ALSA: pcm: use goto statement instead of while statement to reduce indentation

In a process to calculate parameters of PCM substream, application of all
rules is iterated several times till parameter dependencies are satisfied.
In current implementation, two loops are used for the design, however this
brings two-level indentation and decline readability.

This commit attempts to reduce the indentation by using goto statement,
instead of outer while loop.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

1 files changed, 44 insertions, 42 deletions

diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
index 000e6e9a0c2b..41aeb6facdec 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
@@ -337,54 +337,56 @@ static int constrain_params_by_rules(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 		rstamps[k] = 0;
 	for (k = 0; k <= SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_LAST_INTERVAL; k++)
 		vstamps[k] = (params->rmask & (1 << k)) ? 1 : 0;
-	do {
-		again = 0;
-		for (k = 0; k < constrs->rules_num; k++) {
-			struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *r = &constrs->rules[k];
-			unsigned int d;
-			int doit = 0;
-			if (r->cond && !(r->cond & params->flags))
-				continue;
-			for (d = 0; r->deps[d] >= 0; d++) {
-				if (vstamps[r->deps[d]] > rstamps[k]) {
-					doit = 1;
-					break;
-				}
+retry:
+	again = 0;
+	for (k = 0; k < constrs->rules_num; k++) {
+		struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *r = &constrs->rules[k];
+		unsigned int d;
+		int doit = 0;
+		if (r->cond && !(r->cond & params->flags))
+			continue;
+		for (d = 0; r->deps[d] >= 0; d++) {
+			if (vstamps[r->deps[d]] > rstamps[k]) {
+				doit = 1;
+				break;
 			}
-			if (!doit)
-				continue;
+		}
+		if (!doit)
+			continue;
 
-			if (trace_hw_mask_param_enabled()) {
-				if (hw_is_mask(r->var))
-					old_mask = *hw_param_mask(params, r->var);
-			}
-			if (trace_hw_interval_param_enabled()) {
-				if (hw_is_interval(r->var))
-					old_interval = *hw_param_interval(params, r->var);
-			}
+		if (trace_hw_mask_param_enabled()) {
+			if (hw_is_mask(r->var))
+				old_mask = *hw_param_mask(params, r->var);
+		}
+		if (trace_hw_interval_param_enabled()) {
+			if (hw_is_interval(r->var))
+				old_interval = *hw_param_interval(params, r->var);
+		}
 
-			changed = r->func(params, r);
+		changed = r->func(params, r);
 
-			if (hw_is_mask(r->var)) {
-				trace_hw_mask_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
-					&old_mask, hw_param_mask(params, r->var));
-			}
-			if (hw_is_interval(r->var)) {
-				trace_hw_interval_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
-					&old_interval, hw_param_interval(params, r->var));
-			}
+		if (hw_is_mask(r->var)) {
+			trace_hw_mask_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
+				&old_mask, hw_param_mask(params, r->var));
+		}
+		if (hw_is_interval(r->var)) {
+			trace_hw_interval_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
+				&old_interval, hw_param_interval(params, r->var));
+		}
 
-			rstamps[k] = stamp;
-			if (changed && r->var >= 0) {
-				params->cmask |= (1 << r->var);
-				vstamps[r->var] = stamp;
-				again = 1;
-			}
-			if (changed < 0)
-				return changed;
-			stamp++;
+		rstamps[k] = stamp;
+		if (changed && r->var >= 0) {
+			params->cmask |= (1 << r->var);
+			vstamps[r->var] = stamp;
+			again = 1;
 		}
-	} while (again);
+		if (changed < 0)
+			return changed;
+		stamp++;
+	}
+
+	if (again)
+		goto retry;
 
 	return 0;
 }