summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-08-13Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds4-14/+14
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Thomas Gleixner: - Cleanup and improvement of NUMA balancing - Refactoring and improvements to the PELT (Per Entity Load Tracking) code - Watchdog simplification and related cleanups - The usual pile of small incremental fixes and improvements * 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits) watchdog: Reduce message verbosity stop_machine: Reflow cpu_stop_queue_two_works() sched/numa: Move task_numa_placement() closer to numa_migrate_preferred() sched/numa: Use group_weights to identify if migration degrades locality sched/numa: Update the scan period without holding the numa_group lock sched/numa: Remove numa_has_capacity() sched/numa: Modify migrate_swap() to accept additional parameters sched/numa: Remove unused task_capacity from 'struct numa_stats' sched/numa: Skip nodes that are at 'hoplimit' sched/debug: Reverse the order of printing faults sched/numa: Use task faults only if numa_group is not yet set up sched/numa: Set preferred_node based on best_cpu sched/numa: Simplify load_too_imbalanced() sched/numa: Evaluate move once per node sched/numa: Remove redundant field sched/debug: Show the sum wait time of a task group sched/fair: Remove #ifdefs from scale_rt_capacity() sched/core: Remove get_cpu() from sched_fork() sched/cpufreq: Clarify sugov_get_util() sched/sysctl: Remove unused sched_time_avg_ms sysctl ...
2018-07-12Merge branches 'fixes1.2018.07.12b' and 'torture1.2018.07.12b' into HEADPaul E. McKenney4-130/+297
fixes1.2018.07.12b: Post-gp_seq miscellaneous fixes torture1.2018.07.12b: Post-gp_seq torture-test updates
2018-07-12rcutorture: Fix rcu_barrier successes counterJoel Fernandes (Google)1-5/+4
The rcutorture test module currently increments both successes and error for the barrier test upon error, which results in misleading statistics being printed. This commit therefore changes the code to increment the success counter only when the test actually passes. This change was tested by by returning from the barrier callback without incrementing the callback counter, thus introducing what appeared to rcutorture to be rcu_barrier() failures. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Add support to detect if boost kthread prio is too lowJoel Fernandes (Google)3-4/+37
When rcutorture is built in to the kernel, an earlier patch detects that and raises the priority of RCU's kthreads to allow rcutorture's RCU priority boosting tests to succeed. However, if rcutorture is built as a module, those priorities must be raised manually via the rcutree.kthread_prio kernel boot parameter. If this manual step is not taken, rcutorture's RCU priority boosting tests will fail due to kthread starvation. One approach would be to raise the default priority, but that risks breaking existing users. Another approach would be to allow runtime adjustment of RCU's kthread priorities, but that introduces numerous "interesting" race conditions. This patch therefore instead detects too-low priorities, and prints a message and disables the RCU priority boosting tests in that case. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Use monotonic timestamp for stall detectionArnd Bergmann1-2/+3
The get_seconds() call is deprecated because it overflows on 32-bit architectures. The algorithm in rcu_torture_stall() can deal with the overflow, but another problem here is that using a CLOCK_REALTIME stamp can lead to a false-positive stall warning when a settimeofday() happens concurrently. Using ktime_get_seconds() instead avoids those issues and will never overflow. The added cast to 'unsigned long' however is necessary to make ULONG_CMP_LT() work correctly. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Make boost test more robustJoel Fernandes (Google)1-6/+39
Currently, with RCU_BOOST disabled, I get no failures when forcing rcutorture to test RCU boost priority inversion. The reason seems to be that we don't check for failures if the callback never ran at all for the duration of the boost-test loop. Further, the 'rtb' and 'rtbf' counters seem to be used inconsistently. 'rtb' is incremented at the start of each test and 'rtbf' is incremented per-cpu on each failure of call_rcu. So its possible 'rtbf' > 'rtb'. To test the boost with rcutorture, I did following on a 4-CPU x86 machine: modprobe rcutorture test_boost=2 sleep 20 rmmod rcutorture With patch: rtbf: 8 rtb: 12 Without patch: rtbf: 0 rtb: 2 In summary this patch: - Increments failed and total test counters once per boost-test. - Checks for failure cases correctly. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Disable RT throttling for boost testsJoel Fernandes (Google)1-0/+29
Currently rcutorture is not able to torture RCU boosting properly. This is because the rcutorture's boost threads which are doing the torturing may be throttled due to RT throttling. This patch makes rcutorture use the right torture technique (unthrottled rcutorture boost tasks) for torturing RCU so that the test fails correctly when no boost is available. Currently this requires accessing sysctl_sched_rt_runtime directly, but that should be Ok since rcutorture is test code. Such direct access is also only possible if rcutorture is used as a built-in so make it conditional on that. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Emphasize testing of single reader protection typePaul E. McKenney1-1/+8
For RCU implementations supporting multiple types of reader protection, rcutorture currently randomly selects the combinations of types of protection for each phase of each reader. The problem with this, for example, given the four kinds of protection for RCU-sched (local_irq_disable(), local_bh_disable(), preempt_disable(), and rcu_read_lock_sched()), the reader will be protected by a single mechanism only 25% of the time. We really heavier testing of single read-side mechanisms. This commit therefore uses only a single mechanism about 60% of the time, half of the time explicitly and one-eighth of the time by chance. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Handle extended read-side critical sectionsPaul E. McKenney1-6/+152
This commit enables rcutorture to test whether RCU properly aggregates different types of read-side critical sections into a larger section covering the set. It does this by extending an initial read-side critical section randomly for a random number of extensions. There is a new rcu_torture_ops field ->extendable that specifies what extensions are permitted for a given flavor of RCU (for example, SRCU does not permit any extensions, while RCU-sched permits all types). Note that if a given operation (for example, local_bh_disable()) extends an RCU read-side critical section, then rcutorture feels free to also start and end the critical section with that operation's type of disabling. Disabling operations include local_bh_disable(), local_irq_disable(), and preempt_disable(). This commit also adds a new "busted_srcud" torture type, which verifies rcutorture's ability to detect extensions of RCU read-side critical sections that are not handled. Gotta test the test, after all! Note that it is not legal to invoke local_bh_disable() with interrupts disabled, and this transition is avoided by overriding the random-number generator when it wants to call local_bh_disable() while interrupts are disabled. The code instead leaves both interrupts and bh/softirq disabled in this case. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Make rcu_torture_timer() use rcu_torture_one_read()Paul E. McKenney1-46/+1
This commit saves a few lines of code by making rcu_torture_timer() invoke rcu_torture_one_read(), thus completing the consolidation of code between rcu_torture_timer() and rcu_torture_reader(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Use per-CPU random state for rcu_torture_timer()Paul E. McKenney1-5/+5
Currently, the rcu_torture_timer() function uses a single global torture_random_state structure protected by a single global lock. This conflicts to some extent with performance and scalability, but even more with the goal of consolidating read-side testing with rcu_torture_reader(). This commit therefore creates a per-CPU torture_random_state structure for use by rcu_torture_timer() and eliminates the lock. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Make rcu_torture_timer_rand static, per 0day Test Robot report. ]
2018-07-12rcutorture: Use atomic increment for n_rcu_torture_timersPaul E. McKenney1-3/+3
Currently, rcu_torture_timer() relies on a lock to guard updates to n_rcu_torture_timers. Unfortunately, consolidating code with rcu_torture_reader() will dispense with this lock. This commit therefore makes n_rcu_torture_timers be an atomic_long_t and uses atomic_long_inc() to carry out the update. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Extract common code from rcu_torture_reader()Paul E. McKenney1-43/+55
This commit extracts the code executed on each pass through the loop in rcu_torture_reader() into a new rcu_torture_one_read() function. This new function will also be used by rcu_torture_timer(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcuperf: Remove unused torturing_tasks() functionPaul E. McKenney1-5/+0
The torturing_tasks() function in rcuperf.c is not used, so this commit removes it. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove rcutorture test version and sequence numberPaul E. McKenney3-44/+1
Back when RCU had a debugfs interface, there was a test version and sequence number that allowed associating debugfs data with a particular test run, where the test run started with modprobe and ended with rmmod, which was how tests were run back on the old ABAT system within IBM. But rcutorture testing no longer runs on ABAT, and there is no longer an RCU debugfs interface, so there is no longer any need for test versions and sequence numbers. This commit therefore removes the rcutorture_record_test_transition() and rcutorture_record_progress() functions, and along with them the rcutorture_testseq and rcutorture_vernum variables that they update. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcutorture: Change units of onoff_interval to jiffiesPaul E. McKenney1-2/+2
Some RCU bugs have been sensitive to the frequency of CPU-hotplug operations, which have been gradually increased over time. But this frequency is now at the one-second lower limit that can be specified using the rcutorture.onoff_interval kernel parameter. This commit therefore changes the units of rcutorture.onoff_interval from seconds to jiffies, and also sets the value specified for this kernel parameter in the TREE03 rcutorture scenario to 200, which is 200 milliseconds for HZ=1000. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Assign higher prio to RCU threads if rcutorture is built-inJoel Fernandes (Google)1-1/+5
