From 1019a359d3dc4b64d0e1e5a5efcb725d5e83994d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:44:03 +0800 Subject: sched/deadline: Fix stale yield state When we fail to start the deadline timer in update_curr_dl(), we forget to clear ->dl_yielded, resulting in wrecked time keeping. Since the natural place to clear both ->dl_yielded and ->dl_throttled is in replenish_dl_entity(); both are after all waiting for that event; make it so. Luckily since 67dfa1b756f2 ("sched/deadline: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()") the task_on_rq_queued() condition in dl_task_timer() must be true, and can therefore call enqueue_task_dl() unconditionally. Reported-by: Wanpeng Li Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Kirill Tkhai Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-4-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched/deadline.c') diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 7b684f9341a5..a027799ae130 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + pi_se->dl_deadline; dl_se->runtime = pi_se->dl_runtime; } + + if (dl_se->dl_yielded) + dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; + if (dl_se->dl_throttled) + dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; } /* @@ -536,23 +541,19 @@ again: sched_clock_tick(); update_rq_clock(rq); - dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; - dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; - if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { - enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH); - if (dl_task(rq->curr)) - check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0); - else - resched_curr(rq); + enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH); + if (dl_task(rq->curr)) + check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0); + else + resched_curr(rq); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP - /* - * Queueing this task back might have overloaded rq, - * check if we need to kick someone away. - */ - if (has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq)) - push_dl_task(rq); + /* + * Queueing this task back might have overloaded rq, + * check if we need to kick someone away. + */ + if (has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq)) + push_dl_task(rq); #endif - } unlock: raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); @@ -613,10 +614,9 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq) dl_se->runtime -= dl_se->dl_yielded ? 0 : delta_exec; if (dl_runtime_exceeded(rq, dl_se)) { + dl_se->dl_throttled = 1; __dequeue_task_dl(rq, curr, 0); - if (likely(start_dl_timer(dl_se, curr->dl.dl_boosted))) - dl_se->dl_throttled = 1; - else + if (unlikely(!start_dl_timer(dl_se, curr->dl.dl_boosted))) enqueue_task_dl(rq, curr, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH); if (!is_leftmost(curr, &rq->dl)) @@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) * its rq, the bandwidth timer callback (which clearly has not * run yet) will take care of this. */ - if (p->dl.dl_throttled) + if (p->dl.dl_throttled && !(flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)) return; enqueue_dl_entity(&p->dl, pi_se, flags); -- cgit v1.2.3