summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ext4
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-07-09Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds20-441/+1994
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "The first major feature for ext4 this merge window is the largedir feature, which allows ext4 directories to support over 2 billion directory entries (assuming ~64 byte file names; in practice, users will run into practical performance limits first.) This feature was originally written by the Lustre team, and credit goes to Artem Blagodarenko from Seagate for getting this feature upstream. The second major major feature allows ext4 to support extended attribute values up to 64k. This feature was also originally from Lustre, and has been enhanced by Tahsin Erdogan from Google with a deduplication feature so that if multiple files have the same xattr value (for example, Windows ACL's stored by Samba), only one copy will be stored on disk for encoding and caching efficiency. We also have the usual set of bug fixes, cleanups, and optimizations" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (47 commits) ext4: fix spelling mistake: "prellocated" -> "preallocated" ext4: fix __ext4_new_inode() journal credits calculation ext4: skip ext4_init_security() and encryption on ea_inodes fs: generic_block_bmap(): initialize all of the fields in the temp bh ext4: change fast symlink test to not rely on i_blocks ext4: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted file ext4: don't bother checking for encryption key in ->mmap() ext4: check return value of kstrtoull correctly in reserved_clusters_store ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems ext4: return EFSBADCRC if a bad checksum error is found in ext4_find_entry() ext4: return EIO on read error in ext4_find_entry ext4: forbid encrypting root directory ext4: send parallel discards on commit completions ext4: avoid unnecessary stalls in ext4_evict_inode() ext4: add nombcache mount option ext4: strong binding of xattr inode references ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removes ext4: reserve space for xattr entries/names quota: add get_inode_usage callback to transfer multi-inode charges ext4: xattr inode deduplication ...
2017-07-09Merge tag 'fscrypt_for_linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/fscrypt Pull fscrypt updates from Ted Ts'o: "Add support for 128-bit AES and some cleanups to fscrypt" * tag 'fscrypt_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/fscrypt: fscrypt: make ->dummy_context() return bool fscrypt: add support for AES-128-CBC fscrypt: inline fscrypt_free_filename()
2017-07-07Merge tag 'for-linus-v4.13-2' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux Pull Writeback error handling updates from Jeff Layton: "This pile represents the bulk of the writeback error handling fixes that I have for this cycle. Some of the earlier patches in this pile may look trivial but they are prerequisites for later patches in the series. The aim of this set is to improve how we track and report writeback errors to userland. Most applications that care about data integrity will periodically call fsync/fdatasync/msync to ensure that their writes have made it to the backing store. For a very long time, we have tracked writeback errors using two flags in the address_space: AS_EIO and AS_ENOSPC. Those flags are set when a writeback error occurs (via mapping_set_error) and are cleared as a side-effect of filemap_check_errors (as you noted yesterday). This model really sucks for userland. Only the first task to call fsync (or msync or fdatasync) will see the error. Any subsequent task calling fsync on a file will get back 0 (unless another writeback error occurs in the interim). If I have several tasks writing to a file and calling fsync to ensure that their writes got stored, then I need to have them coordinate with one another. That's difficult enough, but in a world of containerized setups that coordination may even not be possible. But wait...it gets worse! The calls to filemap_check_errors can be buried pretty far down in the call stack, and there are internal callers of filemap_write_and_wait and the like that also end up clearing those errors. Many of those callers ignore the error return from that function or return it to userland at nonsensical times (e.g. truncate() or stat()). If I get back -EIO on a truncate, there is no reason to think that it was because some previous writeback failed, and a subsequent fsync() will (incorrectly) return 0. This pile aims to do three things: 1) ensure that when a writeback error occurs that that error will be reported to userland on a subsequent fsync/fdatasync/msync call, regardless of what internal callers are doing 2) report writeback errors on all file descriptions that were open at the time that the error occurred. This is a user-visible change, but I think most applications are written to assume this behavior anyway. Those that aren't are unlikely to be hurt by it. 3) document what filesystems should do when there is a writeback error. Today, there is very little consistency between them, and a lot of cargo-cult copying. We need to make it very clear what filesystems should do in this situation. To achieve this, the set adds a new data type (errseq_t) and then builds new writeback error tracking infrastructure around that. Once all of that is in place, we change the filesystems to use the new infrastructure for reporting wb errors to userland. Note that this is just the initial foray into cleaning up this mess. There is a lot of work remaining here: 1) convert the rest of the filesystems in a similar fashion. Once the initial set is in, then I think most other fs' will be fairly simple to convert. Hopefully most of those can in via individual filesystem trees. 2) convert internal waiters on writeback to use errseq_t for detecting errors instead of relying on the AS_* flags. I have some draft patches for this for ext4, but they are not quite ready for prime time yet. This was a discussion topic this year at LSF/MM too. If you're interested in the gory details, LWN has some good articles about this: https://lwn.net/Articles/718734/ https://lwn.net/Articles/724307/" * tag 'for-linus-v4.13-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux: btrfs: minimal conversion to errseq_t writeback error reporting on fsync xfs: minimal conversion to errseq_t writeback error reporting ext4: use errseq_t based error handling for reporting data writeback errors fs: convert __generic_file_fsync to use errseq_t based reporting block: convert to errseq_t based writeback error tracking dax: set errors in mapping when writeback fails Documentation: flesh out the section in vfs.txt on storing and reporting writeback errors mm: set both AS_EIO/AS_ENOSPC and errseq_t in mapping_set_error fs: new infrastructure for writeback error handling and reporting lib: add errseq_t type and infrastructure for handling it mm: don't TestClearPageError in __filemap_fdatawait_range mm: clear AS_EIO/AS_ENOSPC when writeback initiation fails jbd2: don't clear and reset errors after waiting on writeback buffer: set errors in mapping at the time that the error occurs fs: check for writeback errors after syncing out buffers in generic_file_fsync buffer: use mapping_set_error instead of setting the flag mm: fix mapping_set_error call in me_pagecache_dirty
2017-07-06ext4: fix spelling mistake: "prellocated" -> "preallocated"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in mb_debug debug message Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-07-06ext4: use errseq_t based error handling for reporting data writeback errorsJeff Layton1-1/+1
Add a call to filemap_report_wb_err at the end of ext4_sync_file. This will ensure that we check and advance the errseq_t in the file, which allows us to track and report errors on all open fds when they occur. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-06ext4: fix __ext4_new_inode() journal credits calculationTahsin Erdogan5-34/+85
ea_inode feature allows creating extended attributes that are up to 64k in size. Update __ext4_new_inode() to pick increased credit limits. To avoid overallocating too many journal credits, update __ext4_xattr_set_credits() to make a distinction between xattr create vs update. This helps __ext4_new_inode() because all attributes are known to be new, so we can save credits that are normally needed to delete old values. Also, have fscrypt specify its maximum context size so that we don't end up allocating credits for 64k size. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-07-06ext4: skip ext4_init_security() and encryption on ea_inodesTahsin Erdogan1-5/+6
Extended attribute inodes are internal to ext4. Adding encryption/security related attributes on them would mean dealing with nested calls into ea code. Since they have no direct exposure to user mode, just avoid creating ea entries for them. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-07-04ext4: change fast symlink test to not rely on i_blocksTahsin Erdogan1-7/+13
ext4_inode_info->i_data is the storage area for 4 types of data: a) Extents data b) Inline data c) Block map d) Fast symlink data (symlink length < 60) Extents data case is positively identified by EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS flag. Inline data case is also obvious because of EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA flag. Distinguishing c) and d) however requires additional logic. This currently relies on i_blocks count. After subtracting external xattr block from i_blocks, if it is greater than 0 then we know that some data blocks exist, so there must be a block map. This logic got broken after ea_inode feature was added. That feature charges the data blocks of external xattr inodes to the referencing inode and so adds them to the i_blocks. To fix this, we could subtract ea_inode blocks by iterating through all xattr entries and then check whether remaining i_blocks count is zero. Besides being complicated, this won't change the fact that the current way of distinguishing between c) and d) is fragile. The alternative solution is to test whether i_size is less than 60 to determine fast symlink case. ext4_symlink() uses the same test to decide whether to store the symlink in i_data. There is one caveat to address before this can work though. If an inode's i_nlink is zero during eviction, its i_size is set to zero and its data is truncated. If system crashes before inode is removed from the orphan list, next boot orphan cleanup may find the inode with zero i_size. So, a symlink that had its data stored in a block may now appear to be a fast symlink. The solution used in this patch is to treat i_size = 0 as a non-fast symlink case. A zero sized symlink is not legal so the only time this can happen is the mentioned scenario. This is also logically correct because a i_size = 0 symlink has no data stored in i_data. Suggested-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