The rcutorture RCU priority boosting tests fail even with CONFIG_RCU_BOOST set because rcutorture's threads run at the same priority as the default RCU kthreads (RT class with priority of 1). This patch checks if RCU torture is built into the kernel and if so, assigns RT priority 1 to the RCU threads, allowing the rcutorture boost tests to pass. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12srcu: Add grace-period number to rcutorture statistics printoutPaul E. McKenney1-1/+2
This commit adds the SRCU grace-period number to the rcutorture statistics printout, which allows it to be compared to the rcutorture "Writer stall state" message. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Print stall-warning NMI dyntick state in hexadecimalPaul E. McKenney1-1/+1
The ->dynticks_nmi_nesting field records the nesting depth of both interrupt and NMI handlers. Because the kernel can enter interrupts and never leave them (and vice versa) and because NMIs can interrupt manipulation of the ->dynticks_nmi_nesting field, the values in this field must be both chosen and maniupated very carefully. As a result, although the value is zero when the corresponding CPU is executing neither an interrupt nor an NMI handler, it is 4,611,686,018,427,387,906 on 64-bit systems when there is a single level of interrupt/NMI handling in progress. This number is difficult to remember and interpret, so this commit switches the output to hexadecimal, resulting in the much nicer 0x4000000000000002. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Make rcu_seq_diff() more exactPaul E. McKenney1-1/+14
The current implementatation of rcu_seq_diff() follows tradition in providing a rough-and-ready approximation of the number of elapsed grace periods between the two rcu_seq values. However, this difference is used to flag RCU-failure "near misses", which can be a valuable debugging aid, so more exactitude would be an improvement. This commit therefore improves the accuracy of rcu_seq_diff(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Check the range of jiffies_till_{first,next}_fqs when setting themByungchul Park1-13/+32
Currently, the range of jiffies_till_{first,next}_fqs are checked and adjusted on and on in the loop of rcu_gp_kthread on runtime. However, it's enough to check them only when setting them, not every time in the loop. So make them handled on a setting time via sysfs. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add diagnostics for rcutorture writer stall warningPaul E. McKenney1-0/+21
This commit adds any in-the-future ->gp_seq_needed fields to the diagnostics for an rcutorture writer stall warning message. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add comment to the last sleep in the rcu tasks loopSteven Rostedt (VMware)1-0/+1
At the end of rcu_tasks_kthread() there's a lonely schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() call with no apparent rationale for its existence. But there is. It is to keep the thread from going into a tight loop if there's some anomaly. That really needs a comment. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524223839.GU3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacksSteven Rostedt (VMware)1-2/+15
Joel Fernandes found that the synchronize_rcu_tasks() was taking a significant amount of time. He demonstrated it with the following test: # cd /sys/kernel/tracing # while [ 1 ]; do x=1; done & # echo '__schedule_bug:traceon' > set_ftrace_filter # time echo '!__schedule_bug:traceon' > set_ftrace_filter; real 0m1.064s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.004s Where it takes a little over a second to perform the synchronize, because there's a loop that waits 1 second at a time for tasks to get through their quiescent points when there's a task that must be waited for. After discussion we came up with a simple way to wait for holdouts but increase the time for each iteration of the loop but no more than a full second. With the new patch we have: # time echo '!__schedule_bug:traceon' > set_ftrace_filter; real 0m0.131s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.004s Which drops it down to 13% of what the original wait time was. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180523063815.198302-2-joel@joelfernandes.org Reported-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap worksJoel Fernandes (Google)1-1/+11
rcu_seq_snap may be tricky to decipher. Lets document how it works with an example to make it easier. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Shrink comment as suggested by Peter Zijlstra. ]
2018-07-12rcu: Use RCU CPU stall timeout for rcu_check_gp_start_stall()Paul E. McKenney1-8/+9
Currently, rcu_check_gp_start_stall() waits for one second after the first request before complaining that a grace period has not yet started. This was desirable while testing the conversion from ->future_gp_needed[] to ->gp_seq_needed, but it is a bit on the hair-trigger side for production use under heavy load. This commit therefore makes this wait time be exactly that of the RCU CPU stall warning, allowing easy adjustment of both timeouts to suit the distribution or installation at hand. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove __maybe_unused from rcu_cpu_has_callbacks()Paul E. McKenney1-1/+1
The rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() function is now used in all configurations, so this commit removes the __maybe_unused. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_perf_print_module_parms()Paul E. McKenney1-1/+1
This function is in rcuperf.c, which is not an include file, so there is no problem dropping the "inline", especially given that this function is invoked only twice per rcuperf run. This commit therefore delegates the inlining decision to the compiler by dropping the "inline". Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_torture_print_module_parms()Paul E. McKenney1-1/+1
This function is in rcutorture.c, which is not an include file, so there is no problem dropping the "inline", especially given that this function is invoked only twice per rcutorture run. This commit therefore delegates the inlining decision to the compiler by dropping the "inline". Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove "inline" from panic_on_rcu_stall() and rcu_blocking_is_gp()Paul E. McKenney1-2/+2
These functions are in kernel/rcu/tree.c, which is not an include file, so there is no problem dropping the "inline", especially given that these functions are nowhere near a fastpath. This commit therefore delegates the inlining decision to the compiler by dropping the "inline". Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove unused local variable "cpu"Paul E. McKenney1-2/+0
One danger of using __maybe_unused is that the compiler doesn't yell at you when you remove the last reference, witness rcu_bind_gp_kthread() and its local variable "cpu". This commit removes this local variable. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu() functionPaul E. McKenney2-18/+0
The rcu_kick_nohz_cpu() function is no longer used, and the functionality it used to provide is now provided by a call to resched_cpu() in the force-quiescent-state function rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(). This commit therefore removes rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Clarify and correct the rcu_preempt_qs() header commentPaul E. McKenney1-6/+10
The rcu_preempt_qs() function only applies to the CPU, not the task. A task really is allowed to invoke this function while in an RCU-preempt read-side critical section, but only if it has first added itself to some leaf rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Inline rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() into its sole callerPaul E. McKenney1-16/+7
The rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() function is invoked only from rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(), and neither function is particularly large. This commit therefore saves a few lines by inlining rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() into rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Mark task as .need_qs less aggressivelyPaul E. McKenney1-1/+4
If any scheduling-clock interrupt interrupts an RCU-preempt read-side critical section, the interrupted task's ->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs field is set. This causes the outermost rcu_read_unlock() to incur the extra overhead of calling into rcu_read_unlock_special(). This commit reduces that overhead by setting ->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs only if the grace period has been in effect for more than one second. Why one second? Because this is comfortably smaller than the minimum RCU CPU stall-warning timeout of three seconds, but long enough that the .need_qs marking should happen quite rarely. And if your RCU read-side critical section has run on-CPU for a full second, it is not unreasonable to invest some CPU time in ending the grace period quickly. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Improve RCU-tasks naming and commentsPaul E. McKenney2-14/+15
The naming and comments associated with some RCU-tasks code make the faulty assumption that context switches due to cond_resched() are voluntary. As several people pointed out, this is not the case. This commit therefore updates function names and comments to better reflect current reality. Reported-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Reported-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging outputJoe Perches5-14/+20
This commit also adjusts some whitespace while in the area. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Revert string-breaking %s as requested by Andy Shevchenko. ]
2018-07-12rcu: Improve rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() reportingByungchul Park2-5/+3
We expect a quiescent state of TASKS_RCU when cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is called, no matter whether it actually be scheduled or not. However, it currently doesn't report the quiescent state when the task enters into __schedule() as it's called with preempt = true. So make it report the quiescent state unconditionally when cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is called. And in TINY_RCU, even though the quiescent state of rcu_bh also should be reported when the tick interrupt comes from user, it doesn't. So make it reported. Lastly in TREE_RCU, rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() should be reported when the tick interrupt comes from not only user but also idle, as an extended quiescent state. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Simplify rcutiny portion given no RCU-tasks for !PREEMPT. ]
2018-07-12rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() staticPaul E. McKenney1-1/+2
Because rcu_read_unlock_special() is no longer used outside of kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h, this commit makes it static. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add diagnostics for offline CPUs failing to report QSPaul E. McKenney2-0/+23
