From 4764e6222bf4d5223fc2fbb139bb31a24819b2b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Behdad Esfahbod Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 00:50:03 -0400 Subject: [cairo-mutex] Improve error message if no thread implementation found to put back Carl's "acknowledge and accept" clause (!) before suggesting use of CAIRO_NO_MUTEX. --- src/cairo-mutex-type-private.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/cairo-mutex-type-private.h') diff --git a/src/cairo-mutex-type-private.h b/src/cairo-mutex-type-private.h index d3c27c15..8ec85cf9 100644 --- a/src/cairo-mutex-type-private.h +++ b/src/cairo-mutex-type-private.h @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ CAIRO_BEGIN_DECLS #else /**********************************************************************/ -# error "XXX: No mutex implementation found. Define CAIRO_NO_MUTEX to 1" \ - " to compile cairo without thread-safety support." +# error "XXX: No mutex implementation found. Cairo will not work with multiple threads. Define CAIRO_NO_MUTEX to 1 to acknowledge and accept this limitation and compile cairo without thread-safety support." + #endif -- cgit v1.2.3