summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-03-20ACPI: cpufreq: Use platform devices to load ACPI PPC and PCC driversPetr Pavlu1-2/+40
The acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq drivers are loaded through per-CPU module aliases. This can result in many unnecessary load requests during boot if another frequency module, such as intel_pstate, is already active. For instance, on a typical Intel system, one can observe that udev makes 2x#CPUs attempts to insert acpi_cpufreq and 1x#CPUs attempts for pcc_cpufreq. All these tries then fail if another frequency module is already registered. In the worst case, without the recent fix in commit 0254127ab977e ("module: Don't wait for GOING modules"), these module loads occupied all udev workers and had their initialization attempts ran sequentially. Resolving all these loads then on some larger machines took too long, prevented other hardware from getting its drivers initialized and resulted in a failed boot. Discussion over these duplicate module requests ended up with a conclusion that only one load attempt should be ideally made. Both acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq drivers use platform firmware controls which are defined by ACPI. It is possible to treat these interfaces as platform devices. The patch extends the ACPI parsing logic to check the ACPI namespace if the PPC or PCC interface is present and creates a virtual platform device for each if it is available. The acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq drivers are then updated to map to these devices. This allows to try loading acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq only once during boot and only if a given interface is available in the firmware. Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com> [ rjw: whitespace and error message log level adjustments, subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-08-04ACPI: processor: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functionsSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-4/+4
The functions cpu_hotplug_begin, cpu_hotplug_done, get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() have been deprecated during the CPU hotplug rework. They map directly to cpus_write_lock(), cpus_write_unlock, cpus_read_lock() and cpus_read_unlock(). Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions with the official version. The behavior remains unchanged. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-26Merge branch 'acpi-misc'Rafael J. Wysocki1-13/+5
* acpi-misc: ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: fix various typos in comments
2021-04-08ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issuesXiaofei Tan1-13/+5
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including the following types: ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: labels should not be indented Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-03-08ACPI: processor: Get rid of ACPICA message printingRafael J. Wysocki1-21/+12
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and the format of those messages is also special and convoluted. For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending on the context in which they appear. Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going to be necessary any more. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
2020-10-16ACPI: processor: remove comment regarding string _UID supportAlex Hung1-1/+0
ACPI 6.3 Errata A no longer allows _UID to return a string except for Itanium (for historical reasons) as stated in section 5.2.12: "From ACPI Specification 6.3 onward, all processor objects for all architectures except Itanium must now use Device() objects with an _HID of ACPI0007, and use only integer _UID values." Therefore, the "we don't handle string _UIDs yet" comment, which implies a missing feature, is redundant, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-09-21ACPI: processor: Print more information when acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() failsChen Yu1-6/+28
Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause unexpectd behavior in the CPU idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format. Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failes. This can be used to help narrow down why the CPU idle driver fails to behave as expected. Suggested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-07-09ACPI: Use fallthrough pseudo-keywordGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through # [1] Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-12-27ACPI: processor: Export acpi_processor_evaluate_cst()Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+157
The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently and it will need to call acpi_processor_evaluate_cst(), so move that function to acpi_processor.c so that it is always present (which is required by intel_idle) and export it to modules to allow the ACPI processor driver (which is modular) to call it. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-12-16ACPI: processor: Export function to claim _CST controlRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+25
The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently and it will need to notify the platform firmware of that if acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control is set, so add a routine for this purpose, acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(), to acpi_processor.c (so that it is always present which is required by intel_idle) and export it to allow the ACPI processor driver (which is modular) to call it. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-09ACPI / processor: don't print errors for processorIDs == 0xffJiri Slaby1-3/+7
