summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>2022-12-03 12:49:54 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-12-04 12:59:58 -0800
commitc0c852dd1876dc1db4600ce951a92aadd3073b1c (patch)
tree3125aa4faf137b73126d0ee881bad47a54a46f13 /kernel/bpf
parent1910676cc1ec29fad850448ead0fffdb93fb74b5 (diff)
bpf: Do not mark certain LSM hook arguments as trusted
Martin mentioned that the verifier cannot assume arguments from LSM hook sk_alloc_security being trusted since after the hook is called, the sk ref_count is set to 1. This will overwrite the ref_count changed by the bpf program and may cause ref_count underflow later on. I then further checked some other hooks. For example, for bpf_lsm_file_alloc() hook in fs/file_table.c, f->f_cred = get_cred(cred); error = security_file_alloc(f); if (unlikely(error)) { file_free_rcu(&f->f_rcuhead); return ERR_PTR(error); } atomic_long_set(&f->f_count, 1); The input parameter 'f' to security_file_alloc() cannot be trusted as well. Specifically, I investiaged bpf_map/bpf_prog/file/sk/task alloc/free lsm hooks. Except bpf_map_alloc and task_alloc, arguments for all other hooks should not be considered as trusted. This may not be a complete list, but it covers common usage for sk and task. Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203204954.2043348-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c16
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/btf.c2
2 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index ae0267f150b5..9ea42a45da47 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -345,11 +345,27 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_task_to_inode)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_userns_create)
BTF_SET_END(sleepable_lsm_hooks)
+BTF_SET_START(untrusted_lsm_hooks)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_alloc_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_alloc_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_free_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_sk_free_security)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_task_free)
+BTF_SET_END(untrusted_lsm_hooks)
+
bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id)
{
return btf_id_set_contains(&sleepable_lsm_hooks, btf_id);
}
+bool bpf_lsm_is_trusted(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return !btf_id_set_contains(&untrusted_lsm_hooks, prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
+}
+
const struct bpf_prog_ops lsm_prog_ops = {
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index d11cbf8cece7..c80bd8709e69 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
#include <linux/btf.h>
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
#include <linux/skmsg.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/bsearch.h>
@@ -5829,6 +5830,7 @@ static bool prog_args_trusted(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
return atype == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP || atype == BPF_TRACE_ITER;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
+ return bpf_lsm_is_trusted(prog);
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
return true;
default: