summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/x86
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2019-02-20 09:40:40 +0100
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2019-03-06 21:52:15 +0100
commit22dd8365088b6403630b82423cf906491859b65e (patch)
tree117ad21ac265302596d4a11c35625312f2c25c0a /Documentation/x86
parent8a4b06d391b0a42a373808979b5028f5c84d9c6a (diff)
x86/speculation/mds: Add mitigation mode VMWERV
In virtualized environments it can happen that the host has the microcode update which utilizes the VERW instruction to clear CPU buffers, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to expose the X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests. Introduce an internal mitigation mode VMWERV which enables the invocation of the CPU buffer clearing even if X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR is not set. If the system has no updated microcode this results in a pointless execution of the VERW instruction wasting a few CPU cycles. If the microcode is updated, but not exposed to a guest then the CPU buffers will be cleared. That said: Virtual Machines Will Eventually Receive Vaccine Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/x86')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/x86/mds.rst27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mds.rst b/Documentation/x86/mds.rst
index 87ce8ac9f36e..3d6f943f1afb 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/mds.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/mds.rst
@@ -93,11 +93,38 @@ The kernel provides a function to invoke the buffer clearing:
The mitigation is invoked on kernel/userspace, hypervisor/guest and C-state
(idle) transitions.
+As a special quirk to address virtualization scenarios where the host has
+the microcode updated, but the hypervisor does not (yet) expose the
+MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests, the kernel issues the VERW instruction in the
+hope that it might actually clear the buffers. The state is reflected
+accordingly.
+
According to current knowledge additional mitigations inside the kernel
itself are not required because the necessary gadgets to expose the leaked
data cannot be controlled in a way which allows exploitation from malicious
user space or VM guests.
+Kernel internal mitigation modes
+--------------------------------
+
+ ======= ============================================================
+ off Mitigation is disabled. Either the CPU is not affected or
+ mds=off is supplied on the kernel command line
+
+ full Mitigation is eanbled. CPU is affected and MD_CLEAR is
+ advertised in CPUID.
+
+ vmwerv Mitigation is enabled. CPU is affected and MD_CLEAR is not
+ advertised in CPUID. That is mainly for virtualization
+ scenarios where the host has the updated microcode but the
+ hypervisor does not expose MD_CLEAR in CPUID. It's a best
+ effort approach without guarantee.
+ ======= ============================================================
+
+If the CPU is affected and mds=off is not supplied on the kernel command
+line then the kernel selects the appropriate mitigation mode depending on
+the availability of the MD_CLEAR CPUID bit.
+
Mitigation points
-----------------