summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-05-02Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86-mmTejun Heo1-1/+1
Merge reason: Pick up the following two fix commits. 2be19102b7: x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() 765af22da8: x86-32, NUMA: Fix ACPI NUMA init broken by recent x86-64 change Scheduled NUMA init 32/64bit unification changes depend on these. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2011-03-31Fix common misspellingsLucas De Marchi1-1/+1
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
2011-03-29acpi throttling: Use this_cpu_has and simplify code current cpuChristoph Lameter1-22/+10
With the this_cpu_xx we no longer need to pass an acpi structure to the msr management code. Simplifies code and improves performance. NOTE: This code is x86 specific (see #ifdef CONFIG_X86) but not under arch/x86. Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2011-01-12Merge branch 'throttling' into releaseLen Brown1-3/+73
2011-01-10ACPI: Reevaluate whether the T-state is supported or not after cpu is ↵Zhao Yakui1-0/+52
online/offline After one CPU is offlined, it is unnecessary to switch T-state for it. So it will be better that the throttling is disabled after the cpu is offline. At the same time after one cpu is online, we should check whether the T-state is supported and then set the corresponding T-state flag. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-10ACPI: Check the returned value of set_cpus_allowed_ptr before T-state operationZhao Yakui1-3/+21
Now before it executes the T-state operation on one CPU, it will try to migrate to the target CPU. Especially this is required on the system that uses the MSR_IA32_THERMAL_CONTROL register to switch T-state. But unfortunately it doesn't check whether the migration is successful or not. In such case we will get/set the incorrect T-state on the offline CPU as it fails in the migration to the offline CPU. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-12-14ACPI processor: remove processor throttling control procfs I/FZhang Rui1-114/+0
Remove deprecated ACPI process procfs I/F for throttling control. This is because the t-state control should only be done in kernel, when system is in a overheating state. Now users can only change the processor t-state indirectly, by poking the cooling device sysfs I/F of the processor. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-10-15ACPI processor: make /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttle depends on ↵Zhang Rui1-0/+4
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS As a feature that would only be used when system is overheating, the processor t-state control should not be exported to user space. Make /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttle depends on CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS, which is cleared by default. And we will remove this I/F in 2.6.38. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-08-15ACPI processor: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/FZhang Rui1-2/+0
Remove deprecated ACPI processor procfs I/F, including: /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/power /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/limit /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/info /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/throttling still exists, as we don't have sysfs I/F available for now. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-03-30include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking ↵Tejun Heo1-0/+1
implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-14Merge branches 'battery-2.6.34', 'bugzilla-10805', 'bugzilla-14668', ↵Len Brown1-15/+12
'bugzilla-531916-power-state', 'ht-warn-2.6.34', 'pnp', 'processor-rename', 'sony-2.6.34', 'suse-bugzilla-531547', 'tz-check', 'video' and 'misc-2.6.34' into release
2010-02-16ACPI: remove superfluous NULL pointer check from ↵Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz1-3/+0
acpi_processor_get_throttling_info() Dan's list contains: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c +1139 acpi_processor_get_throttling_info(11) warning: variable derefenced before check 'pr' acpi_processor_get_throttling_info() is never called with pr == NULL. [ bart: the potential NULL pointer dereference was finally fixed in (much later than mine) commit 5cfa245 but my patch is still valid ] Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-01-28ACPI: replace acpi_integer by u64Lin Ming1-12/+12
acpi_integer is now obsolete and removed from the ACPICA code base, replaced by u64. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-05ACPI: Move dereference after NULL testJulia Lawall1-3/+3
If the NULL test on pr is needed, then the dereference should be after the NULL test. A simplified version of the semantic match that detects this problem is as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/): // <smpl> @match exists@ expression x, E; identifier fld; @@ * x->fld ... when != \(x = E\|&x\) * x == NULL // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-09-24cpumask: use zalloc_cpumask_var() where possibleLi Zefan1-2/+1
Remove open-coded zalloc_cpumask_var() and zalloc_cpumask_var_node(). Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-09-19Merge branch 'processor-procfs-2.6.32' into releaseLen Brown1-1/+2
2009-08-28ACPI: Move definition of PREFIX from acpi_bus.h to internal..hLen Brown1-0/+2
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ", however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own. Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there. This does not change any actual console output, asside from a whitespace fix. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-08-26acpi processor: remove superfluous warning messageFrans Pop1-2/+2
This failure is very common on many platforms. Handling it in the ACPI processor driver is enough, and we don't need a warning message unless CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is set. Based on a patch from Zhang Rui. Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-08-26ACPI processor: force throttling state when BIOS returns incorrect valueFrans Pop1-12/+14
If the BIOS reports an invalid throttling state (which seems to be fairly common after system boot), a reset is done to state T0. Because of a check in acpi_processor_get_throttling_ptc(), the reset never actually gets executed, which results in the error reoccurring on every access of for example /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling. Add a 'force' option to acpi_processor_set_throttling() to ensure the reset really takes effect. Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 This patch, together with the next one, fixes a regression introduced in 2.6.30, listed on the regression list. They have been available for 2.5 months now in bugzilla, but have not been picked up, despite various reminders and without any reason given. Google shows that numerous people are hitting this issue. The issue is in itself relatively minor, but the bug in the code is clear. The patches have been in all my kernels and today testing has shown that throttling works correctly with the patches applied when the system overheats (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c14). Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-24ACPI: Make ACPI processor proc I/F depend on the ACPI_PROCFSZhao Yakui1-1/+2