Some platforms define their processors in this manner: Device (SCK0) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0004" /* Module Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID Name (_UID, "CPUSCK0") // _UID: Unique ID Processor (CP00, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP01, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP02, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP03, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP04, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP05, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP06, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP07, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP08, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP09, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0A, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0B, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} ... The processors marked as 0xff are invalid, there are only 8 of them in this case. So do not print an error on ids == 0xff, just print an info message. Actually, we could return ENODEV even on the first CPU with ID 0xff, but ACPI spec does not forbid the 0xff value to be a processor ID. Given 0xff could be a correct one, we would break working systems if we returned ENODEV. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500Thomas Gleixner1-4/+1
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-10-04ACPI / processor: Fix the return value of acpi_processor_ids_walk()Dou Liyang1-3/+4
ACPI driver should make sure all the processor IDs in their ACPI Namespace are unique. the driver performs a depth-first walk of the namespace tree and calls the acpi_processor_ids_walk() to check the duplicate IDs. But, the acpi_processor_ids_walk() mistakes the return value. If a processor is checked, it returns true which causes the walk break immediately, and other processors will never be checked. Repace the value with AE_OK which is the standard acpi_status value. And don't abort the namespace walk even on error. Fixes: 8c8cb30f49b8 (acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumeration) Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-11-09ACPI: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-08-24ACPI / processor: make function acpi_processor_check_duplicates() staticColin Ian King1-1/+1
The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates() is local to the source and does not need to be in global scope, so make it static. Cleans up sparse warnings: symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-04-18ACPI / Processor: Drop setup_max_cpus check from acpi_processor_add()Prakash, Prashanth1-5/+0
When maxcpus=X kernel argument is used, we parse the ACPI tables only for the first X cpus. The per-cpu ACPI data include the _PSD tables which gives information about related cpus. cppc_cpufreq and acpi-cpufreq parses the table once during init to deduce the related cpus. If a user brings a new cpu online after boot the related cpu data becomes incorrect. acpi_get_psd_map() in acpi_cppc.c returns error if it fails to find the parsed ACPI data for possible CPU resulting in cppc_cpufreq initialization failure. With this change we will probe all possible CPUs prior to cpufreq initialization, but will bring only setup_max_cpus online. nr_cpus kernel parameter can be used to restict even parsing per-cpu ACPI tables. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-11acpi/processor: Check for duplicate processor ids at hotplug timeDou Liyang1-3/+10
The check for duplicate processor ids happens at boot time based on the ACPI table contents, but the final sanity checks for a processor happen at hotplug time. At hotplug time, where the physical information is available, which might differ from the ACPI table information, a check for duplicate processor ids is missing. Add it to the hotplug checks and rename the function so it better reflects its purpose. Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: guzheng1@huawei.com Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-6-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-03-11acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumerationDou Liyang1-7/+32
ACPI allows to declare processors either with the PROCESSOR or with the DEVICE operator. The current implementation handles only the PROCESSOR operator. On a system which uses the DEVICE operator for processor enumeration the evaluation fails. Check for the ACPI type of the ACPI handle and evaluate PROCESSOR and DEVICE types separately. Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: guzheng1@huawei.com Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-03-11Revert "x86/acpi: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when booting"Dou Liyang1-5/+0
Revert: dc6db24d2476 ("x86/acpi: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when booting") The mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" is established at boot time via ACPI tables to keep associations of workqueues and other node related items consistent across cpu hotplug. But, ACPI tables are unreliable and failures with that boot time mapping have been reported on machines where the ACPI table and the physical information which is retrieved at actual hotplug is inconsistent. Revert the mapping implementation so it can be replaced with a less error prone approach. Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: guzheng1@huawei.com Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-2-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-02-07x86/ACPI: keep x86_cpu_to_acpiid mapping valid on CPU hotplugVitaly Kuznetsov1-2/+2
We may or may not have all possible CPUs in MADT on boot but in any case we're overwriting x86_cpu_to_acpiid mapping with U32_MAX when acpi_register_lapic() is called again on the CPU hotplug path: acpi_processor_hotadd_init() -> acpi_map_cpu() -> acpi_register_lapic() As we have the required acpi_id information in acpi_processor_hotadd_init() propagate it to acpi_map_cpu() to always keep x86_cpu_to_acpiid mapping valid. Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-21acpi: Validate processor id when mapping the processorDou Liyang1-0/+15
