diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'pcl/Anomalies.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | pcl/Anomalies.txt | 34 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/pcl/Anomalies.txt b/pcl/Anomalies.txt index a570f5eb8..800d7d71e 100644 --- a/pcl/Anomalies.txt +++ b/pcl/Anomalies.txt @@ -621,18 +621,23 @@ Difference in specific tests of the PCL 5c FTS behavior, and the behavior of HP devices other than the CLJ 5/5M. The behavior of the CLJ 5/5M is apparently a bug. +1372, 1382 + small tail on beziers with triangular joins. Not likely to occur. + 1402 (et. al.): The filling of GL/2 polygon regions with lines in the Artifex PCL 5c interpreter is not completely accurate. Line space and phasing are both incorrect. These bugs are present in many other GL/2 tests as well. -1440 - 1446 (et. al.): +1422, 1423, 1424, 1445, 1446, 1462, 1463, 1801, 1803, 1811, 1817, 1894, 1895, 1941, 1946, +1950, 1951, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 2210 (page 1), 2220 (page 2) - When using GL/2 line fills, the Artifex PCL 5c interpreter clips the - rendered representation of the line, rather than the path along which - the line is to be drawn. This difference is evident in the pie wedges - used in this set of tests, and many others. + Artifex GL/2 does not support line pattern fill phasing and when + using GL/2 line fills, the Artifex PCL 5c interpreter clips the + rendered representation of the line, rather than the path along + which the line is to be drawn. This difference is evident in the + pie wedges used in this set of tests, and many others. 1463, 1463: @@ -674,16 +679,6 @@ Difference in specific tests of the PCL 5c FTS not accurate. This is particularly noticeable for arbitrary transformations of text, as in the first two tests cited. -1894, 1895 (et. al.): - - For reasons that are not completely clear, the dashed lines used for - patterned line fills in this example are completely solid in the Artifex - PCL 5c interpreter. This is a bug. - - In these and many other tests, the Artifex PCL 5c interpreter appears to - use the incorrect line pattern size (dash length). The cause of this - problem has not yet been determined. - 2003: The Artifex PCL 5c interpreter apparently misplaces the label origin for @@ -694,7 +689,10 @@ Difference in specific tests of the PCL 5c FTS 2040 - 2070: The GL/2 clipping behavior of the Artifex PCL 5c interpreter is not - identical to that of the CLJ 5/5M. + identical to that of the CLJ 5/5M. In particular, the Artifex + interpreter clips in device space not source space as hp does. + The clipping of zero width lines is device dependant resulting in + several differences between HP and Artifex in these fts panels. 2080: @@ -737,6 +735,10 @@ Difference in specific tests of the PCL 5c FTS the behavior of the implementation and different devices (Color Laserjet & 6MP) produce different results for each of these test files. +2180, 2190, 2200 + These file set the top margin inside the imageable region. We + clip to the imageable region. Applications will not do this. + 2210 (fourth page): The scaling of the output differs between the Artifex PCL 5c interpreter |