diff options
| author | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> | 2016-05-19 17:11:34 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -0700 |
| commit | fda3d69be9fe7a24ad32b840cb2ed7c30b6ba1c9 (patch) | |
| tree | 573d6c40ed432dccaad8c8fb77ff5b2781150462 /mm/memcontrol.c | |
| parent | 4ee815be1d34a6f254b3d09bdebcb27f294f2bd3 (diff) | |
mm/memcontrol.c:mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(): clarify comment
> The comment seems to have not much to do with the code?
I guess the comment tries to say that the code path is triggered when we
charge the page which happens _before_ it is added to the LRU list and
so last_scanned_node might contain the stale data.
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 6740c4c2b550..011dac8ab5d7 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1391,10 +1391,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) node = next_node_in(node, memcg->scan_nodes); /* - * We call this when we hit limit, not when pages are added to LRU. - * No LRU may hold pages because all pages are UNEVICTABLE or - * memcg is too small and all pages are not on LRU. In that case, - * we use curret node. + * mem_cgroup_may_update_nodemask might have seen no reclaimmable pages + * last time it really checked all the LRUs due to rate limiting. + * Fallback to the current node in that case for simplicity. */ if (unlikely(node == MAX_NUMNODES)) node = numa_node_id(); |