summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/s390
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLongpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>2017-08-08 12:05:32 +0800
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2017-08-08 10:57:43 +0200
commit199b5763d329b43c88f6ad539db8a6c6b42f8edb (patch)
tree224f4ebeb9e58c43ea1916e63e813452f81dd45a /arch/s390
parent1b4d56b86a370a3785a33eba23e2e3009f5a03af (diff)
KVM: add spinlock optimization framework
If a vcpu exits due to request a user mode spinlock, then the spinlock-holder may be preempted in user mode or kernel mode. (Note that not all architectures trap spin loops in user mode, only AMD x86 and ARM/ARM64 currently do). But if a vcpu exits in kernel mode, then the holder must be preempted in kernel mode, so we should choose a vcpu in kernel mode as a more likely candidate for the lock holder. This introduces kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() to decide whether the vcpu is in kernel-mode when it's preempted. kvm_vcpu_on_spin's new argument says the same of the spinning VCPU. Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390')
-rw-r--r--arch/s390/kvm/diag.c2
-rw-r--r--arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c5
2 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
index ce865bd4f81d..6182edebea3d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int __diag_time_slice_end(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 5, "%s", "diag time slice end");
vcpu->stat.diagnose_44++;
- kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+ kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, false);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index af09d3437631..5e07322034b9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2447,6 +2447,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return kvm_s390_vcpu_has_irq(vcpu, 0);
}
+bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
atomic_or(PROG_BLOCK_SIE, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->prog20);