CPUs are expected to report quiescent states when coming online and when going offline, and grace-period initialization is supposed to handle any race conditions where a CPU's ->qsmask bit is set just after it goes offline. This commit adds diagnostics for the case where an offline CPU nevertheless has a grace period waiting on it. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Record ->gp_state for both phases of grace-period initializationPaul E. McKenney2-4/+10
Grace-period initialization first processes any recent CPU-hotplug operations, and then initializes state for the new grace period. These two phases of initialization are currently not distinguished in debug prints, but the distinction is valuable in a number of debug situations. This commit therefore introduces two new values for ->gp_state, RCU_GP_ONOFF and RCU_GP_INIT, in order to make this distinction. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add CPU online/offline state to dump_blkd_tasks()Paul E. McKenney3-10/+39
Interactions between CPU-hotplug operations and grace-period initialization can result in dump_blkd_tasks(). One of the first debugging actions in this case is to search back in dmesg to work out which of the affected rcu_node structure's CPUs are online and to determine the last CPU-hotplug operation affecting any of those CPUs. This can be laborious and error-prone, especially when console output is lost. This commit therefore causes dump_blkd_tasks() to dump the state of the affected rcu_node structure's CPUs and the last grace period during which the last offline and online operation affected each of these CPUs. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add up-tree information to dump_blkd_tasks() diagnosticsPaul E. McKenney1-4/+6
This commit updates dump_blkd_tasks() to print out quiescent-state bitmasks for the rcu_node structures further up the tree. This information helps debugging of interactions between CPU-hotplug operations and RCU grace-period initialization. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove CPU-hotplug failsafe from force-quiescent-state code pathPaul E. McKenney2-9/+1
Now that quiescent states for newly offlined CPUs are reported either when that CPU goes offline or at the end of grace-period initialization, the CPU-hotplug failsafe in the force-quiescent-state code path is no longer needed. This commit therefore removes this failsafe. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Remove failsafe check for lost quiescent statePaul E. McKenney1-13/+3
Now that quiescent-state reporting is fully event-driven, this commit removes the check for a lost quiescent state from force_qs_rnp(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Move grace-period pre-init delay after pre-initPaul E. McKenney1-1/+1
The main race with the early part of grace-period initialization appears to be with CPU hotplug. To more fully open this race window, this commit moves the rcu_gp_slow() from the beginning of the early initialization loop to follow that loop, thus widening the race window, especially for the rcu_node structures that are initialized last. This commit also expands rcutree.gp_preinit_delay from 3 to 12, giving the same overall delay in the grace period, but concentrated in the spot where it will do the most good. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Add RCU-preempt check for waiting on newly onlined CPUPaul E. McKenney1-0/+3
RCU should only be waiting on CPUs that were online at the time that the current grace period started. Failure to abide by this rule can result in confusing splats during grace-period cleanup and initialization. This commit therefore adds a check to RCU-preempt's preempted-task queuing that checks for waiting on newly onlined CPUs. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Fix grace-period hangs due to race with CPU offlinePaul E. McKenney2-0/+10
Without special fail-safe quiescent-state-propagation checks, grace-period hangs can result from the following scenario: 1. CPU 1 goes offline. 2. Because CPU 1 is the only CPU in the system blocking the current grace period, the grace period ends as soon as rcu_cleanup_dying_idle_cpu()'s call to rcu_report_qs_rnp() returns. 3. At this point, the leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock is no longer held: rcu_report_qs_rnp() has released it, as it must in order to awaken the RCU grace-period kthread. 4. At this point, that same leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmaskinitnext field still records CPU 1 as being online. This is absolutely necessary because the scheduler uses RCU (in this case on the wake-up path while awakening RCU's grace-period kthread), and ->qsmaskinitnext contains RCU's idea as to which CPUs are online. Therefore, invoking rcu_report_qs_rnp() after clearing CPU 1's bit from ->qsmaskinitnext would result in a lockdep-RCU splat due to RCU being used from an offline CPU. 5. RCU's grace-period kthread awakens, sees that the old grace period has completed and that a new one is needed. It therefore starts a new grace period, but because CPU 1's leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmaskinitnext field still shows CPU 1 as being online, this new grace period is initialized to wait for a quiescent state from the now-offline CPU 1. 6. Without the fail-safe force-quiescent-state checks, there would be no quiescent state from the now-offline CPU 1, which would eventually result in RCU CPU stall warnings and memory exhaustion. It would be good to get rid of the special fail-safe quiescent-state propagation checks, and thus it would be good to fix things so that the above scenario cannot happen. This commit therefore adds a new ->ofl_lock to the rcu_state structure. This lock is held by rcu_gp_init() across the applying of buffered online and offline operations to the rcu_node tree, and it is also held by rcu_cleanup_dying_idle_cpu() when buffering a new offline operation. This prevents rcu_gp_init() from acquiring the leaf rcu_node structure's lock during the interval between when rcu_cleanup_dying_idle_cpu() invokes rcu_report_qs_rnp(), which releases ->lock and the re-acquisition of that same lock. This in turn prevents the failure scenario outlined above, and will hopefully eventually allow removal of the offline-CPU checks from the force-quiescent-state code path. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Fix grace-period hangs from mid-init task resumePaul E. McKenney1-3/+17
Without special fail-safe quiescent-state-propagation checks, grace-period hangs can result from the following scenario: 1. A task running on a given CPU is preempted in its RCU read-side critical section. 2. That CPU goes offline, and there are now no online CPUs corresponding to that CPU's leaf rcu_node structure. 3. The rcu_gp_init() function does the first phase of grace-period initialization, and sets the aforementioned leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmaskinit field to all zeroes. Because there is a blocked task, it does not propagate the zeroing of either ->qsmaskinit or ->qsmaskinitnext up the rcu_node tree. 4. The task resumes on some other CPU and exits its critical section. There is no grace period in progress, so the resulting quiescent state is not reported up the tree. 5. The rcu_gp_init() function does the second phase of grace-period initialization, which results in the leaf rcu_node structure being initialized to expect no further quiescent states, but with that structure's parent expecting a quiescent-state report. The parent will never receive a quiescent state from this leaf rcu_node structure, so the grace period will hang, resulting in RCU CPU stall warnings. It would be good to get rid of the special fail-safe quiescent-state propagation checks. This commit therefore checks the leaf rcu_node structure's ->wait_blkd_tasks field during grace-period initialization. If this flag is set, the rcu_report_qs_rnp() is invoked to immediately report the possible quiescent state. While in the neighborhood, this commit also report quiescent states for any CPUs that went offline between the two phases of grace-period initialization, thus reducing grace-period delays and hopefully eventually allowing removal of offline-CPU checks from the force-quiescent-state code path. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-07-12rcu: Suppress false-positive splats from mid-init task resumePaul E. McKenney1-1/+2
Consider the following sequence of events in a PREEMPT=y kernel: 1. All CPUs corresponding to a given leaf rcu_node structure are offline. 2. The first phase of the rcu_gp_init() function's grace-period initialization runs, and sets that rcu_node structure's ->qsmaskinit to zero, as it should. 3. One of the CPUs corresponding to that rcu_node structure comes back online. Note that because this CPU came online after the grace period started, this grace period can safely ignore this newly onlined CPU. 4. A task running on the newly onlined CPU enters an RCU-preempt read-side critical section, and is then preempted. Because the corresponding rcu_node structure's ->qsmask is zero, rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue() leaves the rcu_node structure's ->gp_tasks field NULL, as it should. 5. The rcu_gp_init() function continues running the second phase of grace-period initialization. The ->qsmask field of the parent of the aforementioned leaf rcu_node structure is set to not expect a quiescent state from the leaf, as is only right and proper. However, when rcu_gp_init() reaches the leaf, it invokes rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(), which sees that the leaf's ->blkd_tasks list is non-empty, and therefore sets the leaf's ->gp_tasks field to reference the first task on that list. 6. The grace period ends before the preempted task resumes, which is perfectly fine, given that this grace period was under no obligation to wait for that task to exit its late-starting RCU-preempt read-side critical section. Unfortunately, the leaf's ->gp_tasks field is non-NULL, so rcu_gp_cleanup() splats. After all, it appears to rcu_gp_cleanup() that the grace period failed to wait for a task that was supposed to be blocking that grace period. This commit avoids this false-positive splat by adding a check of both ->qsmaskinit and ->wait_blkd_tasks to rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(). If both ->qsmaskinit and ->wait_blkd_tasks are zero, then the task must have entered its RCU-preempt read-side critical section late (after all, the CPU that it is running on was not online at that time), which means that the upper-level rcu_node structure won't be waiting for anything on the leaf anyway. If ->wait_blkd_tasks is non-zero, then there is at least one task on ths rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list whose RCU read-side critical section predates the current grace period. If ->qsmaskinit is non-zero, there is at least one CPU that was online at the start of the current grace period. Thus, if both are zero, there is nothing to wait for. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>