diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | 2010-03-24 18:34:10 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2010-04-02 20:12:03 +0200 |
commit | 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd (patch) | |
tree | 8ed1540aaeb63da726f93da12950a8eaa0e0a3e0 /kernel/sched.c | |
parent | 9084bb8246ea935b98320554229e2f371f7f52fa (diff) |
sched: Fix TASK_WAKING vs fork deadlock
Oleg noticed a few races with the TASK_WAKING usage on fork.
- since TASK_WAKING is basically a spinlock, it should be IRQ safe
- since we set TASK_WAKING (*) without holding rq->lock it could
be there still is a rq->lock holder, thereby not actually
providing full serialization.
(*) in fact we clear PF_STARTING, which in effect enables TASK_WAKING.
Cure the second issue by not setting TASK_WAKING in sched_fork(), but
only temporarily in wake_up_new_task() while calling select_task_rq().
Cure the first by holding rq->lock around the select_task_rq() call,
this will disable IRQs, this however requires that we push down the
rq->lock release into select_task_rq_fair()'s cgroup stuff.
Because select_task_rq_fair() still needs to drop the rq->lock we
cannot fully get rid of TASK_WAKING.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched.c | 65 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 9a38c7a24ed7..dcd17736dae1 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -916,14 +916,10 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) /* * Check whether the task is waking, we use this to synchronize against * ttwu() so that task_cpu() reports a stable number. - * - * We need to make an exception for PF_STARTING tasks because the fork - * path might require task_rq_lock() to work, eg. it can call - * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() from the cpuset clone_ns code. */ static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) { - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); + return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); } /* @@ -2320,9 +2316,9 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) * The caller (fork, wakeup) owns TASK_WAKING, ->cpus_allowed is stable. */ static inline -int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags) +int select_task_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags) { - int cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, sd_flags, wake_flags); + int cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(rq, p, sd_flags, wake_flags); /* * In order not to call set_task_cpu() on a blocking task we need @@ -2393,17 +2389,10 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, if (p->sched_class->task_waking) p->sched_class->task_waking(rq, p); - __task_rq_unlock(rq); - - cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags); - if (cpu != orig_cpu) { - /* - * Since we migrate the task without holding any rq->lock, - * we need to be careful with task_rq_lock(), since that - * might end up locking an invalid rq. - */ + cpu = select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags); + if (cpu != orig_cpu) set_task_cpu(p, cpu); - } + __task_rq_unlock(rq); rq = cpu_rq(cpu); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); @@ -2530,11 +2519,11 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags) __sched_fork(p); /* - * We mark the process as waking here. This guarantees that + * We mark the process as running here. This guarantees that * nobody will actually run it, and a signal or other external * event cannot wake it up and insert it on the runqueue either. */ - p->state = TASK_WAKING; + p->state = TASK_RUNNING; /* * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested. @@ -2601,28 +2590,25 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags) int cpu __maybe_unused = get_cpu(); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP + rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); + p->state = TASK_WAKING; + /* * Fork balancing, do it here and not earlier because: * - cpus_allowed can change in the fork path * - any previously selected cpu might disappear through hotplug * - * We still have TASK_WAKING but PF_STARTING is gone now, meaning - * ->cpus_allowed is stable, we have preemption disabled, meaning - * cpu_online_mask is stable. + * We set TASK_WAKING so that select_task_rq() can drop rq->lock + * without people poking at ->cpus_allowed. */ - cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0); + cpu = select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0); set_task_cpu(p, cpu); -#endif - - /* - * Since the task is not on the rq and we still have TASK_WAKING set - * nobody else will migrate this task. - */ - rq = cpu_rq(cpu); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); - BUG_ON(p->state != TASK_WAKING); p->state = TASK_RUNNING; + task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); +#endif + + rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); activate_task(rq, p, 0); trace_sched_wakeup_new(rq, p, 1); check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK); @@ -3068,19 +3054,15 @@ void sched_exec(void) { struct task_struct *p = current; struct migration_req req; - int dest_cpu, this_cpu; unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; - - this_cpu = get_cpu(); - dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0); - if (dest_cpu == this_cpu) { - put_cpu(); - return; - } + int dest_cpu; rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); - put_cpu(); + dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0); + if (dest_cpu == smp_processor_id()) + goto unlock; + /* * select_task_rq() can race against ->cpus_allowed */ @@ -3098,6 +3080,7 @@ void sched_exec(void) return; } +unlock: task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); } |