, say) can be continued in a newly created
+ multi-user chatroom by calling:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code>CreateChannel({
+ ...ChannelType: ...Text,
+ ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C3]
+ })</code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>Or, to invite <tt>emily@example.net</tt> to join the newly-created MUC
+ at the same time:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code>CreateChannel({
+ ...ChannelType: ...Text,
+ ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C3],
+ ...<tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref>: ['emily@example.net']
+ })</code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>To continue <var>C3</var> in a particular multi-user
+ chatroom (rather than the implementation inventing a unique name for
+ the room), call:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code><tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Connection.Interface.Requests">EnsureChannel</tp:dbus-ref>({
+ ...ChannelType: ...Text,
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel">TargetHandleType</tp:dbus-ref>: ...Room,
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel">TargetID</tp:dbus-ref>: 'telepathy@conf.example.com',
+ ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C3]
+ })</code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>Note the use of EnsureChannel — if a channel for
+ <tt>telepathy@conf.example.com</tt> is already open, this SHOULD be
+ equivalent to inviting <tt>chris@example.com</tt> to the existing
+ channel.</p>
+
+ <p>In the above cases, the text channel <var>C3</var> SHOULD remain open
+ and fully functional (until explicitly closed by a client); new
+ incoming 1-1 messages from <tt>chris@example.com</tt> SHOULD appear in
+ <var>C3</var>, and messages sent using <var>C3</var> MUST be relayed
+ only to <tt>chris@example.com</tt>.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>If there is an open 1-1 text channel with a contact, in every
+ other situation new messages will appear in that channel. Given
+ that the old channel remains open — which is the least surprising
+ behaviour, and eases us towards a beautiful world where channels
+ never close themselves — it stands to reason that it should be
+ where new messages from Chris should appear. On MSN, creating a
+ conference from <var>C3</var> should migrate the underlying
+ switchboard from <var>C3</var> to the new channel; this is an
+ implementation detail, and should not affect the representation on
+ D-Bus. With a suitable change of terminology, Skype has the same
+ behaviour.</p>
+
+ <p>If the current handler of that channel doesn't want this to happen
+ (maybe it transformed the existing tab into the group chat window,
+ and so there'd be no UI element still around to show new messages),
+ then it should just <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel">Close</tp:dbus-ref> the
+ old 1-1 channel; it'll respawn if necessary.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>Either of the XMPP cases could work for Call channels, to
+ upgrade from 1-1 Jingle to multi-user Jingle. Any of the XMPP cases
+ could in principle work for link-local XMPP (XEP-0174).</p>
+
+ <p>XMPP and MSN do not natively have a concept of merging two or more
+ channels C1, C2... into one channel, Cn. However, the GSM-style
+ merging API can be supported on XMPP and MSN, as an API short-cut
+ for upgrading C1 into a conference Cn (which invites the
+ TargetHandle of C1 into Cn), then immediately inviting the
+ TargetHandle of C2, the TargetHandle of C3, etc. into Cn as well.</p>
+
+ <h4>Sample <tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Connection.Interface.Requests'
+ >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref></h4>
+
+ <p>A GSM connection might advertise the following channel class for
+ conference calls:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code>
+( Fixed = {<br/>
+    ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel'>ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel.Type'>Call1</tp:dbus-ref><br/>
+  },<br/>
+  Allowed = [ <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel.Type.Call1'
+ >InitialAudio</tp:dbus-ref>
+ ]<br/>
+)
+ </code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>This indicates support for starting audio-only conference calls by
+ merging two or more existing channels (since
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> and
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref> are not allowed).</p>
+
+ <p>An XMPP connection might advertise the following classes for ad-hoc
+ multi-user text chats:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code>
+( Fixed = {<br/>
+    ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel'>ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel.Type'>Text</tp:dbus-ref><br/>
+  },<br/>
+  Allowed = [ <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:member-ref>InvitationMessage</tp:member-ref>
+ ]<br/>
+),<br/>
+( Fixed = {<br/>
+    ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel'>ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel.Type'>Text</tp:dbus-ref>,<br/>
+    ...<tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel'>TargetHandleType</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ Room<br/>
+  },<br/>
+  Allowed = [ <tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel'>TargetHandle</tp:dbus-ref>,
+ <tp:dbus-ref namespace='imt1.Channel'>TargetID</tp:dbus-ref>,<br/>
+              <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref>,
+ <tp:member-ref>InvitationMessage</tp:member-ref>
+ ]<br/>
+)
+ </code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>The first class indicates support for starting ad-hoc (nameless) chat
+ rooms, upgraded from existing 1-1 channels and/or inviting new
+ contacts, along with a message to be sent along with the invitations.
+ The second indicates support for upgrading to a particular named chat
+ room.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+
+ <property name="Channels" tp:name-for-bindings="Channels"
+ access="read" type="ao">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>The individual <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1">Channel</tp:dbus-ref>s that
+ are continued by this conference, which have the same <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel"
+ >ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref> as this one, but with <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel"
+ >TargetHandleType</tp:dbus-ref> = CONTACT.</p>
+
+ <p>This property MUST NOT be requestable; instead, the
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref> property may be
+ specified when requesting a channel.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>This is consistent with requesting
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> and
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref>, rather than
+ requesting <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface">Group1.Members</tp:dbus-ref>
+ and some hypothetical ID version of that property.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>Change notification is via the
+ <tp:member-ref>ChannelMerged</tp:member-ref> and
+ <tp:member-ref>ChannelRemoved</tp:member-ref> signals.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </property>
+
+ <signal name="ChannelMerged" tp:name-for-bindings="Channel_Merged">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>Emitted when a new channel is added to the value of
+ <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+
+ <arg name="Channel" type="o">
+ <tp:docstring>The channel that was added to
+ <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</tp:docstring>
+ </arg>
+
+ <arg name="Channel_Specific_Handle" type="u" tp:type="Contact_Handle">
+ <tp:docstring>A new channel-specific handle for the <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="imt1.Channel">TargetHandle</tp:dbus-ref> of
+ <var>Channel</var>, as will appear in
+ <tp:member-ref>OriginalChannels</tp:member-ref>, or <tt>0</tt> if a
+ global handle is used for
+ <var>Channel</var>'s TargetHandle on the <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="imt1.Channel.Interface">Group1</tp:dbus-ref> interface
+ of this channel.</tp:docstring>
+ </arg>
+
+ <arg name="Properties" type="a{sv}"
+ tp:type="Qualified_Property_Value_Map">
+ <tp:docstring><var>Channel</var>'s immutable properties.</tp:docstring>
+ </arg>
+ </signal>
+
+ <signal name="ChannelRemoved" tp:name-for-bindings="Channel_Removed">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>Emitted when a channel is removed from the value of
+ <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>, either because it closed
+ or because it was split using the <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface"
+ >Splittable1.Split</tp:dbus-ref> method.</p>
+
+ <p>If a channel is removed because it was closed, <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace='imt1.Channel'>Closed</tp:dbus-ref> should be emitted
+ before this signal.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+
+ <arg name="Channel" type="o">
+ <tp:docstring>The channel that was removed from
+ <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</tp:docstring>
+ </arg>
+
+ <arg name="Details" type="a{sv}" tp:type="String_Variant_Map">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ Additional information about the removal, which may include
+ the same well-known keys as the Details argument of
+ <tp:dbus-ref namespace="imt1.Channel.Interface.Group1"
+ >MembersChanged</tp:dbus-ref>, with the same semantics.
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </arg>
+ </signal>
+
+ <property name="InitialChannels" tp:name-for-bindings="Initial_Channels"
+ access="read" type="ao" tp:immutable="yes" tp:requestable="yes">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>The initial value of <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</p>
+
+ <p>This property SHOULD be requestable. Omitting it from a request is
+ equivalent to providing it with an empty list as value. Requests
+ where its value has at least two channel paths SHOULD be expected to
+ succeed on any implementation of this interface. If
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> and
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref> are
+ <var>Allowed_Properties</var> in <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace='imt1.Connection.Interface.Requests'
+ >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref>, then requests with zero
+ or one channel paths SHOULD also succeed; otherwise, clients SHOULD
+ NOT make requests with zero or one paths for this property.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>In GSM, a pair of calls can be merged into a conference, but you
+ can't start a conference call from zero or one existing calls. In
+ XMPP and MSN, you can create a new chatroom, or upgrade one 1-1
+ channel into a chatroom; however, on these protocols, it is also
+ possible to fake GSM-style merging by upgrading the first channel,
+ then inviting the targets of all the other channels into it.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>If possible, the <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>' states SHOULD
+ NOT be altered by merging them into a conference. However, depending on
+ the protocol, the Channels MAY be placed in a "frozen" state by placing
+ them in this property's value or by calling
+ <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface"
+ >MergeableConference1.Merge</tp:dbus-ref> on them.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>In Jingle, nothing special will happen to merged calls. UIs MAY
+ automatically place calls on hold before merging them, if that is
+ the desired behaviour; this SHOULD always work. Not doing
+ an implicit hold/unhold seems to preserve least-astonishment.</p>
+
+ <p>In GSM, the calls that are merged go into a state similar to
+ Hold, but they cannot be unheld, only split from the conference
+ call using <tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1"
+ >Channel.Interface.Splittable1.Split</tp:dbus-ref>.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>Depending on the protocol, it might be signalled to remote users
+ that this channel is a continuation of all the requested channels,
+ or that it is only a continuation of the first channel in the
+ list.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>In MSN, the conference steals the underlying switchboard (protocol
+ construct) from one of its component channels, so the conference
+ appears to remote users to be a continuation of that channel and no
+ other. The connection manager has to make some arbitrary choice, so
+ we arbitrarily mandate that it SHOULD choose the first channel in
+ the list as the one to continue.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </property>
+
+ <property name="InitialInviteeHandles"
+ tp:name-for-bindings="Initial_Invitee_Handles"
+ access="read" type="au" tp:type="Contact_Handle[]" tp:immutable="yes"
+ tp:requestable="yes">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>A list of additional contacts invited to this conference when it
+ was created.</p>
+
+ <p>If it is possible to invite new contacts when creating a conference
+ (as opposed to merging several channels into one new conference
+ channel), this property SHOULD be requestable, and appear in the allowed
+ properties in <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Connection.Interface.Requests"
+ >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref>. Otherwise, this property
+ SHOULD NOT be requestable, and its value SHOULD always be the empty
+ list.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>On GSM you have to place a 1-1 call before you can merge it into a
+ conference; on the other hand, you can invite new contacts to XMPP
+ Muji calls and XMPP/MSN/Skype ad-hoc chat rooms without starting a
+ 1-1 channel with them first.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>If included in a request, the given contacts are automatically
+ invited into the new channel, as if they had been added with
+ <tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface"
+ >Group1.AddMembers</tp:dbus-ref>(InitialInviteeHandles,
+ <tp:member-ref>InvitationMessage</tp:member-ref>) immediately after
+ the channel was created.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>This is a simple convenience API for the common case that a UI
+ upgrades a 1-1 chat to a multi-user chat solely in order to invite
+ someone else to participate.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>If the local user was not the initiator of this channel, the
+ <tp:dbus-ref namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface"
+ >Group1.SelfHandle</tp:dbus-ref> SHOULD appear in the value of this
+ property, together with any other contacts invited at the same time
+ (if that information is known).</p>
+
+ <p>InitialInviteeHandles, InitialInviteeIDs and InitialChannels MAY be
+ combined in a single request.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>For example, if you have a 1-1 channel C1 with Rob, and you want
+ to invite Sjoerd to join the discussion, you can do so by
+ requesting a channel with InitialChannels=[C1] and
+ InitialInviteeHandles=[sjoerd],
+ or InitialChannels=[C1] and
+ InitialInviteeIDs=["sjoerd@example.com"].</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>If a request includes some combination of InitialInviteeHandles,
+ InitialInviteeIDs and InitialChannels, then the value of
+ InitialInviteeHandles on the resulting channel SHOULD be the union of
+ the handles from InitialInviteeHandles, the handles corresponding
+ to the InitialInviteeIDs, and the target handles of the
+ InitialChannels, with any duplicate handles removed. Because this
+ property is immutable, its value SHOULD be computed before the
+ channel is announced via the NewChannels signal.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>This simplifies identification of new channels in clients - they
+ only have to look at one of the properties, not both. For example,
+ after either of the requests mentioned above, the NewChannels
+ signal would announce the channel with InitialChannels=[C1],
+ InitialInviteeHandles=[rob, sjoerd], and
+ InitialInviteeIDs=["rob@example.net", "sjoerd.example.com"].</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </property>
+
+ <property name="InitialInviteeIDs"
+ tp:name-for-bindings="Initial_Invitee_IDs"
+ access="read" type="as" tp:immutable="yes" tp:requestable="yes">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>A list of additional contacts invited to this conference when it
+ was created.</p>
+
+ <p>This property SHOULD be requestable if and only if
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> is requestable.
+ Its semantics are the same, except that it takes a list of the
+ string representations of contact handles; invitations are sent to
+ any contact present in either or both of these properties.</p>
+
+ <p>When a channel is created, the values of InitialInviteeHandles and
+ InitialInviteeIDs MUST correspond to each other. In particular, this
+ means that the value of InitialInviteeIDs will include the TargetID
+ of each channel in InitialChannels, and the ID corresponding to each
+ handle in InitialInviteeHandles.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </property>
+
+ <property name="InvitationMessage" tp:name-for-bindings="Invitation_Message"
+ access="read" type="s" tp:immutable="yes" tp:requestable="yes">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>The message that was sent to the
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> when they were
+ invited.</p>
+
+ <p>This property SHOULD be requestable, and appear in the allowed
+ properties in <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Connection.Interface.Requests"
+ >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref>, in protocols where
+ invitations can have an accompanying text message.</p>
+
+ <tp:rationale>
+ <p>This allows invitations with a message to be sent when using
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> or
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref>.</p>
+ </tp:rationale>
+
+ <p>If the local user was not the initiator of this channel, the
+ message with which they were invited (if any) SHOULD appear in the
+ value of this property.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </property>
+
+ <property name="OriginalChannels" tp:name-for-bindings="Original_Channels"
+ type="a{uo}" tp:type="Channel_Originator_Map"
+ access="read">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>On GSM conference calls, it is possible to have the same phone
+ number in a conference twice; for instance, it could be the number of
+ a corporate switchboard. This is represented using channel-specific
+ handles; whether or not a channel uses channel-specific handles is
+ reported in <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace='imt1.Channel.Interface'>Group1.GroupFlags</tp:dbus-ref>.
+ The <tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="im.telepathy1.Channel.Interface">Group1.HandleOwners</tp:dbus-ref>
+ property specifies the mapping from opaque channel-specific handles
+ to actual numbers; this property specifies the original 1-1 channel
+ corresponding to each channel-specific handle in the conference.</p>
+
+ <p>In protocols where this situation cannot arise, such as XMPP,
+ this property MAY remain empty.</p>
+
+ <p>For example, consider this situation:</p>
+
+ <ol>
+ <li>Place a call (with path <tt>/call/to/simon</tt>) to the contact
+ <tt>+441234567890</tt> (which is assigned the handle <var>h</var>,
+ say), and ask to be put through to Simon McVittie;</li>
+ <li>Put that call on hold;</li>
+ <li>Place another call (with path <tt>/call/to/jonny</tt>) to
+ <tt>+441234567890</tt>, and ask to be put
+ through to Jonny Lamb;</li>
+ <li>Request a new channel with
+ <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>:
+ <tt>['/call/to/simon', '/call/to/jonny']</tt>.</li>
+ </ol>
+
+ <p>The new channel will have the following properties, for some handles
+ <var>s</var> and <var>j</var>:</p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <code>{<br/>
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="imt1.Channel.Interface">Group1.GroupFlags</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ Channel_Specific_Handles | (other flags),<br/>
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="imt1.Channel.Interface">Group1.Members</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ [self_handle, s, j],<br/>
+ ...<tp:dbus-ref
+ namespace="imt1.Channel.Interface">Group1.HandleOwners</tp:dbus-ref>:
+ { s: h, j: h },<br/>
+ ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>:
+ ['/call/to/simon', '/call/to/jonny'],<br/>
+ ...<tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>:
+ ['/call/to/simon', '/call/to/jonny'],<br/>
+ ...<tp:member-ref>OriginalChannels</tp:member-ref>:
+ { s: '/call/to/simon', j: '/call/to/jonny' },<br/>
+ # ...standard properties like ChannelType: Group elided...<br/>
+ }</code>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>Change notification is via the
+ <tp:member-ref>ChannelMerged</tp:member-ref> and
+ <tp:member-ref>ChannelRemoved</tp:member-ref> signals: if
+ <var>Channel_Specific_Handle</var> in the former is non-zero, this
+ property SHOULD be updated to map that handle to the merged channel's
+ path.</p>
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </property>
+
+ <tp:mapping name="Channel_Originator_Map">
+ <tp:member name="Channel_Specific_Handle" type="u" tp:type="Contact_Handle">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ A channel-specific handle for a participant in this conference.
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </tp:member>
+ <tp:member name="Original_Channel" type="o">
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ The object path of <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>
+ representing the original 1-1 channel with
+ <var>Channel_Specific_Handle</var>.
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </tp:member>
+
+ <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ A mapping from members of a conference to the original 1-1 channel with
+ that contact, if any. See
+ <tp:member-ref>OriginalChannels</tp:member-ref> for details.
+ </tp:docstring>
+ </tp:mapping>
+ </interface>
+</node>