diff options
author | Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> | 2014-04-15 19:18:40 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> | 2014-04-17 21:34:03 +0100 |
commit | 2c7ffc414d8591018248b5487757e45f7bb6bd3c (patch) | |
tree | 4d4d2e4ec155fb23905b7160f023113645232aca /COPYING | |
parent | 90e496386fe7fd32c189561f846b7913f95b8cf4 (diff) |
target-arm: Fix VFP enables for AArch32 EL0 under AArch64 EL1
The current A32/T32 decoder bases its "is VFP/Neon enabled?" check
on the FPSCR.EN bit. This is correct if EL1 is AArch32, but for
an AArch64 EL1 the logic is different: it must act as if FPSCR.EN
is always set. Instead, trapping must happen according to CPACR
bits for cp10/cp11; these cover all of FP/Neon, including the
FPSCR/FPSID/MVFR register accesses which FPSCR.EN does not affect.
Add support for CPACR checks (which are also required for ARMv7,
but were unimplemented because Linux happens not to use them)
and make sure they generate exceptions with the correct syndrome.
We actually return incorrect syndrome information for cases
where FP is disabled but the specific instruction bit pattern
is unallocated: strictly these should be the Uncategorized
exception, not a "SIMD disabled" exception. This should be
mostly harmless, and the structure of the A32/T32 VFP/Neon
decoder makes it painful to put the 'FP disabled?' checks in
the right places.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions