| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error
BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524)
<snip>
item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33
item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33
item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33
item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33
item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33
As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of
523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our
dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the
node regardless of their actual key value.
This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap
in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted,
so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need
to be inserted and what exists on disk.
However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any
number of dir indexes in the tree already.
Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip
batching if there's a gap in the key space.
This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch
against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and
then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify
everything was ok.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode,
create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space
for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and
then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the
subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item
is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen
(in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we
have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N
index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are
holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit.
This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is
added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it
started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not
result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation
is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the
delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf
size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf
(the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on
metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner.
The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many
files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default
kernel config) with 12 cores:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/nvme0n1
MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd"
FILES=100000
THREADS=$(nproc --all)
echo "performance" | \
tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT
OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k"
for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do
OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i"
done
fs_mark $OPTS
umount $MNT
Before:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891
4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106
4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653
8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548
8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717
8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985
12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422
12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496
16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964
16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468
After:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375
4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072
4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337
6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703
6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555
8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177
12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819
12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689
16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248
16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933
The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other
patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following
changes:
btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename
btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode
btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe
btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items
btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items
btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items
btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it
btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item
btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently we set the type of a delayed item only after successfully
inserting it into its respective rbtree. This is fine, as the type
is not used anywhere before that point, but for the next patch in the
series, there will be the need to check the type of a delayed item
before inserting it into a rbtree.
So set the type of a delayed item immediately after allocating it.
This also makes the trivial wrappers for adding insertion and deletion
useless, so it removes them as well.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(), we don't expect the metadata
reservation for the delayed dir index item insertion to fail, because the
caller is supposed to have reserved 1 unit of metadata space for that.
All callers are able to deal with an error in case that happens, so there
is no need for something so drastic as a BUG_ON() in case of failure.
Instead just emit a warning, so that's easily noticed during development
(fstests in particular), and return the error to the caller.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently we group delayed dir index items for insertion as a single batch
(a single btree operation) as long as their keys are sequential in the key
space.
For example we have delayed index items for the following index keys:
10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21
We end up building three batches:
1) First one for index keys 10, 11 and 12;
2) Second one for index keys 15 and 16;
3) Third one for index keys 20 and 21.
However, since the dir index numbers come from a monotonically increasing
counter and are never reused, we could group all these items into a single
batch. The existence of holes in the sequence happens only when we had
delayed dir index items for insertion that got deleted before they were
flushed to the subvolume's tree.
The delayed items are stored in a rbtree based on their key order, so
we can just group items into a batch as long as they all fit in a leaf,
and ignore if there's a gap (key offset, index number) between two
consecutive items. This is more efficient and reduces the amount of
time spent when running delayed items if there are gaps between dir
index items.
For example running the following test script:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdj
MNT=/mnt/sdj
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
NUM_FILES=100
mkdir $MNT/testdir
for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do
echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i
done
# Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys.
for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do
rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i
done
start=$(date +%s%N)
sync
end=$(date +%s%N)
dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 ))
echo -e "\nsync took $dur milliseconds"
umount $MNT
While having the following bpftrace script running in another shell:
$ cat bpf-delayed-items-inserts.sh
#!/usr/bin/bpftrace
/* Must add 'noinline' to btrfs_insert_delayed_items(). */
k:btrfs_insert_delayed_items
{
@start_insert_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs;
}
k:btrfs_insert_empty_items
/@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]/
{
@insert_batches = count();
}
kr:btrfs_insert_delayed_items
/@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]/
{
$dur = (nsecs - @start_insert_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000;
@btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur);
delete(@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]);
}
Before this change:
@btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time: 576
@insert_batches: 51
After this change:
@btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time: 174
@insert_batches: 2
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
All delayed items are for dir index items, we don't support any other item
types at the moment. So simplify __btrfs_add_delayed_item() and add an
assertion for checking the item's key type. This also allows the next
change to be simpler and avoid to check key types. In case we add support
for different item types in the future, then we'll hit the assertion
during development and be able to adjust any code that is assuming delayed
items are always associated to dir index items.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch
(single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as
long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have
a leaf that has dir index items with offsets:
2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10
And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and
no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up
deleting in 3 batches:
1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4;
2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7;
3) Third batch for index 10.
This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single
batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches
each consecutive dir index key in a leaf.
So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a
key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf.
Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the
first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's
silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for
the btree search that gave us the path we have.
This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as
well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree.
For example, the following test script:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdj
MNT=/mnt/sdj
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
NUM_FILES=1000
mkdir $MNT/testdir
for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do
echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i
done
# Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys.
for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do
rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i
done
# Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree.
sync
start=$(date +%s%N)
rm -fr $MNT/testdir
end=$(date +%s%N)
dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 ))
echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds"
umount $MNT
Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script
running in another shell:
$ cat bpf-measure.sh
#!/usr/bin/bpftrace
/* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */
k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items
{
@start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs;
}
k:btrfs_del_items
/@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/
{
@delete_batches = count();
}
kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items
/@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/
{
$dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000;
@btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur);
delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]);
}
Before this change:
@btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563
@delete_batches: 1001
After this change:
@btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328
@delete_batches: 509
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The delayed item deletion entry point, btrfs_delete_delayed_items(), is a
bit convoluted for a few reasons:
1) It's really a loop disguised with labels and goto statements;
2) There's a 'delete_fail' label which isn't only for error cases, we can
jump to that label even if no error happened, if we simply don't have
more delayed items to delete;
3) Unnecessarily keeps track of the current and previous items for no
good reason, as after getting the next item and releasing the current
one, it just jumps to the 'again' label just to look again for the
first delayed item;
4) When a delayed item is not in the tree (because it was already deleted
before), it releases the item while holding a path locked, which is
not necessary and adds more contention to the tree, specially taking
into account that the path came from a deletion search, meaning we have
write locks for nodes at levels 2, 1 and 0. And releasing the item is
not computationally trivial (rb tree deletion, a kfree() and some
trivial things).
So refactor it to use a while loop and add some comments to make it more
obvious why we can have delayed items without a matching item in the tree
as well as why not keep the delayed node locked all the time when running
all its deletion items. This is also a preparation for some upcoming work
involving delayed items.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently, btrfs_delete_delayed_items() ignores any errors returned from
btrfs_batch_delete_items(). This looks fishy but it's not a problem at
the moment because:
1) Two of the errors returned from btrfs_batch_delete_items() are for
impossible cases, cases where a delayed item does not match any item
in the leaf the path points to - btrfs_delete_delayed_items() always
calls btrfs_batch_delete_items() with a path that points to a leaf
that contains an item matching a delayed item;
2) btrfs_batch_delete_items() may return an error from btrfs_del_items(),
in which case it does not release the delayed items of the batch.
At the moment this is harmless because btrfs_del_items() actually is
always able to delete items, even if it returns an error - when it
returns an error it's because it ended up with a leaf mostly empty
(less than 1/3 full) and failed to migrate items from that leaf into
its neighbour leaves - this is not critical, as all the items were
deleted, we just left the tree a bit unbalanced, but it's still a
valid tree and causes no harm, and future operations on the tree will
eventually balance it.
So even if we get an error from btrfs_del_items(), the delayed items
will not be released but the next time we run delayed items we will
find out, at btrfs_delete_delayed_items(), that they are not present
in the tree anymore and then release them.
This is all a bit subtle, and it's certainly prone to be a disaster in
case btrfs_del_items() changes one day and may return errors before being
able to delete all the requested items, in which case we could leave the
filesystem in an inconsistent state as we would commit a transaction
despite a failure from deleting items from the tree.
So make btrfs_delete_delayed_items() check for any errors from the call
to btrfs_batch_delete_items().
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are a few impossible cases that btrfs_batch_delete_items() tries to
deal with:
1) Getting a path pointing to a NULL leaf;
2) The leaf slot is pointing beyond the last item in the leaf;
3) We can't find a single item to delete.
The first case is impossible because the given path was returned by a
successful call to btrfs_search_slot(). Replace the BUG_ON() with an
ASSERT for this.
The second case is impossible because we are always called when a delayed
item matches an item in the given leaf. So add an ASSERT() for that and
if that condition is not satisfied, trigger a warning and return an error.
The third case is impossible exactly because of the same reason as the
second case. The given delayed item matches one item in the leaf, so we
know that our batch always has at least one item. Add an ASSERT to check
that, trigger a warning if that expectation fails and return an error.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 253bf57555e451dec5a7f09dc95d380ce8b10e5b.
Revert the xarray conversion, there's a problem with potential
sleep-inside-spinlock [1] when calling xa_insert that triggers GFP_NOFS
allocation. The radix tree used the preloading mechanism to avoid
sleeping but this is not available in xarray.
