summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/notify/mark.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-03-16fanotify: configurable limits via sysfsAmir Goldstein1-4/+0
fanotify has some hardcoded limits. The only APIs to escape those limits are FAN_UNLIMITED_QUEUE and FAN_UNLIMITED_MARKS. Allow finer grained tuning of the system limits via sysfs tunables under /proc/sys/fs/fanotify, similar to tunables under /proc/sys/fs/inotify, with some minor differences. - max_queued_events - global system tunable for group queue size limit. Like the inotify tunable with the same name, it defaults to 16384 and applies on initialization of a new group. - max_user_marks - user ns tunable for marks limit per user. Like the inotify tunable named max_user_watches, on a machine with sufficient RAM and it defaults to 1048576 in init userns and can be further limited per containing user ns. - max_user_groups - user ns tunable for number of groups per user. Like the inotify tunable named max_user_instances, it defaults to 128 in init userns and can be further limited per containing user ns. The slightly different tunable names used for fanotify are derived from the "group" and "mark" terminology used in the fanotify man pages and throughout the code. Considering the fact that the default value for max_user_instances was increased in kernel v5.10 from 8192 to 1048576, leaving the legacy fanotify limit of 8192 marks per group in addition to the max_user_marks limit makes little sense, so the per group marks limit has been removed. Note that when a group is initialized with FAN_UNLIMITED_MARKS, its own marks are not accounted in the per user marks account, so in effect the limit of max_user_marks is only for the collection of groups that are not initialized with FAN_UNLIMITED_MARKS. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304112921.3996419-2-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2020-04-15fsnotify: Add missing annotation for fsnotify_finish_user_wait() and for ↵Jules Irenge1-1/+5
fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() Sparse reports warnings at fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() and at fsnotify_finish_user_wait() warning: context imbalance in fsnotify_finish_user_wait() - wrong count at exit warning: context imbalance in fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() - unexpected unlock The root cause is the missing annotation at fsnotify_finish_user_wait() and at fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() has an extra annotation __release() that only tell Sparse and not GCC to shutdown the warning Add the missing __acquires(&fsnotify_mark_srcu) annotation Add the missing __releases(&fsnotify_mark_srcu) annotation Add the __release(&fsnotify_mark_srcu) annotation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200413214240.15245-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-08-19notify: export symbols for use by the knfsd file cacheTrond Myklebust1-0/+6
The knfsd file cache will need to detect when files are unlinked, so that it can close the associated cached files. Export a minimal set of notifier functions to allow it to do so. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2019-06-19fanotify: update connector fsid cache on add markAmir Goldstein1-3/+11
When implementing connector fsid cache, we only initialized the cache when the first mark added to object was added by FAN_REPORT_FID group. We forgot to update conn->fsid when the second mark is added by FAN_REPORT_FID group to an already attached connector without fsid cache. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c277e8e2f46414645508@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 77115225acc6 ("fanotify: cache fsid in fsnotify_mark_connector") Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-05-21treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 18Thomas Gleixner1-14/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program see the file copying if not write to the free software foundation 675 mass ave cambridge ma 02139 usa extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 52 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@jilayne.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190519154042.342335923@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-01fsnotify: Clarify connector assignment in fsnotify_add_mark_list()Jan Kara1-0/+5
Add a comment explaining why WRITE_ONCE() is enough when setting mark->connector which can get dereferenced by RCU protected readers. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-04-28fsnotify: Fix NULL ptr deref in fanotify_get_fsid()Jan Kara1-6/+6
fanotify_get_fsid() is reading mark->connector->fsid under srcu. It can happen that it sees mark not fully initialized or mark that is already detached from the object list. In these cases mark->connector can be NULL leading to NULL ptr dereference. Fix the problem by being careful when reading mark->connector and check it for being NULL. Also use WRITE_ONCE when writing the mark just to prevent compiler from doing something stupid. Reported-by: syzbot+15927486a4f1bfcbaf91@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 77115225acc6 ("fanotify: cache fsid in fsnotify_mark_connector") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-02-07fanotify: cache fsid in fsnotify_mark_connectorAmir Goldstein1-7/+35
For FAN_REPORT_FID, we need to encode fid with fsid of the filesystem on every event. To avoid having to call vfs_statfs() on every event to get fsid, we store the fsid in fsnotify_mark_connector on the first time we add a mark and on handle event we use the cached fsid. Subsequent calls to add mark on the same object are expected to pass the same fsid, so the call will fail on cached fsid mismatch. If an event is reported on several mark types (inode, mount, filesystem), all connectors should already have the same fsid, so we use the cached fsid from the first connector. [JK: Simplify code flow around fanotify_get_fid() make fsid argument of fsnotify_add_mark_locked() unconditional] Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-10-25fsnotify: Fix busy inodes during unmountJan Kara1-8/+31
Detaching of mark connector from fsnotify_put_mark() can race with unmounting of the filesystem like: CPU1 CPU2 fsnotify_put_mark() spin_lock(&conn->lock); ... inode = fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object(conn) spin_unlock(&conn->lock); generic_shutdown_super() fsnotify_unmount_inodes() sees connector detached for inode -> nothing to do evict_inode() barfs on pending inode reference iput(inode); Resulting in "Busy inodes after unmount" message and possible kernel oops. Make fsnotify_unmount_inodes() properly wait for outstanding inode references from detached connectors. Note that the accounting of outstanding inode references in the superblock can cause some cacheline contention on the counter. OTOH it happens only during deletion of the last notification mark from an inode (or during unlinking of watched inode) and that is not too bad. I have measured time to create & delete inotify watch 100000 times from 64 processes in parallel (each process having its own inotify group and its own file on a shared superblock) on a 64 CPU machine. Average and standard deviation of 15 runs look like: Avg Stddev Vanilla 9.817400 0.276165 Fixed 9.710467 0.228294 So there's no statistically significant difference. Fixes: 6b3f05d24d35 ("fsnotify: Detach mark from object list when last reference is dropped") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-09-03fsnotify: add super block object typeAmir Goldstein1-0/+4
Add the infrastructure to attach a mark to a super_block struct and detach all attached marks when super block is destroyed. This is going to be used by fanotify backend to setup super block marks. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-08-20fsnotify: fix false positive warning on inode deleteJan Kara1-3/+3
When inode is getting deleted and someone else holds reference to a mark attached to the inode, we just detach the connector from the inode. In that case fsnotify_put_mark() called from fsnotify_destroy_marks() will decide to recalculate mask for the inode and __fsnotify_recalc_mask() will WARN about invalid connector type: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 12015 at fs/notify/mark.c:139 __fsnotify_recalc_mask+0x2d7/0x350 fs/notify/mark.c:139 Actually there's no reason to warn about detached connector in __fsnotify_recalc_mask() so just silently skip updating the mask in such case. Reported-by: syzbot+c34692a51b9a6ca93540@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 3ac70bfcde81 ("fsnotify: add helper to get mask from connector") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27fsnotify: add helper to get mask from connectorAmir Goldstein1-4/+21
Use a helper to get the mask from the object (i.e. i_fsnotify_mask) to generalize code of add/remove inode/vfsmount mark. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27fsnotify: let connector point to an abstract objectAmir Goldstein1-16/+16
Make the code to attach/detach a connector to object more generic by letting the fsnotify connector point to an abstract fsnotify_connp_t. Code that needs to dereference an inode or mount object now uses the helpers fsnotify_conn_{inode,mount}. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27fsnotify: pass connp and object type to fsnotify_add_mark()Amir Goldstein1-25/+17
Instead of passing inode and vfsmount arguments to fsnotify_add_mark() and its _locked variant, pass an abstract object pointer and the object type. The helpers fsnotify_obj_{inode,mount} are added to get the concrete object pointer from abstract object pointer. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27fsnotify: use typedef fsnotify_connp_t for brevityAmir Goldstein1-11/+9
The object marks manipulation functions fsnotify_destroy_marks() fsnotify_find_mark() and their helpers take an argument of type struct fsnotify_mark_connector __rcu ** to dereference the connector pointer. use a typedef to describe this type for brevity. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-05-18fsnotify: generalize iteration of marks by object typeAmir Goldstein1-8/+15
Make some code that handles marks of object types inode and vfsmount generic, so it can handle other object types. Introduce fsnotify_foreach_obj_type macro to iterate marks by object type and fsnotify_iter_{should|set}_report_type macros to set/test report_mask. This is going to be used for adding mark of another object type (super block mark). Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-05-18fsnotify: use type id to identify connector object typeAmir Goldstein1-15/+14
An fsnotify_mark_connector is referencing a single type of object (either inode or vfsmount). Instead of storing a type mask in connector->flags, store a single type id in connector->type to identify the type of object. When a connector object is detached from the object, its type is set to FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_DETACHED and this object is not going to be reused. The function fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group() is the only place where type mask was used, so use type flags instead of type id to this function. This change is going to be more convenient when adding a new object type (super block). Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31fsnotify: convert fsnotify_mark.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_tElena Reshetova1-7/+7
atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference counters with the following properties: - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set() - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero - once counter reaches zero, its further increments aren't allowed - counter schema uses basic atomic operations (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.) Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable. The variable fsnotify_mark.refcnt is used as pure reference counter. Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations. Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31fsnotify: fix pinning group in fsnotify_prepare_user_wait()Miklos Szeredi1-14/+11
Blind increment of group's user_waits is not enough, we could be far enough in the group's destruction that it isn't taken into account (i.e. grabbing the mark ref afterwards doesn't guarantee that it was the ref coming from the _group_ that was grabbed). Instead we need to check (under lock) that the mark is still attached to the group after having obtained a ref to the mark. If not, skip it. Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Fixes: 9385a84d7e1f ("fsnotify: Pass fsnotify_iter_info into handle_event handler") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31fsnotify: clean up fsnotify_prepare/finish_user_wait()Miklos Szeredi1-48/+48
This patch doesn't actually fix any bug, just paves the way for fixing mark and group pinning. Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31fsnotify: Protect bail out path of fsnotify_add_mark_locked() properlyJan Kara1-0/+2
When fsnotify_add_mark_locked() fails it cleans up the mark it was adding. Since the mark is already visible in group's list, we should protect update of mark->flags with mark->lock. I'm not aware of any real issues this could cause (since we also hold group->mark_mutex) but better be safe and obey locking rules properly. Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-24fsnotify: remove a stray unlockDan Carpenter1-1/+0
We recently shifted this code around, so we're no longer holding the lock on this path. Fixes: 755b5bc681eb ("fsnotify: Remove indirection from mark list addition") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move ->free_mark callback to fsnotify_opsJan Kara1-6/+7
Pointer to ->free_mark callback unnecessarily occupies one long in each fsnotify_mark although they are the same for all marks from one notification group. Move the callback pointer to fsnotify_ops. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Add group pointer in fsnotify_init_mark()Jan Kara1-7/+10
Currently we initialize mark->group only in fsnotify_add_mark_lock(). However we will need to access fsnotify_ops of corresponding group from fsnotify_put_mark() so we need mark->group initialized earlier. Do that in fsnotify_init_mark() which has a consequence that once fsnotify_init_mark() is called on a mark, the mark has to be destroyed by fsnotify_put_mark(). Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_detach_group_marks()Jan Kara1-35/+10
The function is already mostly contained in what fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group() does. Just update that function to not select marks when all of them should be destroyed and remove fsnotify_detach_group_marks(). Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Rename fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()Jan Kara1-7/+5
The _flags() suffix in the function name was more confusing than explaining so just remove it. Also rename the argument from 'flags' to 'type' to better explain what the function expects. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_set_mark_{,ignored_}mask_locked()Jan Kara1-14/+0
These helpers are now only a simple assignment and just obfuscate what is going on. Remove them. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Provide framework for dropping SRCU lock in ->handle_eventJan Kara1-0/+82
fanotify wants to drop fsnotify_mark_srcu lock when waiting for response from userspace so that the whole notification subsystem is not blocked during that time. This patch provides a framework for safely getting mark reference for a mark found in the object list which pins the mark in that list. We can then drop fsnotify_mark_srcu, wait for userspace response and then safely continue iteration of the object list once we reaquire fsnotify_mark_srcu. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Remove special handling of mark destruction on group shutdownJan Kara1-3/+4
Currently we queue all marks for destruction on group shutdown and then destroy them from fsnotify_destroy_group() instead from a worker thread which is the usual path. However worker can already be processing some list of marks to destroy so this does not make 100% all marks are really destroyed by the time group is shut down. This isn't a big problem as each mark holds group reference and thus group stays partially alive until all marks are really freed but there's no point in complicating our lives - just wait for the delayed work to be finished instead. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Detach mark from object list when last reference is droppedJan Kara1-59/+88
Instead of removing mark from object list from fsnotify_detach_mark(), remove the mark when last reference to the mark is dropped. This will allow fanotify to wait for userspace response to event without having to hold onto fsnotify_mark_srcu. To avoid pinning inodes by elevated refcount (and thus e.g. delaying file deletion) while someone holds mark reference, we detach connector from the object also from fsnotify_destroy_marks() and not only after removing last mark from the list as it was now. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move queueing of mark for destruction into fsnotify_put_mark()Jan Kara1-44/+29
Currently we queue mark into a list of marks for destruction in __fsnotify_free_mark() and keep the last mark reference dangling. After the worker waits for SRCU period, it drops the last reference to the mark which frees it. This scheme has the disadvantage that if we hold reference to a mark and drop and reacquire SRCU lock, the mark can get freed immediately which is slightly inconvenient and we will need to avoid this in the future. Move to a scheme where queueing of mark into a list of marks for destruction happens when the last reference to the mark is dropped. Also drop reference to the mark held by group list already when mark is removed from that list instead of dropping it only from the destruction worker. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Free fsnotify_mark_connector when there is no mark attachedJan Kara1-40/+112
Currently we free fsnotify_mark_connector structure only when inode / vfsmount is getting freed. This can however impose noticeable memory overhead when marks get attached to inodes only temporarily. So free the connector structure once the last mark is detached from the object. Since notification infrastructure can be working with the connector under the protection of fsnotify_mark_srcu, we have to be careful and free the fsnotify_mark_connector only after SRCU period passes. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Lock object list with connector lockJan Kara1-58/+32
So far list of marks attached to an object (inode / vfsmount) was protected by i_lock or mnt_root->d_lock. This dictates that the list must be empty before the object can be destroyed although the list is now anchored in the fsnotify_mark_connector structure. Protect the list by a spinlock in the fsnotify_mark_connector structure to decouple lifetime of a list of marks from a lifetime of the object. This also simplifies the code quite a bit since we don't have to differentiate between inode and vfsmount lists in quite a few places anymore. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Remove useless list deletion and commentJan Kara1-6/+0
After removing all the indirection it is clear that hlist_del_init_rcu(&mark->obj_list); in fsnotify_destroy_marks() is not needed as the mark gets removed from the list shortly afterwards in fsnotify_destroy_mark() -> fsnotify_detach_mark() -> fsnotify_detach_from_object(). Also there is no problem with mark being visible on object list while we call fsnotify_destroy_mark() as parallel destruction of marks from several places is properly handled (as mentioned in the comment in fsnotify_destroy_marks(). So just remove the list removal and also the stale comment. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Avoid double locking in fsnotify_detach_from_object()Jan Kara1-1/+1
We lock object list lock in fsnotify_detach_from_object() twice - once to detach mark and second time to recalculate mask. That is unnecessary and later it will become problematic as we will free the connector as soon as there is no mark in it. So move recalculation of fsnotify mask into the same critical section that is detaching mark. This also removes recalculation of child dentry flags from fsnotify_detach_from_object(). That is however fine. Those marks will get recalculated once some event happens on a child. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Remove indirection from fsnotify_detach_mark()Jan Kara1-6/+26
fsnotify_detach_mark() calls fsnotify_destroy_inode_mark() or fsnotify_destroy_vfsmount_mark() to remove mark from object list. These two functions are however very similar and differ only in the lock they use to protect the object list of marks. Simplify the code by removing the indirection and removing mark from the object list in a common function. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Determine lock in fsnotify_destroy_marks()Jan Kara1-2/+7
Instead of passing spinlock into fsnotify_destroy_marks() determine it directly in that function from the connector type. This will reduce code churn when changing lock protecting list of marks. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move locking into fsnotify_find_mark()Jan Kara1-0/+8
Move locking of a mark list into fsnotify_find_mark(). This reduces code churn in the following patch changing lock protecting the list. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move locking into fsnotify_recalc_mask()Jan Kara1-10/+30
Move locking of locks protecting a list of marks into fsnotify_recalc_mask(). This reduces code churn in the following patch which changes the lock protecting the list of marks. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move fsnotify_destroy_marks()Jan Kara1-36/+36
Move fsnotify_destroy_marks() to be later in the fs/notify/mark.c. It will need some functions that are declared after its current declaration. No functional change. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Remove indirection from mark list additionJan Kara1-23/+43
Adding notification mark to object list has been currently done through fsnotify_add_{inode|vfsmount}_mark() helpers from fsnotify_add_mark_locked() which call fsnotify_add_mark_list(). Remove this unnecessary indirection to simplify the code. Pushing all the locking to fsnotify_add_mark_list() also allows us to allocate the connector structure with GFP_KERNEL mode. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Make fsnotify_mark_connector hold inode referenceJan Kara1-11/+6
Currently inode reference is held by fsnotify marks. Change the rules so that inode reference is held by fsnotify_mark_connector structure whenever the list is non-empty. This simplifies the code and is more logical. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move object pointer to fsnotify_mark_connectorJan Kara1-10/+22
Move pointer to inode / vfsmount from mark itself to the fsnotify_mark_connector structure. This is another step on the path towards decoupling inode / vfsmount lifetime from notification mark lifetime. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Move mark list head from object into dedicated structureJan Kara1-13/+67