2017-06-27ext4: add support for passing in write hints for buffered writesJens Axboe1-0/+2
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-06-23fscrypt: make ->dummy_context() return boolEric Biggers1-1/+1
This makes it consistent with ->is_encrypted(), ->empty_dir(), and fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-23ext4: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted fileEric Biggers1-0/+8
Currently, filesystems allow truncate(2) on an encrypted file without the encryption key. However, it's impossible to correctly handle the case where the size being truncated to is not a multiple of the filesystem block size, because that would require decrypting the final block, zeroing the part beyond i_size, then encrypting the block. As other modifications to encrypted file contents are prohibited without the key, just prohibit truncate(2) as well, making it fail with ENOKEY. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-23ext4: don't bother checking for encryption key in ->mmap()Eric Biggers1-7/+0
Since only an open file can be mmap'ed, and we only allow open()ing an encrypted file when its key is available, there is no need to check for the key again before permitting each mmap(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-23ext4: check return value of kstrtoull correctly in reserved_clusters_storeChao Yu1-1/+1
kstrtoull returns 0 on success, however, in reserved_clusters_store we will return -EINVAL if kstrtoull returns 0, it makes us fail to update reserved_clusters value through sysfs. Fixes: 76d33bca5581b1dd5c3157fa168db849a784ada4 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4 Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-23ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystemsDarrick J. Wong1-0/+4
For 1k-block filesystems, the filesystem starts at block 1, not block 0. This fact is recorded in s_first_data_block, so use that to bump up the start_fsb before we start querying the filesystem for its space map. Without this, ext4/026 fails on 1k block ext4 because various functions (notably ext4_get_group_no_and_offset) don't know what to do with an fsblock that is "before" the start of the filesystem and return garbage results (blockgroup 2^32-1, etc.) that confuse fsmap. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-23ext4: return EFSBADCRC if a bad checksum error is found in ext4_find_entry()Theodore Ts'o1-1/+2
Previously a bad directory block with a bad checksum is skipped; we should be returning EFSBADCRC (aka EBADMSG). Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-23ext4: return EIO on read error in ext4_find_entryKhazhismel Kumykov1-2/+2
Previously, a read error would be ignored and we would eventually return NULL from ext4_find_entry, which signals "no such file or directory". We should be returning EIO. Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
2017-06-23ext4: forbid encrypting root directoryEric Biggers1-0/+9
Currently it's possible to encrypt all files and directories on an ext4 filesystem by deleting everything, including lost+found, then setting an encryption policy on the root directory. However, this is incompatible with e2fsck because e2fsck expects to find, create, and/or write to lost+found and does not have access to any encryption keys. Especially problematic is that if e2fsck can't find lost+found, it will create it without regard for whether the root directory is encrypted. This is wrong for obvious reasons, and it causes a later run of e2fsck to consider the lost+found directory entry to be corrupted. Encrypting the root directory may also be of limited use because it is the "all-or-nothing" use case, for which dm-crypt can be used instead. (By design, encryption policies are inherited and cannot be overridden; so the root directory having an encryption policy implies that all files and directories on the filesystem have that same encryption policy.) In any case, encrypting the root directory is broken currently and must not be allowed; so start returning an error if userspace requests it. For now only do this in ext4, because f2fs and ubifs do not appear to have the lost+found requirement. We could move it into fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() later if desired, though. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
2017-06-22ext4: send parallel discards on commit completionsDaeho Jeong4-53/+100