When we want to identify whether the proc_id is unreasonable or not, we can call the "acpi_processor_validate_proc_id" function. It will search in the duplicate IDs. If we find the proc_id in the IDs, we return true to the call function. Conversely, the false represents available. When we establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping to handle the cpu hotplugs, we will use the proc_id from ACPI table. We do validation when we get the proc_id. If the result is true, we will stop the mapping. [ tglx: Mark the new function __init ] Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com Cc: len.brown@intel.com Cc: rafael@kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: cl@linux.com Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-8-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21acpi: Provide mechanism to validate processors in the ACPI tablesDou Liyang1-0/+79
[Problem] When we set cpuid <-> nodeid mapping to be persistent, it will use the DSDT As we know, the ACPI tables are just like user's input in that respect, and we don't crash if user's input is unreasonable. Such as, the mapping of the proc_id and pxm in some machine's ACPI table is like this: proc_id | pxm -------------------- 0 <-> 0 1 <-> 0 2 <-> 1 3 <-> 1 89 <-> 0 89 <-> 0 89 <-> 0 89 <-> 1 89 <-> 1 89 <-> 2 89 <-> 3 ..... We can't be sure which one is correct to the proc_id 89. We may map a wrong node to a cpu. When pages are allocated, this may cause a kernal panic. So, we should provide mechanisms to validate the ACPI tables, just like we do validation to check user's input in web project. The mechanism is that the processor objects which have the duplicate IDs are not valid. [Solution] We add a validation function, like this: foreach Processor in DSDT proc_id = get_ACPI_Processor_number(Processor) if (proc_id exists ) mark both of them as being unreasonable; The function will record the unique or duplicate processor IDs. The duplicate processor IDs such as 89 are regarded as the unreasonable IDs which mean that the processor objects in question are not valid. [ tglx: Add __init[data] annotations ] Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com Cc: len.brown@intel.com Cc: rafael@kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: cl@linux.com Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-7-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21x86/acpi: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when bootingGu Zheng1-0/+5
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that, when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such as wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem. It contains 4 steps: 1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle both enabled and disabled cpus. 2. Introduce a new array storing all possible cpuid <-> apicid mapping. 3. Enable _MAT and MADT relative apis to return non-present or disabled cpus' apicid. 4. Establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping. This patch finishes step 4. This patch set the persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all enabled/disabled processors at boot time via an additional acpi namespace walk for processors. [ tglx: Remove the unneeded exports ] Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com Cc: len.brown@intel.com Cc: rafael@kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: cl@linux.com Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-6-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-09-21x86/acpi: Enable MADT APIs to return disabled apicidsGu Zheng1-1/+4
The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that, when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such as wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem. It contains 4 steps: 1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle both enabled and disabled cpus. 2. Introduce a new array storing all possible cpuid <-> apicid mapping. 3. Enable _MAT and MADT relative apis to return non-present or disabled cpus' apicid. 4. Establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping. This patch finishes step 3. There are four mappings in the kernel: 1. nodeid (logical node id) <-> pxm (persistent) 2. apicid (physical cpu id) <-> nodeid (persistent) 3. cpuid (logical cpu id) <-> apicid (not persistent, now persistent by step 2) 4. cpuid (logical cpu id) <-> nodeid (not persistent) So, in order to setup persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all possible CPUs, we should: 1. Setup cpuid <-> apicid mapping for all possible CPUs, which has been done in step 1, 2. 2. Setup cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all possible CPUs. But before that, we should obtain all apicids from MADT. All processors' apicids can be obtained by _MAT method or from MADT in ACPI. The current code ignores disabled processors and returns -ENODEV. After this patch, a new parameter will be added to MADT APIs so that caller is able to control if disabled processors are ignored. Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com Cc: len.brown@intel.com Cc: rafael@kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: cl@linux.com Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-06-02ACPI / processor: Avoid reserving IO regions too earlyRafael J. Wysocki1-9/+0
Roland Dreier reports that one of his systems cannot boot because of the changes made by commit ac212b6980d8 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure). The problematic part of it is the request_region() call in acpi_processor_get_info() that used to run at module init time before the above commit and now it runs much earlier. Unfortunately, the region(s) reserved by it fall into a range the PCI subsystem attempts to reserve for AHCI IO BARs. As a result, the PCI reservation fails and AHCI doesn't work, while previously the PCI reservation would be made before acpi_processor_get_info() and it would succeed. That request_region() call, however, was overlooked by commit ac212b6980d8, as it is not necessary for the enumeration of the processors. It only is needed when the ACPI processor driver actually attempts to handle them which doesn't happen before loading the ACPI processor driver module. Therefore that call should have been moved from acpi_processor_get_info() into that module. Address the problem by moving the request_region() call in question out of acpi_processor_get_info() and use the observation that the region reserved by it is only needed if the FADT-based CPU throttling method is going to be used, which means that it should be sufficient to invoke it from acpi_processor_get_throttling_fadt(). Fixes: ac212b6980d8 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure) Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Tested-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-26ACPI / processor: Request native thermal interrupt handling via _OSCSrinivas Pandruvada1-0/+52
