From eb4c5ea50e60aa8faaf6aae762cb06ee1c8e0b8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ivan Khoronzhuk Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:06:56 +0200 Subject: firmware: dmi_scan: Rename dmi_table to dmi_decode_table The "dmi_table" function looks like data instance, but it does DMI table decode. This patch renames it to "dmi_decode_table" name as more appropriate. That allows us to use "dmi_table" name for correct purposes. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare --- drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c index bba843c2b0ac..14a89123cb7c 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c @@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ static const char * __init dmi_string(const struct dmi_header *dm, u8 s) * We have to be cautious here. We have seen BIOSes with DMI pointers * pointing to completely the wrong place for example */ -static void dmi_table(u8 *buf, - void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *), - void *private_data) +static void dmi_decode_table(u8 *buf, + void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *), + void *private_data) { u8 *data = buf; int i = 0; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int __init dmi_walk_early(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, if (buf == NULL) return -1; - dmi_table(buf, decode, NULL); + dmi_decode_table(buf, decode, NULL); add_device_randomness(buf, dmi_len); @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ int dmi_walk(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *), if (buf == NULL) return -1; - dmi_table(buf, decode, private_data); + dmi_decode_table(buf, decode, private_data); dmi_unmap(buf); return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3