summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/core.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>2013-06-20 10:18:47 +0800
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2013-06-27 10:07:30 +0200
commita75cdaa915e42ef0e6f38dc7f2a6a1deca91d648 (patch)
treefe4e17990b233e5998b8372ce5be39cb9ff32a68 /kernel/sched/core.c
parentfa6bddeb14d59d701f846b174b59c9982e926e66 (diff)
sched: Set an initial value of runnable avg for new forked task
We need to initialize the se.avg.{decay_count, load_avg_contrib} for a new forked task. Otherwise random values of above variables cause a mess when a new task is enqueued: enqueue_task_fair enqueue_entity enqueue_entity_load_avg and make fork balancing imbalance due to incorrect load_avg_contrib. Further more, Morten Rasmussen notice some tasks were not launched at once after created. So Paul and Peter suggest giving a start value for new task runnable avg time same as sched_slice(). PeterZ said: > So the 'problem' is that our running avg is a 'floating' average; ie. it > decays with time. Now we have to guess about the future of our newly > spawned task -- something that is nigh impossible seeing these CPU > vendors keep refusing to implement the crystal ball instruction. > > So there's two asymptotic cases we want to deal well with; 1) the case > where the newly spawned program will be 'nearly' idle for its lifetime; > and 2) the case where its cpu-bound. > > Since we have to guess, we'll go for worst case and assume its > cpu-bound; now we don't want to make the avg so heavy adjusting to the > near-idle case takes forever. We want to be able to quickly adjust and > lower our running avg. > > Now we also don't want to make our avg too light, such that it gets > decremented just for the new task not having had a chance to run yet -- > even if when it would run, it would be more cpu-bound than not. > > So what we do is we make the initial avg of the same duration as that we > guess it takes to run each task on the system at least once -- aka > sched_slice(). > > Of course we can defeat this with wakeup/fork bombs, but in the 'normal' > case it should be good enough. Paul also contributed most of the code comments in this commit. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> [peterz; added explanation of sched_slice() usage] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1371694737-29336-4-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/core.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/core.c6
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0241b1b55a04..729e7fc7634b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1611,10 +1611,6 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
p->se.vruntime = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period = 0;
- p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum = 0;
-#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
memset(&p->se.statistics, 0, sizeof(p->se.statistics));
#endif
@@ -1758,6 +1754,8 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p)
set_task_cpu(p, select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0));
#endif
+ /* Initialize new task's runnable average */
+ init_task_runnable_average(p);
rq = __task_rq_lock(p);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
p->on_rq = 1;