There are several reports of freeze on enabling HWP (Hardware PStates) feature on Skylake-based systems by the Intel P-states driver. The root cause is identified as the HWP interrupts causing BIOS code to freeze. HWP interrupts use the thermal LVT which can be handled by Linux natively, but on the affected Skylake-based systems SMM will respond to it by default. This is a problem for several reasons: - On the affected systems the SMM thermal LVT handler is broken (it will crash when invoked) and a BIOS update is necessary to fix it. - With thermal interrupt handled in SMM we lose all of the reporting features of the arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt driver. - Some thermal drivers like x86-package-temp depend on the thermal threshold interrupts signaled via the thermal LVT. - The HWP interrupts are useful for debugging and tuning performance (if the kernel can handle them). The native handling of thermal interrupts needs to be enabled because of that. This requires some way to tell SMM that the OS can handle thermal interrupts. That can be done by using _OSC/_PDC in processor scope very early during ACPI initialization. The meaning of _OSC/_PDC bit 12 in processor scope is whether or not the OS supports native handling of interrupts for Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) notifications. Since on HWP-capable systems CPPC is a firmware interface to HWP, setting this bit effectively tells the firmware that the OS will handle thermal interrupts natively going forward. For details on _OSC/_PDC refer to: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/standards/processor-vendor-specific-acpi-specification.html To implement the _OSC/_PDC handshake as described, introduce a new function, acpi_early_processor_osc(), that walks the ACPI namespace looking for ACPI processor objects and invokes _OSC for them with bit 12 in the capabilities buffer set and terminates the namespace walk on the first success. Also modify intel_thermal_interrupt() to clear HWP status bits in the HWP_STATUS MSR to acknowledge HWP interrupts (which prevents them from firing continuously). Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Subject & changelog, function rename ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-22ACPI / processor : add support for ACPI0010 processor containerSudeep Holla1-0/+17
ACPI 6.0 adds support for optional processor container device which may contain child objects that are either processor devices or other processor containers. This allows representing hierarchical processor topologies. It is declared using the _HID of ACPI0010. It is an abstract container used to represent CPU topology and should not be used to hotplug purposes. If no matching handler is found for a device in acpi_scan_attach_handler, acpi_bus_attach does a default enumeration for those devices with valid HID in the acpi namespace. This patch adds a scan handler for these ACPI processor containers to avoid default that enumeration and ensures the platform devices are not created for them. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-12ACPI: Add weak routines for ACPI CPU HotplugAshwin Chaugule1-0/+18
Add weak functions for architectures which do not support hot-adding and removing CPUs which aren't detected at bootup. (e.g. via MADT). This helps preserve the Kconfig dependency from: commit cbfc1bae55bb ("[ACPI] ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU Kconfig dependency update") prevent: HOTPLUG_CPU=y ACPI_PROCESSOR=y ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=n Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-21ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotationsMathias Krause1-1/+1
The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used to be prior to commit fe7bf106ebc2 ("acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from all acpi files") due to the __cpuinit annotation of acpi_processor_add(). But with that commit in place that requirement has gone. The same is true for the acpi_cpu_notifier notifier block. acpi_cpu_soft_notify() used to be marked __cpuinit but lost its annotation in the above mentioned commit as well. Therefore the __refdata annotation isn't needed there either. Just drop the unneded __refdata annotations to be able to catch future section mismatches. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid()Hanjun Guo1-2/+2
Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid physical ID, then used it as replacement of the direct comparisons with PHYS_CPUID_INVALID. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13ACPI / processor: remove phys_id in acpi_processor_get_info()Hanjun Guo1-4/+3
Use pr->phys_id to replace phys_id to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13ACPI / processor: remove cpu_index in acpi_processor_get_info()Hanjun Guo1-6/+4
Just use pr->id instead of cpu_index to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-13ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_logical_cpuid()Hanjun Guo1-2/+3
In ACPI processor drivers, we use direct comparisons of cpu logical id with -1 which are error prone in case logical cpuid is accidentally assinged an error code and prevents us from returning an error-encoding cpuid directly in some cases. So introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid logical cpu num, then it will be used to replace the direct comparisons with -1. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-03-26ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware IDCatalin Marinas1-3/+4
CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor, but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to some inconsistence for the drivers. Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU ids a generic CPU physical id type is required. So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver, and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID in the following patch. CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes] Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-01-05ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu()Hanjun Guo1-3/+3
acpi_map_lsapic() will allocate a logical CPU number and map it to physical CPU id (such as APIC id) for the hot-added CPU, it will also do some mapping for NUMA node id and etc, acpi_unmap_lsapic() will do the reverse. We can see that the name of the function is a little bit confusing and arch (IA64) dependent so rename them as acpi_(un)map_cpu() to make arch agnostic and explicit. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-01-05ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnosticHanjun Guo1-9/+12
apic_id in MADT table is the CPU hardware id which identify it self in the system for x86 and ia64, OSPM will use it for SMP init to map APIC ID to logical cpu number in the early boot, when the DSDT/SSDT (ACPI namespace) is scanned later, the ACPI processor driver is probed and the driver will use acpi_id in DSDT to get the apic_id, then map to the logical cpu number which is needed by the processor driver. Before ACPI 5.0, only x86 and ia64 were supported in ACPI spec, so apic_id is used both in arch code and ACPI core which is pretty fine. Since ACPI 5.0, ARM is supported by ACPI and APIC is not available on ARM, this will confuse people when apic_id is both used by x86 and ARM in one function. So convert apic_id to phys_id (which is the original meaning) in ACPI processor dirver to make it arch agnostic, but leave the arch dependent code unchanged, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-21ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core codeGraeme Gregory1-1/+1
Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific values can not be used in core ACPI code. Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c, on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic is not a suitable value for ARM64. What is actually important at this point is if there is/are CPU entry/entries (Local APIC/SAPIC, GICC) in MADT, so introduce acpi_has_cpu_in_madt() to be arch specific and generic. Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-16ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present during initializationBaoquan He1-1/+1
In acpi_processor_get_info(), ACPI processor info is initialized including ID, namely CPU index. Currently, on a UP system running an SMP kerenl with no LAPIC in the MADT, cpu0_initialized is checked to decide whether or not the CPU has been initialized. However, this check may not be sufficient for kdump kernels. Most of time only 1 CPU is supported because of known problems in kdump kernels. So say the multiple CPUs are present in the boot kernel and a crash happens on one specific CPU, say CPU2. Then it jumps into the kdump kernel with "nr_cpus=1" in the command line. In this situation, the kdump kernel will reuse the ACPI resources from the crashed kernel directly. That means all LAPIC instances are enabled in the MADT while only one CPU is in use. In the kdump kernel, x86_cpu_to_apicid contains the correct APIC ID and it's related to the CPU ID. If cpu0_initialized is checked only, 0 will be used as the CPU index instead of that APIC ID, which is not correct. In addition to checking cpu0_initialized, check acpi_lapic. If acpi_lapic is 0, then no LAPIC is available from the MADT and the system should be treated as a UP one without a LAPIC (that is, assign 0 to the CPU index). Otherwise, use the original (valid) CPU index. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> [rjw: Subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-08ACPI / processor: do not mark present at boot but not onlined CPU as onlinedIgor Mammedov1-1/+0
acpi_processor_add() assumes that present at boot CPUs are always onlined, it is not so if a CPU failed to become onlined. As result acpi_processor_add() will mark such CPU device as onlined in sysfs and following attempts to online/offline it using /sys/device/system/cpu/cpuX/online attribute will fail. Do not poke into device internals in acpi_processor_add() and touch "struct device { .offline }" attribute, since for CPUs onlined at boot it's set by: topology_init() -> arch_register_cpu() -> register_cpu() before ACPI device tree is parsed, and for hotplugged CPUs it's set when userspace onlines CPU via sysfs. Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Cc: 3.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-01ACPI / processor: Fix failure of loading acpi-cpufreq driverLan Tianyu1-3/+4
According commit d640113fe (ACPI: processor: fix acpi_get_cpuid for UP processor), BIOS may not provide _MAT or MADT tables and acpi_get_apicid() always returns -1. For these cases, original code will pass apic_id with vaule of -1 to acpi_map_cpuid() and it will check the acpi_id. If acpi_id is equal to zero, ignores apic_id and return zero for CPU0. Commit b981513 (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU) changed the behavior. Return ENODEV when find apic_id is less than zero after calling acpi_get_apicid(). This causes acpi-cpufreq driver fails to be loaded on some machines. This patch is to fix it. Fixes: b981513f806d (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781 Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Reported-and-tested-by: KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> Reported-and-tested-by: Stuart Foster <smf.linux@ntlworld.com> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-29Merge branches 'acpi-processor', 'acpi-hotplug', 'acpi-init', 'acpi-pm' and ↵Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
'acpica' * acpi-processor: ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID" ACPI / processor: Return specific error value when mapping lapic id * acpi-hotplug: ACPI / scan: Clear match_driver flag in acpi_bus_trim() * acpi-init: ACPI / init: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API * acpi-pm: ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI companions of devices * acpica: ACPICA: Remove bool usage from ACPICA.
