KVM: MMU: fix ept=0/pte.u=1/pte.w=0/CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0 combo

Yes, all of these are needed. :) This is admittedly a bit odd, but
kvm-unit-tests access.flat tests this if you run it with "-cpu host"
and of course ept=0.

KVM runs the guest with CR0.WP=1, so it must handle supervisor writes
specially when pte.u=1/pte.w=0/CR0.WP=0.  Such writes cause a fault
when U=1 and W=0 in the SPTE, but they must succeed because CR0.WP=0.
When KVM gets the fault, it sets U=0 and W=1 in the shadow PTE and
restarts execution.  This will still cause a user write to fault, while
supervisor writes will succeed.  User reads will fault spuriously now,
and KVM will then flip U and W again in the SPTE (U=1, W=0).  User reads
will be enabled and supervisor writes disabled, going back to the
originary situation where supervisor writes fault spuriously.

When SMEP is in effect, however, U=0 will enable kernel execution of
this page.  To avoid this, KVM also sets NX=1 in the shadow PTE together
with U=0.  If the guest has not enabled NX, the result is a continuous
stream of page faults due to the NX bit being reserved.

The fix is to force EFER.NX=1 even if the CPU is taking care of the EFER
switch.  (All machines with SMEP have the CPU_LOAD_IA32_EFER vm-entry
control, so they do not use user-return notifiers for EFER---if they did,
EFER.NX would be forced to the same value as the host).

There is another bug in the reserved bit check, which I've split to a
separate patch for easier application to stable kernels.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: f6577a5fa15d82217ca73c74cd2dcbc0f6c781dd
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 6e51493ff4f9..9bd8f44baded 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -1857,26 +1857,31 @@ static void reload_tss(void)
 
 static bool update_transition_efer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, int efer_offset)
 {
-	u64 guest_efer;
-	u64 ignore_bits;
+	u64 guest_efer = vmx->vcpu.arch.efer;
+	u64 ignore_bits = 0;
 
-	guest_efer = vmx->vcpu.arch.efer;
+	if (!enable_ept) {
+		/*
+		 * NX is needed to handle CR0.WP=1, CR4.SMEP=1.  Testing
+		 * host CPUID is more efficient than testing guest CPUID
+		 * or CR4.  Host SMEP is anyway a requirement for guest SMEP.
+		 */
+		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SMEP))
+			guest_efer |= EFER_NX;
+		else if (!(guest_efer & EFER_NX))
+			ignore_bits |= EFER_NX;
+	}
 
 	/*
-	 * NX is emulated; LMA and LME handled by hardware; SCE meaningless
-	 * outside long mode
+	 * LMA and LME handled by hardware; SCE meaningless outside long mode.
 	 */
-	ignore_bits = EFER_NX | EFER_SCE;
+	ignore_bits |= EFER_SCE;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	ignore_bits |= EFER_LMA | EFER_LME;
 	/* SCE is meaningful only in long mode on Intel */
 	if (guest_efer & EFER_LMA)
 		ignore_bits &= ~(u64)EFER_SCE;
 #endif
-	guest_efer &= ~ignore_bits;
-	guest_efer |= host_efer & ignore_bits;
-	vmx->guest_msrs[efer_offset].data = guest_efer;
-	vmx->guest_msrs[efer_offset].mask = ~ignore_bits;
 
 	clear_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_EFER);
 
@@ -1887,16 +1892,21 @@ static bool update_transition_efer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, int efer_offset)
 	 */
 	if (cpu_has_load_ia32_efer ||
 	    (enable_ept && ((vmx->vcpu.arch.efer ^ host_efer) & EFER_NX))) {
-		guest_efer = vmx->vcpu.arch.efer;
 		if (!(guest_efer & EFER_LMA))
 			guest_efer &= ~EFER_LME;
 		if (guest_efer != host_efer)
 			add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_EFER,
 					      guest_efer, host_efer);
 		return false;
-	}
+	} else {
+		guest_efer &= ~ignore_bits;
+		guest_efer |= host_efer & ignore_bits;
 
-	return true;
+		vmx->guest_msrs[efer_offset].data = guest_efer;
+		vmx->guest_msrs[efer_offset].mask = ~ignore_bits;
+
+		return true;
+	}
 }
 
 static unsigned long segment_base(u16 selector)