diff options
author | Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com> | 2021-05-27 17:16:18 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2021-06-18 11:36:08 -0600 |
commit | 8943474a416c0d2eac2366c22be1458ad0ceb812 (patch) | |
tree | 658f8702c964a76f8f661c37e0b693aeea258df7 /Documentation/filesystems | |
parent | ef4aa53f36a932e656a3b91cdc8a9a9dcb9cef81 (diff) |
docs: path-lookup: use bare function() rather than literals
As suggested by Matthew Wilcox and Jonathan Corbet, drop ``...``
literals around function names of this patchset.
Signed-off-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527091618.287093-14-foxhlchen@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 70 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst index b746e974393a..a6fa7619b69e 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst @@ -450,13 +450,13 @@ If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem to find a definitive answer. -As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called either +As the last step of walk_component(), step_into() will be called either directly from walk_component() or from handle_dots(). It calls -``handle_mounts()``, to check and handle mount points, in which a new +handle_mounts(), to check and handle mount points, in which a new ``struct path`` is created containing a counted reference to the new dentry and a reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is different from the previous ``vfsmount``. Then if there is -a symbolic link, ``step_into()`` calls ``pick_link()`` to deal with it, +a symbolic link, step_into() calls pick_link() to deal with it, otherwise it installs the new ``struct path`` in the ``struct nameidata``, and drops the unneeded references. @@ -472,8 +472,8 @@ Handling the final component ``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path. It does not call ``walk_component()`` that last time. Handling that final component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are -``path_lookupat()``, ``path_parentat()`` and -``path_openat()`` each of which handles the differing requirements of +path_lookupat(), path_parentat() and +path_openat() each of which handles the differing requirements of different system calls. ``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit @@ -489,17 +489,17 @@ object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``. It essentially just calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to ``lookup_last()``. ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry. It is worth noting that when flag ``LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT`` is set, -``path_lookupat()`` will unset LOOKUP_JUMPED in nameidata so that in the -subsequent path traversal ``d_weak_revalidate()`` won't be called. +path_lookupat() will unset LOOKUP_JUMPED in nameidata so that in the +subsequent path traversal d_weak_revalidate() won't be called. This is important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as one provided by a dead NFS server. Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it -contains, in support functions starting with "``open_last_lookups()``", all the +contains, in support functions starting with "open_last_lookups()", all the complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic links. We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which -focuses on those symbolic links. "``open_last_lookups()``" will sometimes, but +focuses on those symbolic links. "open_last_lookups()" will sometimes, but not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds. Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to @@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and restarts from the top with REF-walk. This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be -clearly seen in functions like ``filename_lookup()``, -``filename_parentat()``, -``do_filp_open()``, and ``do_file_open_root()``. These four +clearly seen in functions like filename_lookup(), +filename_parentat(), +do_filp_open(), and do_file_open_root(). These four correspond roughly to the three ``path_*()`` functions we met earlier, each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``. The ``path_*()`` functions are called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works. @@ -1069,8 +1069,8 @@ all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. A callback ``struct delayed_called`` will be passed to ``->get_link()``: file systems can set their own put_link function and argument through -``set_delayed_call()``. Later on, when VFS wants to put link, it will call -``do_delayed_call()`` to invoke that callback function with the argument. +set_delayed_call(). Later on, when VFS wants to put link, it will call +do_delayed_call() to invoke that callback function with the argument. In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes, whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain, @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ doesn't need to notice. Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is a little more complex. -When a symlink is found, ``walk_component()`` calls ``pick_link()`` via ``step_into()`` +When a symlink is found, walk_component() calls pick_link() via step_into() which returns the link from the filesystem. Providing that operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the stack, and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while. When the end of @@ -1136,10 +1136,10 @@ Symlinks with no final component A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation. Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set -up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``pick_link()`` returning ``NULL``. +up in the ``nameidata``, and result in pick_link() returning ``NULL``. The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``". All symlinks starting -with "``/``" are detected in ``pick_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata`` +with "``/``" are detected in pick_link() which resets the ``nameidata`` to point to the effective filesystem root. If the symlink only contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all, so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and @@ -1157,9 +1157,9 @@ target file, not just the name of it. When you ``readlink`` these objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it has been unlinked or mounted over. When ``walk_component()`` follows one of these, the ``->get_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return -a string name, but instead calls ``nd_jump_link()`` which updates the +a string name, but instead calls nd_jump_link() which updates the ``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->get_link()`` then -returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and ``pick_link()`` +returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and pick_link() returns ``NULL``. Following the symlink in the final component @@ -1177,35 +1177,35 @@ potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another symlink. -This case is handled by relevant callers of ``link_path_walk()``, such as -``path_lookupat()``, ``path_openat()`` using a loop that calls ``link_path_walk()``, -and then handles the final component by calling ``open_last_lookups()`` or -``lookup_last()``. If it is a symlink that needs to be followed, -``open_last_lookups()`` or ``lookup_last()`` will set things up properly and +This case is handled by relevant callers of link_path_walk(), such as +path_lookupat(), path_openat() using a loop that calls link_path_walk(), +and then handles the final component by calling open_last_lookups() or +lookup_last(). If it is a symlink that needs to be followed, +open_last_lookups() or lookup_last() will set things up properly and return the path so that the loop repeats, calling -``link_path_walk()`` again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last +link_path_walk() again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last component of each symlink is another symlink. Of the various functions that examine the final component, -``open_last_lookups()`` is the most interesting as it works in tandem -with ``do_open()`` for opening a file. Part of ``open_last_lookups()`` runs -with ``i_rwsem`` held and this part is in a separate function: ``lookup_open()``. +open_last_lookups() is the most interesting as it works in tandem +with do_open() for opening a file. Part of open_last_lookups() runs +with ``i_rwsem`` held and this part is in a separate function: lookup_open(). -Explaining ``open_last_lookups()`` and ``do_open()`` completely is beyond the scope +Explaining open_last_lookups() and do_open() completely is beyond the scope of this article, but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring the code. -1. Rather than just finding the target file, ``do_open()`` is used after - ``open_last_lookup()`` to open +1. Rather than just finding the target file, do_open() is used after + open_last_lookup() to open it. If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for this. If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or will perform the separate ``i_op->lookup()`` and ``i_op->create()`` steps directly. In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or - created file will be performed by ``vfs_open()``, just as if the name + created file will be performed by vfs_open(), just as if the name were found in the dcache. -2. ``vfs_open()`` can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information +2. vfs_open() can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information wasn't quite current enough. If it's in RCU-walk ``-ECHILD`` will be returned otherwise ``-ESTALE`` is returned. When ``-ESTALE`` is returned, the caller may retry with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` flag set. @@ -1218,8 +1218,8 @@ the code. will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``. This is not permitted if ``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much - like for a non-creating open: ``lookup_last()`` or ``open_last_lookup()`` - returns a non ``NULL`` value, and ``link_path_walk()`` gets called and the + like for a non-creating open: lookup_last() or open_last_lookup() + returns a non ``NULL`` value, and link_path_walk() gets called and the open process continues on the symlink that was found. Updating the access time |