diff options
author | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> | 2017-07-07 07:44:59 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2017-07-10 13:18:07 +0200 |
commit | 51b0a488882328f8f02519bb47ca7e0e7fbe12ff (patch) | |
tree | 36257cf2221ea7e4e54ab7deae446d02c46f326c /block/commit.c | |
parent | c00716beb30ba996bd6fdfd5f41bb07e4414144f (diff) |
block: Make bdrv_is_allocated_above() byte-based
We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use
values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is possible
that byte-based values will let us be more precise about allocation
at the end of an unaligned file that can do byte-based access.
Changing the signature of the function to use int64_t *pnum ensures
that the compiler enforces that all callers are updated. For now,
the io.c layer still assert()s that all callers are sector-aligned,
but that can be relaxed when a later patch implements byte-based
block status. Therefore, for the most part this patch is just the
addition of scaling at the callers followed by inverse scaling at
bdrv_is_allocated(). But some code, particularly stream_run(),
gets a lot simpler because it no longer has to mess with sectors.
Leave comments where we can further simplify by switching to
byte-based iterations, once later patches eliminate the need for
sector-aligned operations.
For ease of review, bdrv_is_allocated() was tackled separately.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'block/commit.c')
-rw-r--r-- | block/commit.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/block/commit.c b/block/commit.c index 241aa95b3f..774a8a599c 100644 --- a/block/commit.c +++ b/block/commit.c @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn commit_run(void *opaque) int64_t offset; uint64_t delay_ns = 0; int ret = 0; - int n = 0; /* sectors */ + int64_t n = 0; /* bytes */ void *buf = NULL; int bytes_written = 0; int64_t base_len; @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn commit_run(void *opaque) buf = blk_blockalign(s->top, COMMIT_BUFFER_SIZE); - for (offset = 0; offset < s->common.len; offset += n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) { + for (offset = 0; offset < s->common.len; offset += n) { bool copy; /* Note that even when no rate limit is applied we need to yield @@ -183,15 +183,12 @@ static void coroutine_fn commit_run(void *opaque) } /* Copy if allocated above the base */ ret = bdrv_is_allocated_above(blk_bs(s->top), blk_bs(s->base), - offset / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, - COMMIT_BUFFER_SIZE / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, - &n); + offset, COMMIT_BUFFER_SIZE, &n); copy = (ret == 1); - trace_commit_one_iteration(s, offset, n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, ret); + trace_commit_one_iteration(s, offset, n, ret); if (copy) { - ret = commit_populate(s->top, s->base, offset, - n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, buf); - bytes_written += n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE; + ret = commit_populate(s->top, s->base, offset, n, buf); + bytes_written += n; } if (ret < 0) { BlockErrorAction action = @@ -204,11 +201,10 @@ static void coroutine_fn commit_run(void *opaque) } } /* Publish progress */ - s->common.offset += n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE; + s->common.offset += n; if (copy && s->common.speed) { - delay_ns = ratelimit_calculate_delay(&s->limit, - n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE); + delay_ns = ratelimit_calculate_delay(&s->limit, n); } } |