Currently notification marks are attached to object (inode or vfsmnt) by a hlist_head in the object. The list is also protected by a spinlock in the object. So while there is any mark attached to the list of marks, the object must be pinned in memory (and thus e.g. last iput() deleting inode cannot happen). Also for list iteration in fsnotify() to work, we must hold fsnotify_mark_srcu lock so that mark itself and mark->obj_list.next cannot get freed. Thus we are required to wait for response to fanotify events from userspace process with fsnotify_mark_srcu lock held. That causes issues when userspace process is buggy and does not reply to some event - basically the whole notification subsystem gets eventually stuck. So to be able to drop fsnotify_mark_srcu lock while waiting for response, we have to pin the mark in memory and make sure it stays in the object list (as removing the mark waiting for response could lead to lost notification events for groups later in the list). However we don't want inode reclaim to block on such mark as that would lead to system just locking up elsewhere. This commit is the first in the series that paves way towards solving these conflicting lifetime needs. Instead of anchoring the list of marks directly in the object, we anchor it in a dedicated structure (fsnotify_mark_connector) and just point to that structure from the object. The following commits will also add spinlock protecting the list and object pointer to the structure. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10fsnotify: Update commentsJan Kara1-12/+1
Add a comment that lifetime of a notification mark is protected by SRCU and remove a comment about clearing of marks attached to the inode. It is stale and more uptodate version is at fsnotify_destroy_marks() which is the function handling this case. Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2016-12-23fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_duplicate_mark()Jan Kara1-12/+0
There are only two calls sites of fsnotify_duplicate_mark(). Those are in kernel/audit_tree.c and both are bogus. Vfsmount pointer is unused for audit tree, inode pointer and group gets set in fsnotify_add_mark_locked() later anyway, mask and free_mark are already set in alloc_chunk(). In fact, calling fsnotify_duplicate_mark() is actively harmful because following fsnotify_add_mark_locked() will leak group reference by overwriting the group pointer. So just remove the two calls to fsnotify_duplicate_mark() and the function. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> [PM: line wrapping to fit in 80 chars] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2016-05-19fsnotify: avoid spurious EMFILE errors from inotify_init()Jan Kara1-17/+61
Inotify instance is destroyed when all references to it are dropped. That not only means that the corresponding file descriptor needs to be closed but also that all corresponding instance marks are freed (as each mark holds a reference to the inotify instance). However marks are freed only after SRCU period ends which can take some time and thus if user rapidly creates and frees inotify instances, number of existing inotify instances can exceed max_user_instances limit although from user point of view there is always at most one existing instance. Thus inotify_init() returns EMFILE error which is hard to justify from user point of view. This problem is exposed by LTP inotify06 testcase on some machines. We fix the problem by making sure all group marks are properly freed while destroying inotify instance. We wait for SRCU period to end in that path anyway since we have to make sure there is no event being added to the instance while we are tearing down the instance. So it takes only some plumbing to allow for marks to be destroyed in that path as well and not from a dedicated work item. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-18fsnotify: turn fsnotify reaper thread into a workqueue jobJeff Layton1-31/+18
We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq. In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are a lot of marks being removed, we delay the reaper job slightly when queueing it, to allow several to gather on the list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Tested-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-18Revert "fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread"Jeff Layton1-14/+52
This reverts commit c510eff6beba ("fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread"). Eryu reported that he was seeing some OOM kills kick in when running a testcase that adds and removes inotify marks on a file in a tight loop. The above commit changed the code to use call_srcu to clean up the marks. While that does (in principle) work, the srcu callback job is limited to cleaning up entries in small batches and only once per jiffy. It's easily possible to overwhelm that machinery with too many call_srcu callbacks, and Eryu's reproduer did just that. There's also another potential problem with using call_srcu here. While you can obviously sleep while holding the srcu_read_lock, the callbacks run under local_bh_disable, so you can't sleep there. It's possible when putting the last reference to the fsnotify_mark that we'll end up putting a chain of references including the fsnotify_group, uid, and associated keys. While I don't see any obvious ways that that could occurs, it's probably still best to avoid using call_srcu here after all. This patch reverts the above patch. A later patch will take a different approach to eliminated the dedicated thread here. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reported-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Tested-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-14fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated threadJeff Layton1-52/+14
At the time that this code was originally written, call_srcu didn't exist, so this thread was required to ensure that we waited for that SRCU grace period to settle before finally freeing the object. It does exist now however and we can much more efficiently use call_srcu to handle this. That also allows us to potentially use srcu_barrier to ensure that they are all of the callbacks have run before proceeding. In order to conserve space, we union the rcu_head with the g_list. This will be necessary for nfsd which will allocate marks from a dedicated slabcache. We have to be able to ensure that all of the objects are destroyed before destroying the cache. That's fairly Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>