diff options
author | Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net> | 2009-10-05 15:31:54 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net> | 2009-10-06 18:58:47 +1000 |
commit | 5bc90ffdee0e95727767ce3df9154ea3ff3d6f95 (patch) | |
tree | 322f68b077fd0ee2997156710fdd0af4edb00e86 | |
parent | 5c35d07c3b0fc8cc60fc622d6eb444bea2be0acc (diff) |
xfree86: remove log-spamming DebugF
All input drivers use xf86PostKeyEventP indirectly now and have been since
it exists. I guess that qualifies it as tested - no need to spam the logs.
Reported-by: Felix Wenk
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
(cherry picked from commit bd7430a32e63df8cd60352764744076448ee623f)
-rw-r--r-- | hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c index b36953700..fd07c2a06 100644 --- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c +++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Xinput.c @@ -896,11 +896,6 @@ xf86PostKeyEvent(DeviceIntPtr device, int i = 0; static int valuators[MAX_VALUATORS]; - /* instil confidence in the user */ - DebugF("this function has never been tested properly. if things go quite " - "badly south after this message, then xf86PostKeyEvent is " - "broken.\n"); - XI_VERIFY_VALUATORS(num_valuators); va_start(var, num_valuators); @@ -924,11 +919,6 @@ xf86PostKeyEventP(DeviceIntPtr device, { int i = 0, nevents = 0; - /* instil confidence in the user */ - DebugF("this function has never been tested properly. if things go quite " - "badly south after this message, then xf86PostKeyEvent is " - "broken.\n"); - XI_VERIFY_VALUATORS(num_valuators); if (is_absolute) { |