diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/uapi/linux/inet_diag.h | 13 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/Kconfig | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/Makefile | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 896 |
4 files changed, 928 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/inet_diag.h b/include/uapi/linux/inet_diag.h index b5c366f87b3e..509cd961068d 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/inet_diag.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/inet_diag.h @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ enum { INET_DIAG_PEERS, INET_DIAG_PAD, INET_DIAG_MARK, + INET_DIAG_BBRINFO, __INET_DIAG_MAX, }; @@ -157,8 +158,20 @@ struct tcp_dctcp_info { __u32 dctcp_ab_tot; }; +/* INET_DIAG_BBRINFO */ + +struct tcp_bbr_info { + /* u64 bw: max-filtered BW (app throughput) estimate in Byte per sec: */ + __u32 bbr_bw_lo; /* lower 32 bits of bw */ + __u32 bbr_bw_hi; /* upper 32 bits of bw */ + __u32 bbr_min_rtt; /* min-filtered RTT in uSec */ + __u32 bbr_pacing_gain; /* pacing gain shifted left 8 bits */ + __u32 bbr_cwnd_gain; /* cwnd gain shifted left 8 bits */ +}; + union tcp_cc_info { struct tcpvegas_info vegas; struct tcp_dctcp_info dctcp; + struct tcp_bbr_info bbr; }; #endif /* _UAPI_INET_DIAG_H_ */ diff --git a/net/ipv4/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/Kconfig index 50d6a9b49f6c..300b06888fdf 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/Kconfig +++ b/net/ipv4/Kconfig @@ -640,6 +640,21 @@ config TCP_CONG_CDG D.A. Hayes and G. Armitage. "Revisiting TCP congestion control using delay gradients." In Networking 2011. Preprint: http://goo.gl/No3vdg +config TCP_CONG_BBR + tristate "BBR TCP" + default n + ---help--- + + BBR (Bottleneck Bandwidth and RTT) TCP congestion control aims to + maximize network utilization and minimize queues. It builds an explicit + model of the the bottleneck delivery rate and path round-trip + propagation delay. It tolerates packet loss and delay unrelated to + congestion. It can operate over LAN, WAN, cellular, wifi, or cable + modem links. It can coexist with flows that use loss-based congestion + control, and can operate with shallow buffers, deep buffers, + bufferbloat, policers, or AQM schemes that do not provide a delay + signal. It requires the fq ("Fair Queue") pacing packet scheduler. + choice prompt "Default TCP congestion control" default DEFAULT_CUBIC @@ -674,6 +689,9 @@ choice config DEFAULT_CDG bool "CDG" if TCP_CONG_CDG=y + config DEFAULT_BBR + bool "BBR" if TCP_CONG_BBR=y + config DEFAULT_RENO bool "Reno" endchoice diff --git a/net/ipv4/Makefile b/net/ipv4/Makefile index 9cfff1a0bf71..bc6a6c8b9bcd 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/Makefile +++ b/net/ipv4/Makefile @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INET_DIAG) += inet_diag.o obj-$(CONFIG_INET_TCP_DIAG) += tcp_diag.o obj-$(CONFIG_INET_UDP_DIAG) += udp_diag.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_TCPPROBE) += tcp_probe.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR) += tcp_bbr.o obj-$(CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC) += tcp_bic.o obj-$(CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CDG) += tcp_cdg.o obj-$(CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CUBIC) += tcp_cubic.o diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0ea66c2c9344 --- /dev/null +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c @@ -0,0 +1,896 @@ +/* Bottleneck Bandwidth and RTT (BBR) congestion control + * + * BBR congestion control computes the sending rate based on the delivery + * rate (throughput) estimated from ACKs. In a nutshell: + * + * On each ACK, update our model of the network path: + * bottleneck_bandwidth = windowed_max(delivered / elapsed, 10 round trips) + * min_rtt = windowed_min(rtt, 10 seconds) + * pacing_rate = pacing_gain * bottleneck_bandwidth + * cwnd = max(cwnd_gain * bottleneck_bandwidth * min_rtt, 4) + * + * The core algorithm does not react directly to packet losses or delays, + * although BBR may adjust the size of next send per ACK when loss is + * observed, or adjust the sending rate if it estimates there is a + * traffic policer, in order to keep the drop rate reasonable. + * + * BBR is described in detail in: + * "BBR: Congestion-Based Congestion Control", + * Neal Cardwell, Yuchung Cheng, C. Stephen Gunn, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh, + * Van Jacobson. ACM Queue, Vol. 14 No. 5, September-October 2016. + * + * There is a public e-mail