summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-10-31cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq coreViresh Kumar1-16/+0
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-25cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routineViresh Kumar1-16/+5
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-16cpufreq: loongson2: use cpufreq_generic_init()Viresh Kumar1-2/+1
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. This driver wasn't setting transition_latency and so is getting set to 0 by default. Lets mark it explicitly by calling the generic routine with transition_latency as 0. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: loongson2: don't initialize part of policy set by coreViresh Kumar1-2/+0
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: loongson2: Use generic cpufreq routinesViresh Kumar1-13/+2
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then. This patch uses these generic routines in the loongson2 driver. Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30cpufreq: loongson2: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()Viresh Kumar1-0/+1
Drivers which have an exit path must call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() in their init path. This driver was missing this part and is fixed with this patch. Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30cpufreq: loongson2: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()Viresh Kumar1-4/+1
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-14Merge back earlier 'pm-cpufreq' materialRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+0
2013-08-10cpufreq: Drop the owner field from struct cpufreq_driverViresh Kumar1-1/+0
We don't need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE any more in cpufreq drivers as this field isn't used any more by the cpufreq core. This patch removes it and updates all dependent drivers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-07cpufreq: loongson2: fix regression related to clock managementAaro Koskinen1-5/+6
Commit 42913c799 (MIPS: Loongson2: Use clk API instead of direct dereferences) broke the cpufreq functionality on Loongson2 boards: clk_set_rate() is called before the CPU frequency table is initialized, and therefore will always fail. Fix by moving the clk_set_rate() after the table initialization. Tested on Lemote FuLoong mini-PC. Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-04cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_tableViresh Kumar1-1/+1
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes. Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake. Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its users are updated accordingly. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-22MIPS: Idle: Consolidate all declarations in <asm/idle.h>.Ralf Baechle1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-05-22MIPS: Idle: Re-enable irqs at the end of r3081, au1k and loongson2 cpu_wait.Ralf Baechle1-0/+1
Without this, the WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()); in the idle loop will be triggered. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-04-10cpufreq: mips: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreqViresh Kumar1-0/+248
This patch moves cpufreq driver of MIPS architecture to drivers/cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>