diff options
| author | David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> | 2018-03-06 14:27:58 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> | 2018-03-06 13:33:02 +0000 |
| commit | f07afa0462b76a5b9c4f3a43d5ac24fdb86a90c2 (patch) | |
| tree | 6cae764e4102fa96ce68876229c6bd8d21bc8d0e /.get_maintainer.ignore | |
| parent | 09a0fb67536a49af19f2bfc632100e9de91fe526 (diff) | |
KVM: s390: fix memory overwrites when not using SCA entries
Even if we don't have extended SCA support, we can have more than 64 CPUs
if we don't enable any HW features that might use the SCA entries.
Now, this works just fine, but we missed a return, which is why we
would actually store the SCA entries. If we have more than 64 CPUs, this
means writing outside of the basic SCA - bad.
Let's fix this. This allows > 64 CPUs when running nested (under vSIE)
without random crashes.
Fixes: a6940674c384 ("KVM: s390: allow 255 VCPUs when sca entries aren't used")
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180306132758.21034-1-david@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to '.get_maintainer.ignore')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions