diff options
| author | Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> | 2016-04-12 15:51:55 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> | 2016-04-13 15:34:51 +0300 |
| commit | ce81a65c79d6012a384563caf76d47e28947a347 (patch) | |
| tree | c59365e9a7c81d279139b6ed86bed4d16b10fa2e | |
| parent | 97ea6be161c55dec896b65c95157d953c330ae05 (diff) | |
drm/i915: Adjust size of PIPE_CONTROL used for gen8 render seqno write
We started to use PIPE_CONTROL to write render ring seqno in order to
combat seqno write vs interrupt generation problems. This was introduced
by commit 7c17d377374d ("drm/i915: Use ordered seqno write interrupt
generation on gen8+ execlists").
On gen8+ size of PIPE_CONTROL with Post Sync Operation should be
6 dwords. When we're using older 5-dword variant it's possible to
observe inconsistent values written by PIPE_CONTROL with Post
Sync Operation from user batches, resulting in rendering corruptions.
v2: Fix BAT failures
v3: Comments on alignment and thrashing high dword of seqno (Chris)
v4: Updated commit msg (Mika)
Testcase: igt/gem_pipe_control_store_loop/*-qword-write
Issue: VIZ-7393
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460469115-26002-1-git-send-email-michal.winiarski@intel.com
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 2f627fcb093e..5e08ea5aa6d1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -1954,15 +1954,18 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf; int ret; - ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 6 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS); + ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 8 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS); if (ret) return ret; + /* We're using qword write, seqno should be aligned to 8 bytes. */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX & 1); + /* w/a for post sync ops following a GPGPU operation we * need a prior CS_STALL, which is emitted by the flush * following the batch. */ - intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(5)); + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, (PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL | @@ -1970,7 +1973,10 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, hws_seqno_address(request->engine)); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, i915_gem_request_get_seqno(request)); + /* We're thrashing one dword of HWS. */ + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_USER_INTERRUPT); + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP); return intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(request); } |