summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/build_bug.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-11-09bug: introduce ASSERT_STRUCT_OFFSETMaxim Levitsky1-0/+9
ASSERT_STRUCT_OFFSET allows to assert during the build of the kernel that a field in a struct have an expected offset. KVM used to have such macro, but there is almost nothing KVM specific in it so move it to build_bug.h, so that it can be used in other places in KVM. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20221025124741.228045-10-mlevitsk@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-29Revert "kbuild: avoid static_assert for genksyms"Masahiro Yamada1-5/+0
This reverts commit 14dc3983b5dff513a90bd5a8cc90acaf7867c3d0. Macro Elver had sent a fix proper fix earlier, and also pointed out corner cases: "I guess what you propose is simpler, but might still have corner cases where we still get warnings. In particular, if some file (for whatever reason) does not include build_bug.h and uses a raw _Static_assert(), then we still get warnings. E.g. I see 1 user of raw _Static_assert() (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h )." I believe the raw use of _Static_assert() should be allowed, so this should be fixed in genksyms. Even after commit 14dc3983b5df ("kbuild: avoid static_assert for genksyms"), I confirmed the following test code emits the warning. ---------------->8---------------- #include <linux/export.h> _Static_assert((1 ?: 0), ""); void foo(void) { } EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); ---------------->8---------------- WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "foo" [vmlinux] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned. Now that commit 869b91992bce ("genksyms: Ignore module scoped _Static_assert()") fixed this issue properly, the workaround should be reverted. Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/10/845 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201219183911.181442-1-masahiroy@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-11kbuild: avoid static_assert for genksymsArnd Bergmann1-0/+5
genksyms does not know or care about the _Static_assert() built-in, and sometimes falls back to ignoring the later symbols, which causes undefined behavior such as WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "ethtool_set_ethtool_phy_ops" [vmlinux] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned. ld: net/ethtool/common.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against `__crc_ethtool_set_ethtool_phy_ops' can not be used when making a shared object net/ethtool/common.o:(_ftrace_annotated_branch+0x0): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation Redefine static_assert for genksyms to avoid that. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203230955.1482058-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-04linux/build_bug.h: change type to intRikard Falkeborn1-2/+2
Having BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO produce a value of type size_t leads to awkward casts in cases where the result needs to be signed, or of smaller type than size_t. To avoid this, cast the value to int instead and rely on implicit type conversions when a larger or unsigned type is needed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190811184938.1796-3-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-07build_bug.h: add wrapper for _Static_assertRasmus Villemoes1-0/+19
BUILD_BUG_ON() is a little annoying, since it cannot be used outside function scope. So one cannot put assertions about the sizeof() a struct next to the struct definition, but has to hide that in some more or less arbitrary function. Since gcc 4.6 (which is now also the required minimum), there is support for the C11 _Static_assert in all C modes, including gnu89. So add a simple wrapper for that. _Static_assert() requires a message argument, which is usually quite redundant (and I believe that bug got fixed at least in newer C++ standards), but we can easily work around that with a little macro magic, making it optional. For example, adding static_assert(sizeof(struct printf_spec) == 8); in vsprintf.c and modifying that struct to violate it, one gets ./include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "sizeof(struct printf_spec) == 8" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, "" msg "") godbolt.org suggests that _Static_assert() has been support by clang since at least 3.0.0. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190208203015.29702-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Acked-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04build_bug.h: remove most of dummy BUILD_BUG_ON stubs for SparseMasahiro Yamada1-15/+7
The introduction of these dummy BUILD_BUG_ON stubs dates back to commmit 903c0c7cdc21 ("sparse: define dummy BUILD_BUG_ON definition for sparse"). At that time, BUILD_BUG_ON() was implemented with the negative array trick *and* the link-time trick, like this: extern int __build_bug_on_failed; #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \ do { \ ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)])); \ if (condition) __build_bug_on_failed = 1; \ } while(0) Sparse is more strict about the negative array trick than GCC because Sparse requires the array length to be really constant. Here is the simple test code for the macro above: static const int x = 0; BUILD_BUG_ON(x); GCC is absolutely fine with it (-Wvla was enabled only very recently), but Sparse warns like this: error: bad constant expression error: cannot size expression (If you are using a newer version of Sparse, you will see a different warning message, "warning: Variable length array is used".) Anyway, Sparse was producing many false positives, and noisier than it should be at that time. With the previous commit, the leftover negative array trick is gone. Sparse is fine with the current BUILD_BUG_ON(), which is implemented by using the 'error' attribute. I am keeping the stub for BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(). Otherwise, Sparse would complain about the following code, which GCC is fine with: static const int x = 0; int y = BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(x); Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542856462-18836-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04build_bug.h: remove negative-array fallback for BUILD_BUG_ON()Masahiro Yamada1-14/+0
The kernel can only be compiled with an optimization option (-O2, -Os, or the currently proposed -Og). Hence, __OPTIMIZE__ is always defined in the kernel source. The fallback for the -O0 case is just hypothetical and pointless. Moreover, commit 0bb95f80a38f ("Makefile: Globally enable VLA warning") enabled -Wvla warning. The use of variable length arrays is banned. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542856462-18836-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06build_bug.h: remove BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL()Masahiro Yamada1-2/+0
This macro is only used by net/ipv6/mcast.c, but there is no reason why it must be BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(). Replace it with BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(), and remove BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL() definition from <linux/build_bug.h>. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1515121833-3174-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman1-0/+1
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-07-10bug: split BUILD_BUG stuff out into <linux/build_bug.h>Ian Abbott1-0/+84
Including <linux/bug.h> pulls in a lot of bloat from <asm/bug.h> and <asm-generic/bug.h> that is not needed to call the BUILD_BUG() family of macros. Split them out into their own header, <linux/build_bug.h>. Also correct some checkpatch.pl errors for the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() and BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL() macros by adding parentheses around the bitfield widths that begin with a minus sign. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525120316.24473-6-abbotti@mev.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>