list for discussing BBR development and testing: + * https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/bbr-dev + * + * NOTE: BBR *must* be used with the fq qdisc ("man tc-fq") with pacing enabled, + * since pacing is integral to the BBR design and implementation. + * BBR without pacing would not function properly, and may incur unnecessary + * high packet loss rates. + */ +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <net/tcp.h> +#include <linux/inet_diag.h> +#include <linux/inet.h> +#include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/win_minmax.h> + +/* Scale factor for rate in pkt/uSec unit to avoid truncation in bandwidth + * estimation. The rate unit ~= (1500 bytes / 1 usec / 2^24) ~= 715 bps. + * This handles bandwidths from 0.06pps (715bps) to 256Mpps (3Tbps) in a u32. + * Since the minimum window is >=4 packets, the lower bound isn't + * an issue. The upper bound isn't an issue with existing technologies. + */ +#define BW_SCALE 24 +#define BW_UNIT (1 << BW_SCALE) + +#define BBR_SCALE 8 /* scaling factor for fractions in BBR (e.g. gains) */ +#define BBR_UNIT (1 << BBR_SCALE) + +/* BBR has the following modes for deciding how fast to send: */ +enum bbr_mode { + BBR_STARTUP, /* ramp up sending rate rapidly to fill pipe */ + BBR_DRAIN, /* drain any queue created during startup */ + BBR_PROBE_BW, /* discover, share bw: pace around estimated bw */ + BBR_PROBE_RTT, /* cut cwnd to min to probe min_rtt */ +}; + +/* BBR congestion control block */ +struct bbr { + u32 min_rtt_us; /* min RTT in min_rtt_win_sec window */ + u32 min_rtt_stamp; /* timestamp of min_rtt_us */ + u32 probe_rtt_done_stamp; /* end time for BBR_PROBE_RTT mode */ + struct minmax bw; /* Max recent delivery rate in pkts/uS << 24 */ + u32 rtt_cnt; /* count of packet-timed rounds elapsed */ + u32 next_rtt_delivered; /* scb->tx.delivered at end of round */ + struct skb_mstamp cycle_mstamp; /* time of this cycle phase start */ + u32 mode:3, /* current bbr_mode in state machine */ + prev_ca_state:3, /* CA state on previous ACK */ + packet_conservation:1, /* use packet conservation? */ + restore_cwnd:1, /* decided to revert cwnd to old value */ + round_start:1, /* start of packet-timed tx->ack round? */ + tso_segs_goal:7, /* segments we want in each skb we send */ + idle_restart:1, /* restarting after idle? */ + probe_rtt_round_done:1, /* a BBR_PROBE_RTT round at 4 pkts? */ + unused:5, + lt_is_sampling:1, /* taking long-term ("LT") samples now? */ + lt_rtt_cnt:7, /* round trips in long-term interval */ + lt_use_bw:1; /* use lt_bw as our bw estimate? */ + u32 lt_bw; /* LT est delivery rate in pkts/uS << 24 */ + u32 lt_last_delivered; /* LT intvl start: tp->delivered */ + u32 lt_last_stamp; /* LT intvl start: tp->delivered_mstamp */ + u32 lt_last_lost; /* LT intvl start: tp->lost */ + u32 pacing_gain:10, /* current gain for setting pacing rate */ + cwnd_gain:10, /* current gain for setting cwnd */ + full_bw_cnt:3, /* number of rounds without large bw gains */ + cycle_idx:3, /* current index in pacing_gain cycle array */ + unused_b:6; + u32 prior_cwnd; /* prior cwnd upon entering loss recovery */ + u32 full_bw; /* recent bw, to estimate if pipe is full */ +}; + +#define CYCLE_LEN 8 /* number of phases in a pacing gain cycle */ + +/* Window length of bw filter (in rounds): */ +static const int bbr_bw_rtts = CYCLE_LEN + 2; +/* Window length of min_rtt filter (in sec): */ +static const u32 bbr_min_rtt_win_sec = 10; +/* Minimum time (in ms) spent at bbr_cwnd_min_target in BBR_PROBE_RTT mode: */ +static const u32 bbr_probe_rtt_mode_ms = 200; +/* Skip TSO below the following bandwidth (bits/sec): */ +static const int bbr_min_tso_rate = 1200000; + +/* We use a high_gain value of 2/ln(2) because it's the smallest pacing gain + * that will allow a smoothly increasing pacing rate that will double each RTT + * and send the same number of packets per RTT that an un-paced, slow-starting + * Reno or CUBIC flow would: + */ +static const int bbr_high_gain = BBR_UNIT * 2885 / 1000 + 1; +/* The pacing gain of 1/high_gain in BBR_DRAIN is calculated to typically drain + * the queue created in BBR_STARTUP in a single round: + */ +static const int bbr_drain_gain = BBR_UNIT * 1000 / 2885; +/* The gain for deriving steady-state cwnd tolerates delayed/stretched ACKs: */ +static const int bbr_cwnd_gain = BBR_UNIT * 2; +/* The pacing_gain values for the PROBE_BW gain cycle, to discover/share bw: */ +static const int bbr_pacing_gain[] = { + BBR_UNIT * 5 / 4, /* probe for more available bw */ + BBR_UNIT * 3 / 4, /* drain queue and/or yield bw to other flows */ + BBR_UNIT, BBR_UNIT, BBR_UNIT, /* cruise at 1.0*bw to utilize pipe, */ + BBR_UNIT, BBR_UNIT, BBR_UNIT /* without creating excess queue... */ +}; +/* Randomize the starting gain cycling phase over N phases: */ +static const u32 bbr_cycle_rand = 7; + +/* Try to keep at least this many packets in flight, if things go smoothly. For + * smooth functioning, a sliding window protocol ACKing every other packet + * needs at least 4 packets in flight: + */ +static const u32 bbr_cwnd_min_target = 4; + +/* To estimate if BBR_STARTUP mode (i.e. high_gain) has filled pipe... */ +/* If bw has increased significantly (1.25x), there may be more bw available: */ +static const u32 bbr_full_bw_thresh = BBR_UNIT * 5 / 4; +/* But after 3 rounds w/o significant bw growth, estimate pipe is full: */ +static const u32 bbr_full_bw_cnt = 3; + +/* "long-term" ("LT") bandwidth estimator parameters... */ +/* The minimum number of rounds in an LT bw sampling interval: */ +static const u32 bbr_lt_intvl_min_rtts = 4; +/* If lost/delivered ratio > 20%, interval is "lossy" and we may be policed: */ +static const u32 bbr_lt_loss_thresh = 50; +/* If 2 intervals have a bw ratio <= 1/8, their bw is "consistent": */ +static const u32 bbr_lt_bw_ratio = BBR_UNIT / 8; +/* If 2 intervals have a bw diff <= 4 Kbit/sec their bw is "consistent": */ +static const u32 bbr_lt_bw_diff = 4000 / 8; +/* If we estimate we're policed, use lt_bw for this many round trips: */ +static const u32 bbr_lt_bw_max_rtts = 48; + +/* Do we estimate that STARTUP filled the pipe? */ +static bool bbr_full_bw_reached(const struct sock *sk) +{ + const struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + return bbr->full_bw_cnt >= bbr_full_bw_cnt; +} + +/* Return the windowed max recent bandwidth sample, in pkts/uS << BW_SCALE. */ +static u32 bbr_max_bw(const struct sock *sk) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + return minmax_get(&bbr->bw); +} + +/* Return the estimated bandwidth of the path, in pkts/uS << BW_SCALE. */ +static u32 bbr_bw(const struct sock *sk) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + return bbr->lt_use_bw ? bbr->lt_bw : bbr_max_bw(sk); +} + +/* Return rate in bytes per second, optionally with a gain. + * The order here is chosen carefully to avoid overflow of u64. This should + * work for input rates of up to 2.9Tbit/sec and gain of 2.89x. + */ +static u64 bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(struct sock *sk, u64 rate, int gain) +{ + rate *= tcp_mss_to_mtu(sk, tcp_sk(sk)->mss_cache); + rate *= gain; + rate >>= BBR_SCALE; + rate *= USEC_PER_SEC; + return rate >> BW_SCALE; +} + +/* Pace using current bw estimate and a gain factor. In order to help drive the + * network toward lower queues while maintaining high utilization and low + * latency, the average pacing rate aims to be slightly (~1%) lower than the + * estimated bandwidth. This is an important aspect of the design. In this + * implementation this slightly lower pacing rate is achieved implicitly by not + * including link-layer headers in the packet size used for the pacing rate. + */ +static void bbr_set_pacing_rate(struct sock *sk, u32 bw, int gain) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u64 rate = bw; + + rate = bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(sk, rate, gain); + rate = min_t(u64, rate, sk->sk_max_pacing_rate); + if (bbr->mode != BBR_STARTUP || rate > sk->sk_pacing_rate) + sk->sk_pacing_rate = rate; +} + +/* Return count of segments we want in the skbs we send, or 0 for default. */ +static u32 bbr_tso_segs_goal(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + return bbr->tso_segs_goal; +} + +static void bbr_set_tso_segs_goal(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 min_segs; + + min_segs = sk->sk_pacing_rate < (bbr_min_tso_rate >> 3) ? 1 : 2; + bbr->tso_segs_goal = min(tcp_tso_autosize(sk, tp->mss_cache, min_segs), + 0x7FU); +} + +/* Save "last known good" cwnd so we can restore it after losses or PROBE_RTT */ +static void bbr_save_cwnd(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + if (bbr->prev_ca_state < TCP_CA_Recovery && bbr->mode != BBR_PROBE_RTT) + bbr->prior_cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd; /* this cwnd is good enough */ + else /* loss recovery or BBR_PROBE_RTT have temporarily cut cwnd */ + bbr->prior_cwnd = max(bbr->prior_cwnd, tp->snd_cwnd); +} + +static void bbr_cwnd_event(struct sock *sk, enum tcp_ca_event event) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + if (event == CA_EVENT_TX_START && tp->app_limited) { + bbr->idle_restart = 1; + /* Avoid pointless buffer overflows: pace at est. bw if we don't + * need more speed (we're restarting from idle and app-limited). + */ + if (bbr->mode == BBR_PROBE_BW) + bbr_set_pacing_rate(sk, bbr_bw(sk), BBR_UNIT); + } +} + +/* Find target cwnd. Right-size the cwnd based on min RTT and the + * estimated bottleneck bandwidth: + * + * cwnd = bw * min_rtt * gain = BDP * gain + * + * The key factor, gain, controls the amount of queue. While a small gain + * builds a smaller queue, it becomes more vulnerable to noise in RTT + * measurements (e.g., delayed ACKs or other ACK compression effects). This + * noise may cause BBR to under-estimate the rate. + * + * To achieve full performance in high-speed paths, we budget enough cwnd to + * fit full-sized skbs in-flight on both end hosts to fully utilize the path: + * - one skb in sending host Qdisc, + * - one skb in sending host TSO/GSO engine + * - one skb being received by receiver host LRO/GRO/delayed-ACK engine + * Don't worry, at low rates (bbr_min_tso_rate) this won't bloat cwnd because + * in such cases tso_segs_goal is 1. The minimum cwnd is 4 packets, + * which allows 2 outstanding 2-packet sequences, to try to keep pipe + * full even with ACK-every-other-packet delayed ACKs. + */ +static u32 bbr_target_cwnd(struct sock *sk, u32 bw, int gain) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 cwnd; + u64 w; + + /* If we've never had a valid RTT sample, cap cwnd at the initial + * default. This should only happen when the connection is not using TCP + * timestamps and has retransmitted all of the SYN/SYNACK/data packets + * ACKed so far. In this case, an RTO can cut cwnd to 1, in which + * case we need to slow-start up toward something safe: TCP_INIT_CWND. + */ + if (unlikely(bbr->min_rtt_us == ~0U)) /* no valid RTT samples yet? */ + return TCP_INIT_CWND; /* be safe: cap at default initial cwnd*/ + + w = (u64)bw * bbr->min_rtt_us; + + /* Apply a gain to the given value, then remove the BW_SCALE shift. */ + cwnd = (((w * gain) >> BBR_SCALE) + BW_UNIT - 1) / BW_UNIT; + + /* Allow enough full-sized skbs in flight to utilize end systems. */ + cwnd += 3 * bbr->tso_segs_goal; + + /* Reduce delayed ACKs by rounding up cwnd to the next even number. */ + cwnd = (cwnd + 1) & ~1U; + + return cwnd; +} + +/* An optimization in BBR to reduce losses: On the first round of recovery, we + * follow the packet conservation principle: send P packets per P packets acked. + * After that, we slow-start and send at most 2*P packets per P packets acked. + * After recovery finishes, or upon undo, we restore the cwnd we had when + * recovery started (capped by the target cwnd based on estimated BDP). + * + * TODO(ycheng/ncardwell): implement a rate-based approach. + */ +static bool bbr_set_cwnd_to_recover_or_restore( + struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs, u32 acked, u32 *new_cwnd) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u8 prev_state = bbr->prev_ca_state, state = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state; + u32 cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd; + + /* An ACK for P pkts should release at most 2*P packets. We do this + * in two steps. First, here we deduct the number of lost packets. + * Then, in bbr_set_cwnd() we slow start up toward the target cwnd. + */ + if (rs->losses > 0) + cwnd = max_t(s32, cwnd - rs->losses, 1); + + if (state == TCP_CA_Recovery && prev_state != TCP_CA_Recovery) { + /* Starting 1st round of Recovery, so do packet conservation. */ + bbr->packet_conservation = 1; + bbr->next_rtt_delivered = tp->delivered; /* start round now */ + /* Cut unused cwnd from app behavior, TSQ, or TSO deferral: */ + cwnd = tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) + acked; + } else if (prev_state >= TCP_CA_Recovery && state < TCP_CA_Recovery) { + /* Exiting loss recovery; restore cwnd saved before recovery. */ + bbr->restore_cwnd = 1; + bbr->packet_conservation = 0; + } + bbr->prev_ca_state = state; + + if (bbr->restore_cwnd) { + /* Restore cwnd after exiting loss recovery or PROBE_RTT. */ + cwnd = max(cwnd, bbr->prior_cwnd); + bbr->restore_cwnd = 0; + } + + if (bbr->packet_conservation) { + *new_cwnd = max(cwnd, tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) + acked); + return true; /* yes, using packet conservation */ + } + *new_cwnd = cwnd; + return false; +} + +/* Slow-start up toward target cwnd (if bw estimate is growing, or packet loss + * has drawn us down below target), or snap down to target if we're above it. + */ +static void bbr_set_cwnd(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs, + u32 acked, u32 bw, int gain) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 cwnd = 0, target_cwnd = 0; + + if (!acked) + return; + + if (bbr_set_cwnd_to_recover_or_restore(sk, rs, acked, &cwnd)) + goto done; + + /* If we're below target cwnd, slow start cwnd toward target cwnd. */ + target_cwnd = bbr_target_cwnd(sk, bw, gain); + if (bbr_full_bw_reached(sk)) /* only cut cwnd if we filled the pipe */ + cwnd = min(cwnd + acked, target_cwnd); + else if (cwnd < target_cwnd || tp->delivered < TCP_INIT_CWND) + cwnd = cwnd + acked; + cwnd = max(cwnd, bbr_cwnd_min_target); + +done: + tp->snd_cwnd = min(cwnd, tp->snd_cwnd_clamp); /* apply global cap */ + if (bbr->mode == BBR_PROBE_RTT) /* drain queue, refresh min_rtt */ + tp->snd_cwnd = min(tp->snd_cwnd, bbr_cwnd_min_target); +} + +/* End cycle phase if it's time and/or we hit the phase's in-flight target. */ +static bool bbr_is_next_cycle_phase(struct sock *sk, + const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + bool is_full_length = + skb_mstamp_us_delta(&tp->delivered_mstamp, &bbr->cycle_mstamp) > + bbr->min_rtt_us; + u32 inflight, bw; + + /* The pacing_gain of 1.0 paces at the estimated bw to try to fully + * use the pipe without increasing the queue. + */ + if (bbr->pacing_gain == BBR_UNIT) + return is_full_length; /* just use wall clock time */ + + inflight = rs->prior_in_flight; /* what was in-flight before ACK? */ + bw = bbr_max_bw(sk); + + /* A pacing_gain > 1.0 probes for bw by trying to raise inflight to at + * least pacing_gain*BDP; this may take more than min_rtt if min_rtt is + * small (e.g. on a LAN). We do not persist if packets are lost, since + * a path with small buffers may not hold that much. + */ + if (bbr->pacing_gain > BBR_UNIT) + return is_full_length && + (rs->losses || /* perhaps pacing_gain*BDP won't fit */ + inflight >= bbr_target_cwnd(sk, bw, bbr->pacing_gain)); + + /* A pacing_gain < 1.0 tries to drain extra queue we added if bw + * probing didn't find more bw. If inflight falls to match BDP then we + * estimate queue is drained; persisting would underutilize the pipe. + */ + return is_full_length || + inflight <= bbr_target_cwnd(sk, bw, BBR_UNIT); +} + +static void bbr_advance_cycle_phase(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + bbr->cycle_idx = (bbr->cycle_idx + 1) & (CYCLE_LEN - 1); + bbr->cycle_mstamp = tp->delivered_mstamp; + bbr->pacing_gain = bbr_pacing_gain[bbr->cycle_idx]; +} + +/* Gain cycling: cycle pacing gain to converge to fair share of available bw. */ +static void bbr_update_cycle_phase(struct sock *sk, + const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + if ((bbr->mode == BBR_PROBE_BW) && !bbr->lt_use_bw && + bbr_is_next_cycle_phase(sk, rs)) + bbr_advance_cycle_phase(sk); +} + +static void bbr_reset_startup_mode(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + bbr->mode = BBR_STARTUP; + bbr->pacing_gain = bbr_high_gain; + bbr->cwnd_gain = bbr_high_gain; +} + +static void bbr_reset_probe_bw_mode(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + bbr->mode = BBR_PROBE_BW; + bbr->pacing_gain = BBR_UNIT; + bbr->cwnd_gain = bbr_cwnd_gain; + bbr->cycle_idx = CYCLE_LEN - 1 - prandom_u32_max(bbr_cycle_rand); + bbr_advance_cycle_phase(sk); /* flip to next phase of gain cycle */ +} + +static void bbr_reset_mode(struct sock *sk) +{ + if (!bbr_full_bw_reached(sk)) + bbr_reset_startup_mode(sk); + else + bbr_reset_probe_bw_mode(sk); +} + +/* Start a new long-term sampling interval. */ +static void bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling_interval(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + bbr->lt_last_stamp = tp->delivered_mstamp.stamp_jiffies; + bbr->lt_last_delivered = tp->delivered; + bbr->lt_last_lost = tp->lost; + bbr->lt_rtt_cnt = 0; +} + +/* Completely reset long-term bandwidth sampling. */ +static void bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + bbr->lt_bw = 0; + bbr->lt_use_bw = 0; + bbr->lt_is_sampling = false; + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling_interval(sk); +} + +/* Long-term bw sampling interval is done. Estimate whether we're policed. */ +static void bbr_lt_bw_interval_done(struct sock *sk, u32 bw) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 diff; + + if (bbr->lt_bw) { /* do we have bw from a previous interval? */ + /* Is new bw close to the lt_bw from the previous interval? */ + diff = abs(bw - bbr->lt_bw); + if ((diff * BBR_UNIT <= bbr_lt_bw_ratio * bbr->lt_bw) || + (bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(sk, diff, BBR_UNIT) <= + bbr_lt_bw_diff)) { + /* All criteria are met; estimate we're policed. */ + bbr->lt_bw = (bw + bbr->lt_bw) >> 1; /* avg 2 intvls */ + bbr->lt_use_bw = 1; + bbr->pacing_gain = BBR_UNIT; /* try to avoid drops */ + bbr->lt_rtt_cnt = 0; + return; + } + } + bbr->lt_bw = bw; + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling_interval(sk); +} + +/* Token-bucket traffic policers are common (see "An Internet-Wide Analysis of + * Traffic Policing", SIGCOMM 2016). BBR detects token-bucket policers and + * explicitly models their policed rate, to reduce unnecessary losses. We + * estimate that we're policed if we see 2 consecutive sampling intervals with + * consistent throughput and high packet loss. If we think we're being policed, + * set lt_bw to the "long-term" average delivery rate from those 2 intervals. + */ +static void bbr_lt_bw_sampling(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 lost, delivered; + u64 bw; + s32 t; + + if (bbr->lt_use_bw) { /* already using long-term rate, lt_bw? */ + if (bbr->mode == BBR_PROBE_BW && bbr->round_start && + ++bbr->lt_rtt_cnt >= bbr_lt_bw_max_rtts) { + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(sk); /* stop using lt_bw */ + bbr_reset_probe_bw_mode(sk); /* restart gain cycling */ + } + return; + } + + /* Wait for the first loss before sampling, to let the policer exhaust + * its tokens and estimate the steady-state rate allowed by the policer. + * Starting samples earlier includes bursts that over-estimate the bw. + */ + if (!bbr->lt_is_sampling) { + if (!rs->losses) + return; + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling_interval(sk); + bbr->lt_is_sampling = true; + } + + /* To avoid underestimates, reset sampling if we run out of data. */ + if (rs->is_app_limited) { + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(sk); + return; + } + + if (bbr->round_start) + bbr->lt_rtt_cnt++; /* count round trips in this interval */ + if (bbr->lt_rtt_cnt < bbr_lt_intvl_min_rtts) + return; /* sampling interval needs to be longer */ + if (bbr->lt_rtt_cnt > 4 * bbr_lt_intvl_min_rtts) { + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(sk); /* interval is too long */ + return; + } + + /* End sampling interval when a packet is lost, so we estimate the + * policer tokens were exhausted. Stopping the sampling before the + * tokens are exhausted under-estimates the policed rate. + */ + if (!rs->losses) + return; + + /* Calculate packets lost and delivered in sampling interval. */ + lost = tp->lost - bbr->lt_last_lost; + delivered = tp->delivered - bbr->lt_last_delivered; + /* Is loss rate (lost/delivered) >= lt_loss_thresh? If not, wait. */ + if (!delivered || (lost << BBR_SCALE) < bbr_lt_loss_thresh * delivered) + return; + + /* Find average delivery rate in this sampling interval. */ + t = (s32)(tp->delivered_mstamp.stamp_jiffies - bbr->lt_last_stamp); + if (t < 1) + return; /* interval is less than one jiffy, so wait */ + t = jiffies_to_usecs(t); + /* Interval long enough for jiffies_to_usecs() to return a bogus 0? */ + if (t < 1) { + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(sk); /* interval too long; reset */ + return; + } + bw = (u64)delivered * BW_UNIT; + do_div(bw, t); + bbr_lt_bw_interval_done(sk, bw); +} + +/* Estimate the bandwidth based on how fast packets are delivered */ +static void bbr_update_bw(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u64 bw; + + bbr->round_start = 0; + if (rs->delivered < 0 || rs->interval_us <= 0) + return; /* Not a valid observation */ + + /* See if we've reached the next RTT */ + if (!before(rs->prior_delivered, bbr->next_rtt_delivered)) { + bbr->next_rtt_delivered = tp->delivered; + bbr->rtt_cnt++; + bbr->round_start = 1; + bbr->packet_conservation = 0; + } + + bbr_lt_bw_sampling(sk, rs); + + /* Divide delivered by the interval to find a (lower bound) bottleneck + * bandwidth sample. Delivered is in packets and interval_us in uS and + * ratio will be <<1 for most connections. So delivered is first scaled. + */ + bw = (u64)rs->delivered * BW_UNIT; + do_div(bw, rs->interval_us); + + /* If this sample is application-limited, it is likely to have a very + * low delivered count that represents application behavior rather than + * the available network rate. Such a sample could drag down estimated + * bw, causing needless slow-down. Thus, to continue to send at the + * last measured network rate, we filter out app-limited