Conversion from spin lock to mutex is possible but at time of rc6 is
riskier than a clean revert.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
… in the btrfs_root struct and adjust all usages of this object to use
the XArray API, because it is notionally easier to use and understand,
as it provides array semantics, and also takes care of locking for us,
further simplifying the code.
Also use the opportunity to do some light refactoring.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have a few helpers in inode-item.c, and I'm going to make a few
changes to how we do truncate in the future, so break out these
definitions into their own header file to trim down ctree.h some and
make it easier to do the work on truncate in the future.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the
fs_info. Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and
change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the
same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then
manipulate the block_rsv that is being used.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the
data sizes array 3 times:
1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the
array with the data sizes for each item;
2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data
sizes array and compute the total data size;
3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly
the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the
total data size.
That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of
elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when
doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging
a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single
batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12
characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account
that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we
can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds
up quickly.
It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since
we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes
of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access
the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary.
So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and
btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and
instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the
array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and
compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal
locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain
all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes
array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument
for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert().
This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following
patches:
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch
btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert()
btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories
This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are
included in the changelog of patch 3/3.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently, inode flags are fully backwards incompatible in btrfs. If we
introduce a new inode flag, then tree-checker will detect it and fail.
This can even cause us to fail to mount entirely. To make it possible to
introduce new flags which can be read-only compatible, like VERITY, we
add new ro flags to btrfs without treating them quite so harshly in
tree-checker. A read-only file system can survive an unexpected flag,
and can be mounted.
As for the implementation, it unfortunately gets a little complicated.
The on-disk representation of the inode, btrfs_inode_item, has an __le64
for flags but the in-memory representation, btrfs_inode, uses a u32.
David Sterba had the nice idea that we could reclaim those wasted 32 bits
on disk and use them for the new ro_compat flags.
It turns out that the tree-checker code which checks for unknown flags
is broken, and ignores the upper 32 bits we are hoping to use. The issue
is that the flags use the literal 1 rather than 1ULL, so the flags are
signed ints, and one of them is specifically (1 << 31). As a result, the
mask which ORs the flags is a negative integer on machines where int is
32 bit twos complement. When tree-checker evaluates the expression:
btrfs_inode_flags(leaf, iitem) & ~BTRFS_INODE_FLAG_MASK)
The mask is something like 0x80000abc, which gets promoted to u64 with
sign extension to 0xffffffff80000abc. Negating that 64 bit mask leaves
all the upper bits zeroed, and we can't detect unexpected flags.
This suggests that we can't use those bits after all. Luckily, we have
good reason to believe that they are zero anyway. Inode flags are
metadata, which is always checksummed, so any bit flips that would
introduce 1s would cause a checksum failure anyway (excluding the
improbable case of the checksum getting corrupted exactly badly).
Further, unless the 1 << 31 flag is used, the cast to u64 of the 32 bit
inode flag should preserve its value and not add leading zeroes
(at least for twos complement). The only place that flag
(BTRFS_INODE_ROOT_ITEM_INIT) is used is in a special inode embedded in
the root item, and indeed for that inode we see 0xffffffff80000000 as
the flags on disk. However, that inode is never seen by tree checker,
nor is it used in a context where verity might be meaningful.
Theoretically, a future ro flag might cause trouble on that inode, so we
should proactively clean up that mess before it does.
With the introduction of the new ro flags, keep two separate unsigned
masks and check them against the appropriate u32. Since we no longer run
afoul of sign extension, this also stops writing out 0xffffffff80000000
in root_item inodes going forward.
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In commit 351cbf6e4410e7 ("btrfs: use nofs allocations for running delayed
items") we wrapped all btree updates when running delayed items with
memalloc_nofs_save() and memalloc_nofs_restore(), due to a lock inversion
detected by lockdep involving reclaim and the mutex of delayed nodes.
The problem is because the ref verify tool does some memory allocations
with GFP_KERNEL, which can trigger reclaim and reclaim can trigger inode
eviction, which requires locking the mutex of an inode's delayed node.
On the other hand the ref verify tool is called when allocating metadata
extents as part of operations that modify a btree, which is a problem when
running delayed nodes, where we do btree updates while holding the mutex
of a delayed node. This is what caused the lockdep warning.
Instead of wrapping every btree update when running delayed nodes, change
the ref verify tool to never do GFP_KERNEL allocations, because:
1) We get less repeated code, which at the moment does not even have a
comment mentioning why we need to setup the NOFS context, which is a
recommended good practice as mentioned at
Documentation/core-api/gfp_mask-from-fs-io.rst
2) The ref verify tool is something meant only for debugging and not
something that should be enabled on non-debug / non-development
kernels;
3) We may have yet more places outside delayed-inode.c where we have
similar problem: doing btree updates while holding some lock and
then having the GFP_KERNEL memory allocations, from the ref verify
tool, trigger reclaim and trying again to acquire the same lock
through the reclaim path.
Or we could get more such cases in the future, therefore this change
prevents getting into similar cases when using the ref verify tool.
Curiously most of the memory allocations done by the ref verify tool
were already using GFP_NOFS, except a few ones for no apparent reason.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the
directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we
do the following:
1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the
fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that;
2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(),
keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree
as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the
immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as
they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to;
3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf;
4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and
release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree);
5) Unlock the path.
While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be
improved in a few aspects:
1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the
leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert
them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total
amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding
100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with
very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem
with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839
batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items;
2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree,
while holding a write lock on the leaf;
3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved
metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write
lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items
one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting
them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results
in rebalancing the rbtree.
So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total
item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf
immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata
space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock
on the leaf.
The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/nvme0n1
MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd"
MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single"
FILES=1000000
THREADS=16
FILE_SIZE=0
echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
umount $DEV &> /dev/null
mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV
mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT
OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16"
for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do
OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i"
done
fs_mark $OPTS
umount $MNT
It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and
using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config).
Results before this change:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046
3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528
5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381
6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075
8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634
Results after this change:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824
3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693
5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908
6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241
8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
clang warns:
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:684:6: warning: variable 'total_data_size' set
but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int total_data_size = 0, total_size = 0;
^
1 warning generated.
This variable's value has been unused since commit fc0d82e103c7 ("btrfs:
sink total_data parameter in setup_items_for_insert"). Eliminate it.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1391
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the transaction,
because we could leave an inode with the improper counts or some other
such corruption behind.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we get an error while looking up the inode item we'll simply bail
without cleaning up the delayed node. This results in this style of
warning happening on commit:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 76403 at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1365 btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty+0x5b/0x90
CPU: 0 PID: 76403 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.13.0-rc1+ #373
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty+0x5b/0x90
RSP: 0018:ffffb8bb815a7e50 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff95d6d07e1888 RCX: ffff95d6c0fa3000
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000000000029e91c RDI: ffff95d6c0fc8060
RBP: ffff95d6c0fc8060 R08: 00008d6d701a2c1d R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff95d6d1760ea0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff95d6c15a4d00
R13: ffff95d6c0fa3000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffb8bb815a7e90
FS: 00007f490e8dbb80(0000) GS:ffff95d73bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6e75555cb0 CR3: 00000001101ce001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
Call Trace:
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x43c/0xb00
? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
? vfs_fsync_range+0x90/0x90
iterate_supers+0x8c/0x100
ksys_sync+0x50/0x90
__do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Because the iref isn't dropped and this leaves an elevated node->count,
so any release just re-queues it onto the delayed inodes list. Fix this
by going to the out label to handle the proper cleanup of the delayed
node.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Right now we only cleanup the delayed iref if we have
BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF set on the node. However we have some error
conditions that need to cleanup the iref if it still exists, so to make
this code cleaner move the test_bit into btrfs_release_delayed_iref
itself and unconditionally call it in each of the cases instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
A few places we intermix btrfs_inode_lock with a inode_unlock, and some
places we just use inode_lock/inode_unlock instead of btrfs_inode_lock.
None of these places are using this incorrectly, but as we adjust some
of these callers it would be nice to keep everything consistent, so
convert everybody to use btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_block_rsv_add can return only ENOSPC since it's called with
NO_FLUSH modifier. This so simplify the logic in
btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata to exploit this invariant.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add assert and comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's only used for tracepoint to obtain the inode number, but we already
have the ino from btrfs_delayed_node::inode_id.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from
btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc
while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock
prone. In the past multiple commits:
* ae5e070eaca9 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're
already holding a transaction")
* 6f23277a49e6 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already
hold the handle")
Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a
whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock
scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread
can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying
its atime:
PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test"
#0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d
#1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff
#2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd
#3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held
#4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5
#5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836
#6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2
#7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes.
#8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex
#9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8
#10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED
#11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000
#12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123
#13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a
#14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849
#15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1
#16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb
#17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c
This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to
happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex:
PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30"
#0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d
#1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff
#2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a
#3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up.
#4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex
#5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding
#6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7
#7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1
#8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c
#9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f
#10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01
#11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b
#12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2
#13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb
#14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb
#15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes
#16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c
#17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4
#18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd
#19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d
#20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff
To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any
flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This
patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will
either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the
latter case that return value is going to be propagated to
btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's
fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have
BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly
copying the in-memory state.
Fixes: c53e9653605d ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Following commit f218ea6c4792 ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Remove wrong
qgroup meta reservation calls") this function now reserves num_bytes,
rather than the fixed amount of nodesize. As such this requires the
same amount to be freed in case of failure. Fix this by adjusting
the amount we are freeing.
Fixes: f218ea6c4792 ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Remove wrong qgroup meta reservation calls")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1157:39-41: WARNING !A || A && B is
equivalent to !A || B.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Suggested-by: Jiapeng Zhong <oswb@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Abaci Team <abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a
lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from
blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are
called.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
That parameter can easily be derived based on the "data_size" and "nr"
parameters exploit this fact to simply the function's signature. No
functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The value of this argument can be derived from the total_data as it's
simply the value of the data size + size of btrfs_items being touched.
Move the parameter calculation inside the function. This results in a
simpler interface and also a minor size reduction:
./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.original fs/btrfs/ctree.o
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-34 (-34)
Function old new delta
btrfs_duplicate_item 260 259 -1
setup_items_for_insert 1200 1190 -10
btrfs_insert_empty_items 177 154 -23
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
For delayed inode facility, qgroup metadata is reserved for it, and
later freed.
However we're freeing more bytes than we reserved.
In btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata():
num_bytes = btrfs_calc_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
...
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc(root,
fs_info->nodesize, true);
...
if (!ret) {
node->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
But in btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata():
if (qgroup_free)
btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc(node->root,
node->bytes_reserved);
else
btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta(node->root,
node->bytes_reserved);
This means, we're always releasing more qgroup metadata rsv than we have
reserved.
This won't trigger selftest warning, as btrfs qgroup metadata rsv has
extra protection against cases like quota enabled half-way.
But we still need to fix this problem any way.
This patch will use the same num_bytes for qgroup metadata rsv so we
could handle it correctly.
Fixes: f218ea6c4792 ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Remove wrong qgroup meta reservation calls")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance
patches
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20
kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740
add_block_entry+0x45/0x260
btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0
__btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940
btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0
btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0
btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0
btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390
insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0
btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0
btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0
ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50
do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}:
__lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550
lock_acquire+0x103/0x220
__mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50
btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900
evict+0x19a/0x2c0
dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0
prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0
super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250
do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530
shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410
shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0
balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0
kswapd+0x35a/0x800
kthread+0x1e9/0x210
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/1133:
#0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
#1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410
#2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a
print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a
check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0
? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130
? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90
? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420
__lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550
? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0
? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960
lock_acquire+0x103/0x220
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
__mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50
btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900
? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
evict+0x19a/0x2c0
dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0
prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0
? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310
super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250
do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530
shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410
? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530
? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260
shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0
balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0
? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40
? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
kswapd+0x35a/0x800
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60
? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0
? finish_wait+0x110/0x110
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0
? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0
kthread+0x1e9/0x210
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree
operations. Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently the non-prefixed version is a simple wrapper used to hide
the 4th argument of the prefixed version. This doesn't bring much value
in practice and only makes the code harder to follow by adding another
level of indirection. Rectify this by removing the __ prefix and
have only one public function to release bytes from a block reservation.
No semantic changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The status of aborted transaction can change between calls and it needs
to be accessed by READ_ONCE. Add a helper that also wraps the unlikely
hint.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We want to use this everywhere we modify the file extent items
permanently. These include:
1) Inserting new file extents for writes and prealloc extents.
2) Truncating inode items.
3) btrfs_cont_expand().
4) Insert inline extents.
5) Insert new extents from log replay.
6) Insert a new extent for clone, as it could be past i_size.
7) Hole punching
For hole punching in particular it might seem it's not necessary because
anybody extending would use btrfs_cont_expand, however there is a corner
that still can give us trouble. Start with an empty file and
fallocate KEEP_SIZE 1M-2M
We now have a 0 length file, and a hole file extent from 0-1M, and a
prealloc extent from 1M-2M. Now
punch 1M-1.5M
Because this is past i_size we have
[HOLE EXTENT][ NOTHING ][PREALLOC]
[0 1M][1M 1.5M][1.5M 2M]
with an i_size of 0. Now if we pwrite 0-1.5M we'll increas our i_size
to 1.5M, but our disk_i_size is still 0 until the ordered extent
completes.
However if we now immediately truncate 2M on the file we'll just call
btrfs_cont_expand(inode, 1.5M, 2M), since our old i_size is 1.5M. If we
commit the transaction here and crash we'll expose the gap.
To fix this we need to clear the file extent mapping for the range that
we punched but didn't insert a corresponding file extent for. This will
mean the truncate will only get an disk_i_size set to 1M if we crash
before the finish ordered io happens.
I've written an xfstest to reproduce the problem and validate this fix.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We hit the following warning while running down a different problem
[ 6197.175850] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 6197.185082] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[ 6197.194704] WARNING: CPU: 47 PID: 966 at lib/refcount.c:190 refcount_sub_and_test_checked+0x53/0x60
[ 6197.521792] Call Trace:
[ 6197.526687] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x76/0x1c0
[ 6197.536615] btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes+0xec/0x130
[ 6197.546532] ? __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty+0x60/0x60
[ 6197.556482] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x71/0xd0
[ 6197.566910] cleaner_kthread+0xfa/0x120
[ 6197.574573] kthread+0x111/0x130
[ 6197.581022] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
[ 6197.590086] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 6197.597228] ---[ end trace 424bb7ae00509f56 ]---
This is because the free side drops the ref without the lock, and then
takes the lock if our refcount is 0. So you can have nodes on the tree
that have a refcount of 0. Fix this by zero'ing out that element in our
temporary array so we don't try to kill it again.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function belongs to the family of locking functions, so move it
there. The 'noinline' keyword is dropped as it's now an exported
function that does not need it.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit 9e0af2376434 ("Btrfs: fix task hang under heavy compressed
write") worked around the issue that a recycled work item could get a
false dependency on the original work item due to how the workqueue code
guarantees non-reentrancy. It did so by giving different work functions
to different types of work.
However, the fixes in the previous few patches are more complete, as
they prevent a work item from being recycled at all (except for a tiny
window that the kernel workqueue code handles for us). This obsoletes
the previous fix, so we don't need the unique helpers for correctness.
The only other reason to keep them would be so they show up in stack
traces, but they always seem to be optimized to a tail call, so they
don't show up anyways. So, let's just get rid of the extra indirection.
While we're here, rename normal_work_helper() to the more informative
btrfs_work_helper().
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The file ctree.h serves as a header for everything and has become quite
bloated. Split some helpers that are generic and create a new file that
should be the catch-all for code that's not btrfs-specific.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Historically we reserved worst case for every btree operation, and
generally speaking we want to do that in cases where it could be the
worst case. However for updating inodes we know the inode items are
already in the tree, so it will only be an update operation and never an
insert operation. This allows us to always reserve only the
metadata_size amount for inode updates rather than the
insert_metadata_size amount.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size differs from trans_metadata_size in that
it doesn't take into account any splitting at the levels, because
truncate will never split nodes. However truncate _and_ changing will
never split nodes, so rename btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size to
btrfs_calc_metadata_size. Also btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size is purely
for inserting items, so rename this to btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size.
Making these clearer will help when I start using them differently in
upcoming patches.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is one report of fuzzed image which leads to BUG_ON() in
btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index().
Although that fuzzed image can already be addressed by enhanced
extent-tree error handler, it's still better to hunt down more BUG_ON().
This patch will hunt down two BUG_ON()s in
btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index():
- One for error from btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata()
Instead of BUG_ON(), we output an error message and free the item.
And return the error.
All callers of this function handles the error by aborting current
trasaction.
- One for possible EEXIST from __btrfs_add_delayed_deletion_item()
That function can return -EEXIST.
We already have a good enough error message for that, only need to
clean up the reserved metadata space and allocated item.
To help above cleanup, also modifiy __btrfs_remove_delayed_item() called
in btrfs_release_delayed_item(), to skip unassociated item.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203253
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the
parameters.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Deduplicate the btrfs file type conversion implementation - file systems
that use the same file types as defined by POSIX do not need to define
their own versions and can use the common helper functions decared in
fs_types.h and implemented in fs_types.c
Common implementation can be found via commit:
bbe7449e2599 "fs: common implementation of file type"
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Btrfs's btree locking has two modes, spinning mode and blocking mode,
while searching btree, locking is always acquired in spinning mode and
then converted to blocking mode if necessary, and in some hot paths we may
switch the locking back to spinning mode by btrfs_clear_path_blocking().