Now whether the ACPI processor proc I/F is registered depends on the CONFIG_PROC. It had better depend on the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS. When the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS is unset in kernel configuration, the ACPI processor proc I/F won't be registered. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-29ACPI processor: remove spurious newline from warning messageFrans Pop1-1/+1
Commit 4973b22a ("ACPI processor: reset the throttling state once it's invalid") introduced a new warning which prints a spurious newline. The ACPI_WARNING macro that is used already takes care of adding a newline, after adding ACPI_CA_VERSION to the message. Remove the newline to avoid the message getting split into two lines. Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-15ACPI processor: reset the throttling state once it's invalidZhang Rui1-0/+8
If the BIOS hands us an invalid throttling state, write a valid state. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: James Ettle <theholyettlz@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-15ACPI processor: introduce module parameter processor.ignore_tpcZhang Rui1-0/+17
Introduce module parameter processor.ignore_tpc. Some laptops are shipped with buggy _TPC, this module parameter is used to to disable the buggy support. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: James Ettle <theholyettlz@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-05Merge branch 'misc' into releaseLen Brown1-4/+2
2009-04-03ACPI: constify VFTs (1/2)Jan Engelhardt1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-03ACPI: get_throttling_state() cannot be larger than state_countLen Brown1-4/+2
Reported-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-01-03cpumask: convert shared_cpu_map in acpi_processor* structs to cpumask_var_tRusty Russell1-28/+52
Impact: Reduce memory usage, use new API. This is part of an effort to reduce structure sizes for machines configured with large NR_CPUS. cpumask_t gets replaced by cpumask_var_t, which is either struct cpumask[1] (small NR_CPUS) or struct cpumask * (large NR_CPUS). (Changes to powernow-k* by <travis>.) Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-07ACPI: consolidate ACPI_*_COMPONENT definitions in acpi_drivers.hBjorn Helgaas1-1/+1
Move all the component definitions for drivers to a single shared place, include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'ull' into testLen Brown1-1/+1
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/bay.c drivers/acpi/dock.c drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22ACPI: replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printkLin Ming1-5/+5
ACPI_DB_ERROR and ACPI_DB_WARN were removed from ACPICA core. So replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX ...) and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN, ...) with printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX ...) We do not use ACPI_ERROR/ACPI_WARNING since they're not exported, see ------------------------------------------------------------- commit 6468463abd7051fcc29f3ee7c931f9bbbb26f5a4 Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Date: Mon Jun 26 23:41:38 2006 -0400 ACPI: un-export ACPI_ERROR() -- use printk(KERN_ERR...) Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> ------------------------------------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-11ACPI: Change acpi_evaluate_integer to support 64-bit on 32-bit kernelsMatthew Wilcox1-1/+1
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms. Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support 64-bit integers on all platforms. lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long" lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-26cpumask: change cpumask_of_cpu_ptr to use new cpumask_of_cpuMike Travis1-8/+3
* Replace previous instances of the cpumask_of_cpu_ptr* macros with a the new (lvalue capable) generic cpumask_of_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18cpumask: Replace cpumask_of_cpu with cpumask_of_cpu_ptrMike Travis1-3/+8
* This patch replaces the dangerous lvalue version of cpumask_of_cpu with new cpumask_of_cpu_ptr macros. These are patterned after the node_to_cpumask_ptr macros. In general terms, if there is a cpumask_of_cpu_map[] then a pointer to the cpumask_of_cpu_map[cpu] entry is used. The cpumask_of_cpu_map is provided when there is a large NR_CPUS count, reducing greatly the amount of code generated and stack space used for cpumask_of_cpu(). The pointer to the cpumask_t value is needed for calling set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to reduce the amount of stack space needed to pass the cpumask_t value. If there isn't a cpumask_of_cpu_map[], then a temporary variable is declared and filled in with value from cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) as well as a pointer variable pointing to this temporary variable. Afterwards, the pointer is used to reference the cpumask value. The compiler will optimize out the extra dereference through the pointer as well as the stack space used for the pointer, resulting in identical code. A good example of the orthogonal usages is in net/sunrpc/svc.c: case SVC_POOL_PERCPU: { unsigned int cpu = m->pool_to[pidx]; cpumask_of_cpu_ptr(cpumask, cpu); *oldmask = current->cpus_allowed; set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask); return 1; } case SVC_POOL_PERNODE: { unsigned int node = m->pool_to[pidx]; node_to_cpumask_ptr(nodecpumask, node); *oldmask = current->cpus_allowed; set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, nodecpumask); return 1; } Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar1-11/+27
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-16acpi: fix printk format warningRandy Dunlap1-1/+1
Fix printk format warning: linux-next-20080617/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:1258: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: fix processor throttling set errorYi Yang1-4/+20
