diff options
author | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> | 2022-03-22 11:57:09 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2022-04-05 10:24:35 +0200 |
commit | ee042be16cb455116d0fe99b77c6bc8baf87c8c6 (patch) | |
tree | d5de58e2f2882f0a433ab90a74d23fbee67aa7be /kernel/locking | |
parent | 16edd9b511a13e7760ed4b92ba4e39bacda5c86f (diff) |
locking: Apply contention tracepoints in the slow path
Adding the lock contention tracepoints in various lock function slow
paths. Note that each arch can define spinlock differently, I only
added it only to the generic qspinlock for now.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322185709.141236-3-namhyung@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mutex.c | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 11 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/semaphore.c | 15 |
8 files changed, 63 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index ee2fd7614a93..c88deda77cf2 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas } set_current_state(state); + trace_contention_begin(lock, 0); for (;;) { bool first; @@ -710,6 +711,7 @@ acquired: skip_wait: /* got the lock - cleanup and rejoice! */ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip); + trace_contention_end(lock, 0); if (ww_ctx) ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); @@ -721,6 +723,7 @@ skip_wait: err: __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); __mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); + trace_contention_end(lock, ret); err_early_kill: raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c index c9fdae94e098..5fe4c5495ba3 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <linux/sched/task.h> #include <linux/sched/debug.h> #include <linux/errno.h> +#include <trace/events/lock.h> int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key) @@ -171,9 +172,11 @@ bool __sched __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool try) if (try) return false; + trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_PERCPU | LCB_F_READ); preempt_enable(); percpu_rwsem_wait(sem, /* .reader = */ true); preempt_disable(); + trace_contention_end(sem, 0); return true; } @@ -216,6 +219,7 @@ void __sched percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) { might_sleep(); rwsem_acquire(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_PERCPU | LCB_F_WRITE); /* Notify readers to take the slow path. */ rcu_sync_enter(&sem->rss); @@ -237,6 +241,7 @@ void __sched percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) /* Wait for all active readers to complete. */ rcuwait_wait_event(&sem->writer, readers_active_check(sem), TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + trace_contention_end(sem, 0); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write); diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c index ec36b73f4733..7f42e52a648f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/hardirq.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <trace/events/lock.h> /** * queued_read_lock_slowpath - acquire read lock of a queue rwlock @@ -34,6 +35,8 @@ void queued_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) } atomic_sub(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts); + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_SPIN | LCB_F_READ); + /* * Put the reader into the wait queue */ @@ -51,6 +54,8 @@ void queued_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) * Signal the next one in queue to become queue head */ arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + trace_contention_end(lock, 0); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_read_lock_slowpath); @@ -62,6 +67,8 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) { int cnts; + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_SPIN | LCB_F_WRITE); + /* Put the writer into the wait queue */ arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -79,5 +86,7 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, &cnts, _QW_LOCKED)); unlock: arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + trace_contention_end(lock, 0); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_write_lock_slowpath); diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c index cbff6ba53d56..65a9a10caa6f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/prefetch.h> #include <asm/byteorder.h> #include <asm/qspinlock.h> +#include <trace/events/lock.h> /* * Include queued spinlock statistics code @@ -401,6 +402,8 @@ pv_queue: idx = node->count++; tail = encode_tail(smp_processor_id(), idx); + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_SPIN); + /* * 4 nodes are allocated based on the assumption that there will * not be nested NMIs taking spinlocks. That may not be true in @@ -554,6 +557,8 @@ locked: pv_kick_node(lock, next); release: + trace_contention_end(lock, 0); + /* * release the node */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 8555c4efe97c..7779ee8abc2a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ #include <linux/sched/wake_q.h> #include <linux/ww_mutex.h> +#include <trace/events/lock.h> + #include "rtmutex_common.h" #ifndef WW_RT @@ -1579,6 +1581,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, set_current_state(state); + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk); if (likely(!ret)) ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter); @@ -1601,6 +1605,9 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. */ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + trace_contention_end(lock, ret); + return ret; } @@ -1683,6 +1690,8 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) /* Save current state and set state to TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT */ current_save_and_set_rtlock_wait_state(); + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); + task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK); for (;;) { @@ -1712,6 +1721,8 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) */ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); + + trace_contention_end(lock, 0); } static __always_inline void __sched rtlock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c index 6fd3162e4098..c201aadb9301 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c @@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, * Reader2 to call up_read(), which might be unbound. */ + trace_contention_begin(rwb, LCB_F_RT | LCB_F_READ); + /* * For rwlocks this returns 0 unconditionally, so the below * !ret conditionals are optimized out. @@ -130,6 +132,8 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock); if (!ret) rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm); + + trace_contention_end(rwb, ret); return ret; } @@ -247,11 +251,13 @@ static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, goto out_unlock; rwbase_set_and_save_current_state(state); + trace_contention_begin(rwb, LCB_F_RT | LCB_F_WRITE); for (;;) { /* Optimized out for rwlocks */ if (rwbase_signal_pending_state(state, current)) { rwbase_restore_current_state(); __rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, 0, flags); + trace_contention_end(rwb, -EINTR); return -EINTR; } @@ -265,6 +271,7 @@ static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, set_current_state(state); } rwbase_restore_current_state(); + trace_contention_end(rwb, 0); out_unlock: raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c index 16b532bb5b92..9d1db4a54d34 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/rwsem.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> +#include <trace/events/lock.h> #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT #include "lock_events.h" @@ -1056,6 +1057,8 @@ queue: if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q)) wake_up_q(&wake_q); + trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_READ); + /* wait to be given the lock */ for (;;) { set_current_state(state); @@ -1077,12 +1080,14 @@ queue: __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock); + trace_contention_end(sem, 0); return sem; out_nolock: rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, &waiter, &wake_q); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fail); + trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR); return ERR_PTR(-EINTR); } @@ -1132,6 +1137,8 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) /* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */ set_current_state(state); + trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_WRITE); + for (;;) { if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, &waiter)) { /* rwsem_try_write_lock() implies ACQUIRE on success */ @@ -1171,6 +1178,7 @@ trylock_again: __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock); + trace_contention_end(sem, 0); return sem; out_nolock: @@ -1178,6 +1186,7 @@ out_nolock: raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, &waiter, &wake_q); lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_fail); + trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR); return ERR_PTR(-EINTR); } diff --git a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c index 9ee381e4d2a4..f2654d2fe43a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c +++ b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <linux/semaphore.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/ftrace.h> +#include <trace/events/lock.h> static noinline void __down(struct semaphore *sem); static noinline int __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem); @@ -205,7 +206,7 @@ struct semaphore_waiter { * constant, and thus optimised away by the compiler. Likewise the * 'timeout' parameter for the cases without timeouts. */ -static inline int __sched __down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, +static inline int __sched ___down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, long timeout) { struct semaphore_waiter waiter; @@ -236,6 +237,18 @@ static inline int __sched __down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, return -EINTR; } +static inline int __sched __down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, + long timeout) +{ + int ret; + + trace_contention_begin(sem, 0); + ret = ___down_common(sem, state, timeout); + trace_contention_end(sem, ret); + + return ret; +} + static noinline void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem) { __down_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); |