Now, when we mount ext4 filesystem with '-o discard' option, we have to issue all the discard commands for the blocks to be deallocated and wait for the completion of the commands on the commit complete phase. Because this procedure might involve a lot of sequential combinations of issuing discard commands and waiting for that, the delay of this procedure might be too much long, even to 17.0s in our test, and it results in long commit delay and fsync() performance degradation. To reduce this kind of delay, instead of adding callback for each extent and handling all of them in a sequential manner on commit phase, we instead add a separate list of extents to free to the superblock and then process this list at once after transaction commits so that we can issue all the discard commands in a parallel manner like XFS filesystem. Finally, we could enhance the discard command handling performance. The result was such that 17.0s delay of a single commit in the worst case has been enhanced to 4.8s. Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: Hobin Woo <hobin.woo@samsung.com> Tested-by: Kitae Lee <kitae87.lee@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-06-22ext4: avoid unnecessary stalls in ext4_evict_inode()Jan Kara1-1/+2
These days inode reclaim calls evict_inode() only when it has no pages in the mapping. In that case it is not necessary to wait for transaction commit in ext4_evict_inode() as there can be no pages waiting to be committed. So avoid unnecessary transaction waiting in that case. We still have to keep the check for the case where ext4_evict_inode() gets called from other paths (e.g. umount) where inode still can have some page cache pages. Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: add nombcache mount optionTahsin Erdogan3-28/+59
The main purpose of mb cache is to achieve deduplication in extended attributes. In use cases where opportunity for deduplication is unlikely, it only adds overhead. Add a mount option to explicitly turn off mb cache. Suggested-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: strong binding of xattr inode referencesTahsin Erdogan1-39/+65
To verify that a xattr entry is not pointing to the wrong xattr inode, we currently check that the target inode has EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag set and also the entry size matches the target inode size. For stronger validation, also incorporate crc32c hash of the value into the e_hash field. This is done regardless of whether the entry lives in the inode body or external attribute block. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removesTahsin Erdogan1-24/+26
When an extended attribute block is modified, ext4_xattr_hash_entry() recalculates e_hash for the entry that is pointed by s->here. This is unnecessary if the modification is to remove an entry. Currently, if the removed entry is the last one and there are other entries remaining, hash calculation targets the just erased entry which has been filled with zeroes and effectively does nothing. If the removed entry is not the last one and there are more entries, this time it will recalculate hash on the next entry which is totally unnecessary. Fix these by moving the decision on when to recalculate hash to ext4_xattr_set_entry(). Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: reserve space for xattr entries/namesTahsin Erdogan1-0/+20
New ea_inode feature allows putting large xattr values into external inodes. struct ext4_xattr_entry and the attribute name however have to remain in the inode extra space or external attribute block. Once that space is exhausted, no further entries can be added. Some of that space could also be used by values that fit in there at the time of addition. So, a single xattr entry whose value barely fits in the external block could prevent further entries being added. To mitigate the problem, this patch introduces a notion of reserved space in the external attribute block that cannot be used by value data. This reserve is enforced when ea_inode feature is enabled. The amount of reserve is arbitrarily chosen to be min(block_size/8, 1024). The table below shows how much space is reserved for each block size and the guaranteed mininum number of entries that can be placed in the external attribute block. block size reserved bytes entries (name length = 16) 1k 128 3 2k 256 7 4k 512 15 8k 1024 31 16k 1024 31 32k 1024 31 64k 1024 31 Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22quota: add get_inode_usage callback to transfer multi-inode chargesTahsin Erdogan5-10/+81
Ext4 ea_inode feature allows storing xattr values in external inodes to be able to store values that are bigger than a block in size. Ext4 also has deduplication support for these type of inodes. With deduplication, the actual storage waste is eliminated but the users of such inodes are still charged full quota for the inodes as if there was no sharing happening in the background. This design requires ext4 to manually charge the users because the inodes are shared. An implication of this is that, if someone calls chown on a file that has such references we need to transfer the quota for the file and xattr inodes. Current dquot_transfer() function implicitly transfers one inode charge. With ea_inode feature, we would like to transfer multiple inode charges. Add get_inode_usage callback which can interrogate the total number of inodes that were charged for a given inode. [ Applied fix from Colin King to make sure the 'ret' variable is initialized on the successful return path. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1446616 ("Uninitialized scalar variable") --tytso] Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-06-22ext4: xattr inode deduplicationTahsin Erdogan6-290/+857
