diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-03-07 12:52:36 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-03-07 12:52:36 -0800 |
commit | d72cb8c7d9dbd9ce820c80f3fddb56b296ba96fc (patch) | |
tree | 0a5c1fce60589ead0a9fb719ddbbdf8daef83bca /arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S | |
parent | be37f21a08ce65c7632c7f45e1755a4b07f278a0 (diff) | |
parent | 13fd5de06514458eb320188b7a815d65696efd99 (diff) |
Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.1-mw0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/riscv-linux
Pull RISC-V updates from Palmer Dabbelt:
"This contains the vast majority of the RISC-V patches for this merge
window. It includes:
- A handful of cleanups to our kernel prints, most of which are
things I should have caught the first time.
- We now provide an HWCAP that contains the ISA extensions that all
enabled processors support, as supposed to just looking at the
first enabled processor.
- We no longer spin forever waiting for all harts to boot.
- A fixmap implementation, which is coupled to some cleanups in our
MM code.
The only outstanding patches I know of right now are Vincent Chen's
patches to fix c.ebreak handling in the kernel, the v2 of which was
posted this morning. I'd like those in the MW, but I didn't want to
hold up everything else. The patch set is based on top of my last
fixes submission, but I've tested it with a conflict-free merge from
v5.0. I'm doing this rather than my "just go rebase everything" flow
due to a discussion with Linus, but if I misunderstood then just let
me know and I'll do something else. It's also the first time I've
taken a PR into my own tree, so let me know if I screwed that one up.
I've used my standard testing flow (QEMU in Fedora), but now that
we're starting to get the kernel in better shape I think it's time to
impose some more testing here -- specifically I'm going to require
that patches boot on the HiFive Unleashed because we're getting to the
point where we can actually expect that to work. I haven't done that
for this tag, but I'm going to do it for future ones.
I know the board is a bit expensive and not everyone has one, but if
I've sent you a free one and your patches break the boot then I'm
going to yell at you :). If you don't have one then please indicate
how you tested in your cover letter, and if you have a board then
please add your Tested-by to patches if they work for your testing
flow"
* tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.1-mw0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/riscv-linux:
arch: riscv: fix logic error in parse_dtb
RISC-V: Assign hwcap as per comman capabilities.
RISC-V: Compare cpuid with NR_CPUS before mapping.
RISC-V: Allow hartid-to-cpuid function to fail.
RISC-V: Remove NR_CPUs check during hartid search from DT
RISC-V: Move cpuid to hartid mapping to SMP.
RISC-V: Do not wait indefinitely in __cpu_up
RISC-V: Free-up initrd in free_initrd_mem()
RISC-V: Implement compile-time fixed mappings
RISC-V: Move setup_vm() to mm/init.c
RISC-V: Move setup_bootmem() to mm/init.c
RISC-V: Setup init_mm before parse_early_param()
riscv: remove the HAVE_KPROBES option
riscv: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator
riscv: treat cpu devicetree nodes without status as enabled
riscv: fix riscv_of_processor_hartid() comment
riscv: use pr_info and friends
riscv: add missing newlines to printk messages
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_ppc970.S')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions