diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 36 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 5 |
2 files changed, 19 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst index 55bd37a2efb0..ebd9d90882ea 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst @@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ time, although different tasklets can run simultaneously. .. warning:: The name 'tasklet' is misleading: they have nothing to do with - 'tasks', and probably more to do with some bad vodka Alexey - Kuznetsov had at the time. + 'tasks'. You can tell you are in a softirq (or tasklet) using the :c:func:`in_softirq()` macro (``include/linux/preempt.h``). @@ -290,8 +289,8 @@ userspace. Unlike :c:func:`put_user()` and :c:func:`get_user()`, they return the amount of uncopied data (ie. 0 still means success). -[Yes, this moronic interface makes me cringe. The flamewar comes up -every year or so. --RR.] +[Yes, this objectionable interface makes me cringe. The flamewar comes +up every year or so. --RR.] The functions may sleep implicitly. This should never be called outside user context (it makes no sense), with interrupts disabled, or a @@ -645,8 +644,9 @@ names in development kernels; this is not done just to keep everyone on their toes: it reflects a fundamental change (eg. can no longer be called with interrupts on, or does extra checks, or doesn't do checks which were caught before). Usually this is accompanied by a fairly -complete note to the linux-kernel mailing list; search the archive. -Simply doing a global replace on the file usually makes things **worse**. +complete note to the appropriate kernel development mailing list; search +the archives. Simply doing a global replace on the file usually makes +things **worse**. Initializing structure members ------------------------------ @@ -723,14 +723,14 @@ Putting Your Stuff in the Kernel In order to get your stuff into shape for official inclusion, or even to make a neat patch, there's administrative work to be done: -- Figure out whose pond you've been pissing in. Look at the top of the - source files, inside the ``MAINTAINERS`` file, and last of all in the - ``CREDITS`` file. You should coordinate with this person to make sure - you're not duplicating effort, or trying something that's already - been rejected. +- Figure out who are the owners of the code you've been modifying. Look + at the top of the source files, inside the ``MAINTAINERS`` file, and + last of all in the ``CREDITS`` file. You should coordinate with these + people to make sure you're not duplicating effort, or trying something + that's already been rejected. - Make sure you put your name and EMail address at the top of any files - you create or mangle significantly. This is the first place people + Make sure you put your name and email address at the top of any files + you create or modify significantly. This is the first place people will look when they find a bug, or when **they** want to make a change. - Usually you want a configuration option for your kernel hack. Edit @@ -748,11 +748,11 @@ make a neat patch, there's administrative work to be done: can usually just add a "obj-$(CONFIG_xxx) += xxx.o" line. The syntax is documented in ``Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst``. -- Put yourself in ``CREDITS`` if you've done something noteworthy, - usually beyond a single file (your name should be at the top of the - source files anyway). ``MAINTAINERS`` means you want to be consulted - when changes are made to a subsystem, and hear about bugs; it implies - a more-than-passing commitment to some part of the code. +- Put yourself in ``CREDITS`` if you consider what you've done + noteworthy, usually beyond a single file (your name should be at the + top of the source files anyway). ``MAINTAINERS`` means you want to be + consulted when changes are made to a subsystem, and hear about bugs; + it implies a more-than-passing commitment to some part of the code. - Finally, don't forget to read ``Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst`` and possibly diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst index 4cbd50edf277..6805ae6e86e6 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst @@ -941,8 +941,7 @@ lock. A classic problem here is when you provide callbacks or hooks: if you call these with the lock held, you risk simple deadlock, or a deadly -embrace (who knows what the callback will do?). Remember, the other -programmers are out to get you, so don't do this. +embrace (who knows what the callback will do?). Overzealous Prevention Of Deadlocks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -952,8 +951,6 @@ grabs a read lock, searches a list, fails to find what it wants, drops the read lock, grabs a write lock and inserts the object has a race condition. -If you don't see why, please stay away from my code. - Racing Timers: A Kernel Pastime ------------------------------- |