samples unless + * they describe the path bw at least as well as our bw model. + * + * So the goal during app-limited phase is to proceed with the best + * network rate no matter how long. We automatically leave this + * phase when app writes faster than the network can deliver :) + */ + if (!rs->is_app_limited || bw >= bbr_max_bw(sk)) { + /* Incorporate new sample into our max bw filter. */ + minmax_running_max(&bbr->bw, bbr_bw_rtts, bbr->rtt_cnt, bw); + } +} + +/* Estimate when the pipe is full, using the change in delivery rate: BBR + * estimates that STARTUP filled the pipe if the estimated bw hasn't changed by + * at least bbr_full_bw_thresh (25%) after bbr_full_bw_cnt (3) non-app-limited + * rounds. Why 3 rounds: 1: rwin autotuning grows the rwin, 2: we fill the + * higher rwin, 3: we get higher delivery rate samples. Or transient + * cross-traffic or radio noise can go away. CUBIC Hystart shares a similar + * design goal, but uses delay and inter-ACK spacing instead of bandwidth. + */ +static void bbr_check_full_bw_reached(struct sock *sk, + const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 bw_thresh; + + if (bbr_full_bw_reached(sk) || !bbr->round_start || rs->is_app_limited) + return; + + bw_thresh = (u64)bbr->full_bw * bbr_full_bw_thresh >> BBR_SCALE; + if (bbr_max_bw(sk) >= bw_thresh) { + bbr->full_bw = bbr_max_bw(sk); + bbr->full_bw_cnt = 0; + return; + } + ++bbr->full_bw_cnt; +} + +/* If pipe is probably full, drain the queue and then enter steady-state. */ +static void bbr_check_drain(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + if (bbr->mode == BBR_STARTUP && bbr_full_bw_reached(sk)) { + bbr->mode = BBR_DRAIN; /* drain queue we created */ + bbr->pacing_gain = bbr_drain_gain; /* pace slow to drain */ + bbr->cwnd_gain = bbr_high_gain; /* maintain cwnd */ + } /* fall through to check if in-flight is already small: */ + if (bbr->mode == BBR_DRAIN && + tcp_packets_in_flight(tcp_sk(sk)) <= + bbr_target_cwnd(sk, bbr_max_bw(sk), BBR_UNIT)) + bbr_reset_probe_bw_mode(sk); /* we estimate queue is drained */ +} + +/* The goal of PROBE_RTT mode is to have BBR flows cooperatively and + * periodically drain the bottleneck queue, to converge to measure the true + * min_rtt (unloaded propagation delay). This allows the flows to keep queues + * small (reducing queuing delay and packet loss) and achieve fairness among + * BBR flows. + * + * The min_rtt filter window is 10 seconds. When the min_rtt estimate expires, + * we enter PROBE_RTT mode and cap the cwnd at bbr_cwnd_min_target=4 packets. + * After at least bbr_probe_rtt_mode_ms=200ms and at least one packet-timed + * round trip elapsed with that flight size <= 4, we leave PROBE_RTT mode and + * re-enter the previous mode. BBR uses 200ms to approximately bound the + * performance penalty of PROBE_RTT's cwnd capping to roughly 2% (200ms/10s). + * + * Note that flows need only pay 2% if they are busy sending over the last 10 + * seconds. Interactive applications (e.g., Web, RPCs, video chunks) often have + * natural silences or low-rate periods within 10 seconds where the rate is low + * enough for long enough to drain its queue in the bottleneck. We pick up + * these min RTT measurements opportunistically with our min_rtt filter. :-) + */ +static void bbr_update_min_rtt(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + bool filter_expired; + + /* Track min RTT seen in the min_rtt_win_sec filter window: */ + filter_expired = after(tcp_time_stamp, + bbr->min_rtt_stamp + bbr_min_rtt_win_sec * HZ); + if (rs->rtt_us >= 0 && + (rs->rtt_us <= bbr->min_rtt_us || filter_expired)) { + bbr->min_rtt_us = rs->rtt_us; + bbr->min_rtt_stamp = tcp_time_stamp; + } + + if (bbr_probe_rtt_mode_ms > 0 && filter_expired && + !bbr->idle_restart && bbr->mode != BBR_PROBE_RTT) { + bbr->mode = BBR_PROBE_RTT; /* dip, drain queue */ + bbr->pacing_gain = BBR_UNIT; + bbr->cwnd_gain = BBR_UNIT; + bbr_save_cwnd(sk); /* note cwnd so we can restore it */ + bbr->probe_rtt_done_stamp = 0; + } + + if (bbr->mode == BBR_PROBE_RTT) { + /* Ignore low rate samples during this mode. */ + tp->app_limited = + (tp->delivered + tcp_packets_in_flight(tp)) ? : 1; + /* Maintain min packets in flight for max(200 ms, 1 round). */ + if (!bbr->probe_rtt_done_stamp && + tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) <= bbr_cwnd_min_target) { + bbr->probe_rtt_done_stamp = tcp_time_stamp + + msecs_to_jiffies(bbr_probe_rtt_mode_ms); + bbr->probe_rtt_round_done = 0; + bbr->next_rtt_delivered = tp->delivered; + } else if (bbr->probe_rtt_done_stamp) { + if (bbr->round_start) + bbr->probe_rtt_round_done = 1; + if (bbr->probe_rtt_round_done && + after(tcp_time_stamp, bbr->probe_rtt_done_stamp)) { + bbr->min_rtt_stamp = tcp_time_stamp; + bbr->restore_cwnd = 1; /* snap to prior_cwnd */ + bbr_reset_mode(sk); + } + } + } + bbr->idle_restart = 0; +} + +static void bbr_update_model(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + bbr_update_bw(sk, rs); + bbr_update_cycle_phase(sk, rs); + bbr_check_full_bw_reached(sk, rs); + bbr_check_drain(sk, rs); + bbr_update_min_rtt(sk, rs); +} + +static void bbr_main(struct sock *sk, const struct rate_sample *rs) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u32 bw; + + bbr_update_model(sk, rs); + + bw = bbr_bw(sk); + bbr_set_pacing_rate(sk, bw, bbr->pacing_gain); + bbr_set_tso_segs_goal(sk); + bbr_set_cwnd(sk, rs, rs->acked_sacked, bw, bbr->cwnd_gain); +} + +static void bbr_init(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u64 bw; + + bbr->prior_cwnd = 0; + bbr->tso_segs_goal = 0; /* default segs per skb until first ACK */ + bbr->rtt_cnt = 0; + bbr->next_rtt_delivered = 0; + bbr->prev_ca_state = TCP_CA_Open; + bbr->packet_conservation = 0; + + bbr->probe_rtt_done_stamp = 0; + bbr->probe_rtt_round_done = 0; + bbr->min_rtt_us = tcp_min_rtt(tp); + bbr->min_rtt_stamp = tcp_time_stamp; + + minmax_reset(&bbr->bw, bbr->rtt_cnt, 0); /* init max bw to 0 */ + + /* Initialize pacing rate to: high_gain * init_cwnd / RTT. */ + bw = (u64)tp->snd_cwnd * BW_UNIT; + do_div(bw, (tp->srtt_us >> 3) ? : USEC_PER_MSEC); + sk->sk_pacing_rate = 0; /* force an update of sk_pacing_rate */ + bbr_set_pacing_rate(sk, bw, bbr_high_gain); + + bbr->restore_cwnd = 0; + bbr->round_start = 0; + bbr->idle_restart = 0; + bbr->full_bw = 0; + bbr->full_bw_cnt = 0; + bbr->cycle_mstamp.v64 = 0; + bbr->cycle_idx = 0; + bbr_reset_lt_bw_sampling(sk); + bbr_reset_startup_mode(sk); +} + +static u32 bbr_sndbuf_expand(struct sock *sk) +{ + /* Provision 3 * cwnd since BBR may slow-start even during recovery. */ + return 3; +} + +/* In theory BBR does not need to undo the cwnd since it does not + * always reduce cwnd on losses (see bbr_main()). Keep it for now. + */ +static u32 bbr_undo_cwnd(struct sock *sk) +{ + return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_cwnd; +} + +/* Entering loss recovery, so save cwnd for when we exit or undo recovery. */ +static u32 bbr_ssthresh(struct sock *sk) +{ + bbr_save_cwnd(sk); + return TCP_INFINITE_SSTHRESH; /* BBR does not use ssthresh */ +} + +static size_t bbr_get_info(struct sock *sk, u32 ext, int *attr, + union tcp_cc_info *info) +{ + if (ext & (1 << (INET_DIAG_BBRINFO - 1)) || + ext & (1 << (INET_DIAG_VEGASINFO - 1))) { + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + u64 bw = bbr_bw(sk); + + bw = bw * tp->mss_cache * USEC_PER_SEC >> BW_SCALE; + memset(&info->bbr, 0, sizeof(info->bbr)); + info->bbr.bbr_bw_lo = (u32)bw; + info->bbr.bbr_bw_hi = (u32)(bw >> 32); + info->bbr.bbr_min_rtt = bbr->min_rtt_us; + info->bbr.bbr_pacing_gain = bbr->pacing_gain; + info->bbr.bbr_cwnd_gain = bbr->cwnd_gain; + *attr = INET_DIAG_BBRINFO; + return sizeof(info->bbr); + } + return 0; +} + +static void bbr_set_state(struct sock *sk, u8 new_state) +{ + struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk); + + if (new_state == TCP_CA_Loss) { + struct rate_sample rs = { .losses = 1 }; + + bbr->prev_ca_state = TCP_CA_Loss; + bbr->full_bw = 0; + bbr->round_start = 1; /* treat RTO like end of a round */ + bbr_lt_bw_sampling(sk, &rs); + } +} + +static struct tcp_congestion_ops tcp_bbr_cong_ops __read_mostly = { + .flags = TCP_CONG_NON_RESTRICTED, + .name = "bbr", + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .init = bbr_init, + .cong_control = bbr_main, + .sndbuf_expand = bbr_sndbuf_expand, + .undo_cwnd = bbr_undo_cwnd, + .cwnd_event = bbr_cwnd_event, + .ssthresh = bbr_ssthresh, + .tso_segs_goal = bbr_tso_segs_goal, + .get_info = bbr_get_info, + .set_state = bbr_set_state, +}; + +static int __init bbr_register(void) +{ + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bbr) > ICSK_CA_PRIV_SIZE); + return tcp_register_congestion_control(&tcp_bbr_cong_ops); +} + +static void __exit bbr_unregister(void) +{ + tcp_unregister_congestion_control(&tcp_bbr_cong_ops); +} + +module_init(bbr_register); +module_exit(bbr_unregister); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Van Jacobson <vanj@google.com>"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>"); +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TCP BBR (Bottleneck Bandwidth and RTT)"); |