When acquiring locks, both of reader and writer need to wait for blocking
readers and writers to complete before doing read_lock()/write_lock().
The problem is that btrfs_clear_path_blocking() needs to switch nodes
in the path to blocking mode at first (by btrfs_set_path_blocking) to
make lockdep happy before doing its actual clearing blocking job.
When switching to blocking mode from spinning mode, it consists of
step 1) bumping up blocking readers counter and
step 2) read_unlock()/write_unlock(),
this has caused serious ping-pong effect if there're a great amount of
concurrent readers/writers, as waiters will be woken up and go to
sleep immediately.
1) Killing this kind of ping-pong results in a big improvement in my 1600k
files creation script,
MNT=/mnt/btrfs
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdf
mount /dev/def $MNT
time fsmark -D 10000 -S0 -n 100000 -s 0 -L 1 -l /tmp/fs_log.txt \
-d $MNT/0 -d $MNT/1 \
-d $MNT/2 -d $MNT/3 \
-d $MNT/4 -d $MNT/5 \
-d $MNT/6 -d $MNT/7 \
-d $MNT/8 -d $MNT/9 \
-d $MNT/10 -d $MNT/11 \
-d $MNT/12 -d $MNT/13 \
-d $MNT/14 -d $MNT/15
w/o patch:
real 2m27.307s
user 0m12.839s
sys 13m42.831s
w/ patch:
real 1m2.273s
user 0m15.802s
sys 8m16.495s
1.1) latency histogram from funclatency[1]
Overall with the patch, there're ~50% less write lock acquisition and
the 95% max latency that write lock takes also reduces to ~100ms from
>500ms.
--------------------------------------------
w/o patch:
--------------------------------------------
Function = btrfs_tree_lock
msecs : count distribution
0 -> 1 : 2385222 |****************************************|
2 -> 3 : 37147 | |
4 -> 7 : 20452 | |
8 -> 15 : 13131 | |
16 -> 31 : 3877 | |
32 -> 63 : 3900 | |
64 -> 127 : 2612 | |
128 -> 255 : 974 | |
256 -> 511 : 165 | |
512 -> 1023 : 13 | |
Function = btrfs_tree_read_lock
msecs : count distribution
0 -> 1 : 6743860 |****************************************|
2 -> 3 : 2146 | |
4 -> 7 : 190 | |
8 -> 15 : 38 | |
16 -> 31 : 4 | |
--------------------------------------------
w/ patch:
--------------------------------------------
Function = btrfs_tree_lock
msecs : count distribution
0 -> 1 : 1318454 |****************************************|
2 -> 3 : 6800 | |
4 -> 7 : 3664 | |
8 -> 15 : 2145 | |
16 -> 31 : 809 | |
32 -> 63 : 219 | |
64 -> 127 : 10 | |
Function = btrfs_tree_read_lock
msecs : count distribution
0 -> 1 : 6854317 |****************************************|
2 -> 3 : 2383 | |
4 -> 7 : 601 | |
8 -> 15 : 92 | |
2) dbench also proves the improvement,
dbench -t 120 -D /mnt/btrfs 16
w/o patch:
Throughput 158.363 MB/sec
w/ patch:
Throughput 449.52 MB/sec
3) xfstests didn't show any additional failures.
One thing to note is that callers may set path->leave_spinning to have
all nodes in the path stay in spinning mode, which means callers are
ready to not sleep before releasing the path, but it won't cause
problems if they don't want to sleep in blocking mode.
[1]: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/blob/master/tools/funclatency.py
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
rb_first_cached() trades an extra pointer "leftmost" for doing the same job as
rb_first() but in O(1).
Functions manipulating delayed_item need to get the first entry, this converts
it to use rb_first_cached().
For more details about the optimization see patch "Btrfs: delayed-refs:
use rb_first_cached for href_root".
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's
objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid.
They are both set to the same value in __setup_root():
static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 objectid)
{
...
root->objectid = objectid;
...
root->root_key.objectid = objecitd;
...
}
and not changed to other value after initialization.
grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places:
$ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l
133
$ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l
55
(4.17, inc. some noise)
It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems
that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case.
Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove
'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