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 When echo some invalid values to /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling, there isn't any error info returned, on the contray, it sets throttling value to some T* successfully, obviously, this is incorrect, a correct way should be to let it fail and return error info. This patch fixed the aforementioned issue, it also enables /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling to accept such values as 't0' and 'T0', it also strictly limits /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling only to accept "*", "t*" and "T*", "*" is the throttling state value the processor can support, current, it is 0 - 7. Before applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "1xxxxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# cd / [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T100" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "2xxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T2 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% *T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "7777" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# echo "7xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# After applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# vi drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "7000" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo $? 0 [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo t0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo Tt0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: change processors from array to per_cpu variableMike Travis1-7/+7
Change processors from an array sized by NR_CPUS to a per_cpu variable. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-05-23acpi: use performance variant for_each_cpu_mask_nrMike Travis1-3/+3
Change references from for_each_cpu_mask to for_each_cpu_mask_nr where appropriate Reviewed-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-29acpi: use non-racy method for proc entries creationDenis V. Lunev1-0/+1
Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data be setup before gluing PDE to main tree. Add correct ->owner to proc_fops to fix reading/module unloading race. Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-19generic: use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr functionMike Travis1-5/+5
* Use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr() function added by previous patch, which instead of passing the "newly allowed cpus" cpumask_t arg by value, pass it by pointer: -int set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, cpumask_t new_mask) +int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const cpumask_t *new_mask) * Modify CPU_MASK_ALL Depends on: [sched-devel]: sched: add new set_cpus_allowed_ptr function Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-02-02ACPI: throttling: fix build warningLen Brown1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI: Update the t-state for every affected cpu when t-state is changedZhao Yakui1-5/+74
According to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross logical processor dependency information to OSPM. So the t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed. According to ACPI spec, three types of coordination are defined. SW_ALL, SW_ANY and HW_ALL. SW_ALL: it means that OSPM needs to initiate T-state transition on all processors in the domain. It is necessary to call throttling set function for all affected cpus. SW_ANY: it means that OSPM may initiate T-state transition on any processor in the domain. HW_ALL: Spec only says that hardware will perform the coordination and doesn't recommend how OSPM coordinate T-state among the affected cpus. So it is treated as the type of SW_ALL. It means that OSPM needs to initiate t-state transition on all the processors in the domain. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI : Add T-state event notifier functionZhao Yakui1-0/+72
The t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed.It means that OSPM should select one proper target T-state for the all affected cpus before updating T-state. So the function of acpi_processor_throttling_notifier is added. Before updating T-state it can be called for all the affected cpus to get the proper target T-state, which can meet the requirement of thermal, user and _TPC. After updating T-state, it can be called to update T-state flag. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI : Update T-state coordination after getting _TSD infoZhao Yakui1-1/+179
Accordint to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross logical processor dependency information to OSPM. After the _TSD data for all cpus are obtained, OSPM will set up the T-state coordination between CPUs. Of course if the _TSD doesn't exist or _TSD data is incorrect , it is assumed that there is no T-state coordination and T-state is changed independently. Now there is no proper solution to update T-state coordination after one cpu is hotplugged. So this patch won't support hotplugged cpu very well. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-02-02ACPI : Check parameter when calling acpi_processor_get/set_throttlingZhao Yakui1-0/+15
It is necessary to check the parameter when calling the function of acpi_processor_get/set_throttling function so as to avoid the NULL pointer reference in pr or throttling. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-15ACPI: processor: Fix null pointer dereference in throttlingAlexey Starikovskiy1-2/+2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-01ACPI: Delete the IRQ operation in throttling controll via PTCZhao Yakui1-8/+28
The IRQ operation(enable/disable) should be avoided when throttling is controlled via PTC method. It is replaced by the migration of task. This fixes an oops on T61 -- a regression due to f79f06ab9f86 b/c FixedHW support tried to read remote MSR with interrupts disabled. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: Enable MSR (FixedHW) support for T-StatesZhao Yakui1-4/+70
Add throttling control via MSR when T-states uses the FixHW Control Status registers. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: Use _TSS for throttling control, when present. Add error checks.Zhao Yakui1-7/+35
_TSS was erroneously ignored, in favor of the FADT. When TSS is used, the access width is included in the PTC control/status register. So it is unnecessary that the access bit width is multiplied by 8. At the same time the bit_offset should be considered for system I/O Access. It should be checked the bit_width and bit_offset of PTC regsiter in order to avoid the failure of system I/O access. It means that bit_width plus bit_offset can't be greater than 32. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: throttle: Change internal APIs better handle _PTCZhao Yakui1-21/+39
Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC. The following functions are concerned: acpi_read_throttling_status() acpi_write_throttling_state() acpi_get_throttling_value() acpi_get_throttling_state() Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-23 07:47:55 +0000