| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Due to how alignas is defined, it itsn't allowed to use it on a struct,
it needs to be used on the first member instead. So move the declaration
in those cases.
This still leaves the ALIGN16 macro using compiler-specific directives,
because it's a lot of work to untangle the above. This probably deserves
its own MR.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Natalie <jenatali@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/16908>
|
|
This reworks the data structure a bit and, in my view, simplifies it.
Instead of each node having a header which has the node level in it, we
use the bottom 6 bits of the pointer for that. This requires us to
allocate with the os_malloc/free_aligned helpers (which call into
posix_memalign on Linux) but cache-line aligning our allocations is
actually probably a good thing given that we're doing atomics on them.
The primary advantages to doing this is that it changes the number of
memory accesses per tree level from 2 to 1 when walking the tree because
we no longer have to look at node->level.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4228>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4228>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
|