2014-01-27ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID"Jiang Liu1-1/+1
Commit b981513f806d (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU) emits an error message if ACPI processor driver fails to query APIC ID for the CPU. Originally it's designed to catch BIOS bugs for CPU hot-addition. But it accidently reveals another type of BIOS bug that: 1) BIOS implements ACPI objects for all possible instead of present CPUs. (It's valid to do that per ACPI specification.) 2) BIOS doesn't implement the _STA method for CPU objects. OSPM assumes that all CPU objects are present and functioning and attempts to use those CPU objects for CPU enumeration, which then triggers the error message. According to ACPI spec, BIOS should implement _STA for those absent CPUs at least. Though it's a BIOS bug in essential, there are some BIOSes in the fields which are implmented in this way. So reduce the log level from ERR to DEBUG to accommodate these existing BIOSes. Fixes: b981513f806d (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU) Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-12Merge branches 'acpi-gpe', 'acpi-video', 'acpi-thermal', 'acpi-processor', ↵Rafael J. Wysocki1-10/+14
'acpi-sleep' * acpi-gpe: ACPI / EC: disable GPE before removing GPE handler ACPI / Button: Fix enabling button GPEs twice * acpi-video: ACPI: Blacklist Win8 OSI for some HP laptop 2013 models ACPI / video: Fix typo in video_detect.c * acpi-thermal: ACPI / thermal: remove const from thermal_zone_device_ops declaration * acpi-processor: ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU * acpi-sleep: ACPI / sleep: remove panic in case hardware has changed after S4
2014-01-11ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPUJiang Liu1-10/+14
Enhance ACPI CPU hotplug driver to print clear error message and bail out early if BIOS returns wrong value in ACPI MADT table or _MAT method. Otherwise it will add the CPU device even if failed to get APIC ID and fails any operations against sysfs interface: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-07ACPI / bind: Pass struct acpi_device pointer to acpi_bind_one()Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
There is no reason to pass an ACPI handle to acpi_bind_one() instead of a struct acpi_device pointer to the target device object, so modify that function to take a struct acpi_device pointer as its second argument and update all code depending on it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
2013-10-28Merge branch 'acpi-processor'Rafael J. Wysocki1-16/+6
* acpi-processor: ACPI / processor: fixed a brace coding style issue ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info() x86 / ACPI: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id
2013-09-24ACPI / processor: Remove outdated commentsHanjun Guo1-5/+0
acpi_get_processor_id() can be find nowhere, and the acpi id is synchronized to APIC id when acpi_get_cpuid() is called, so the comments can be removed. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) checkHanjun Guo1-6/+2
acpi_processor_errata() is only called in acpi_processor_get_info(), and the argument 'pr' passed to acpi_processor_errata() will never be NULL, so the if (!pr) check is unnecessary and can be removed. Since the 'pr' argument is not used by acpi_processor_errata() any more, so change the argument into void too. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info()Jiang Liu1-3/+0
errata.smp is used by nowhere, so the variable assignment is meanless, remove it. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluationJiang Liu1-1/+1
Since APIC id is saved in processor struct, just use it and remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>