Ext4 now supports xattr values that are up to 64k in size (vfs limit). Large xattr values are stored in external inodes each one holding a single value. Once written the data blocks of these inodes are immutable. The real world use cases are expected to have a lot of value duplication such as inherited acls etc. To reduce data duplication on disk, this patch implements a deduplicator that allows sharing of xattr inodes. The deduplication is based on an in-memory hash lookup that is a best effort sharing scheme. When a xattr inode is read from disk (i.e. getxattr() call), its crc32c hash is added to a hash table. Before creating a new xattr inode for a value being set, the hash table is checked to see if an existing inode holds an identical value. If such an inode is found, the ref count on that inode is incremented. On value removal the ref count is decremented and if it reaches zero the inode is deleted. The quota charging for such inodes is manually managed. Every reference holder is charged the full size as if there was no sharing happening. This is consistent with how xattr blocks are also charged. [ Fixed up journal credits calculation to handle inline data and the rare case where an shared xattr block can get freed when two thread race on breaking the xattr block sharing. --tytso ] Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: cleanup transaction restarts during inode deletionTahsin Erdogan3-143/+184
During inode deletion, the number of journal credits that will be needed is hard to determine. For that reason we have journal extend/restart calls in several places. Whenever a transaction is restarted, filesystem must be in a consistent state because there is no atomicity guarantee beyond a restart call. Add ext4_xattr_ensure_credits() helper function which takes care of journal extend/restart logic. It also handles getting jbd2 write access and dirty metadata calls. This function is called at every iteration of handling an ea_inode reference. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: add ext4_is_quota_file()Tahsin Erdogan5-5/+7
IS_NOQUOTA() indicates whether quota is disabled for an inode. Ext4 also uses it to check whether an inode is for a quota file. The distinction currently doesn't matter because quota is disabled only for the quota files. When we start disabling quota for other inodes in the future, we will want to make the distinction clear. Replace IS_NOQUOTA() call with ext4_is_quota_file() at places where we are checking for quota files. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext2, ext4: make mb block cache names more explicitTahsin Erdogan3-44/+47
There will be a second mb_cache instance that tracks ea_inodes. Make existing names more explicit so that it is clear that they refer to xattr block cache. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22mbcache: make mbcache naming more genericTahsin Erdogan1-5/+5
Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series ("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_cache_entry.e_block field could be holding either a block number or an inode number. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: move struct ext4_xattr_inode_array to xattr.hTahsin Erdogan2-4/+5
Since this is a xattr specific data structure it is cleaner to keep it in xattr header file. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-22ext4: modify ext4_xattr_ino_array to hold struct inode *Tahsin Erdogan4-59/+53
Tracking struct inode * rather than the inode number eliminates the repeated ext4_xattr_inode_iget() call later. The second call cannot fail in practice but still requires explanation when it wants to ignore the return value. Avoid the trouble and make things simple. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: improve journal credit handling in set xattr pathsTahsin Erdogan5-32/+51
Both ext4_set_acl() and ext4_set_context() need to be made aware of ea_inode feature when it comes to credits calculation. Also add a sufficient credits check in ext4_xattr_set_handle() right after xattr write lock is grabbed. Original credits calculation is done outside the lock so there is a possiblity that the initially calculated credits are not sufficient anymore. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: ext4_xattr_delete_inode() should return accurate errorsTahsin Erdogan1-6/+10
In a few places the function returns without trying to pass the actual error code to the caller. Fix those. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: retry storing value in external inode with xattr block tooTahsin Erdogan1-17/+18
When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block. This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: fix credits calculation for xattr inodeTahsin Erdogan1-2/+1
When there is no space for a value in xattr block, it may be stored in an xattr inode even if the value length is less than EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(). So the current assumption in credits calculation is wrong. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: fix ext4_xattr_cmp()Tahsin Erdogan1-1/+2
When a xattr entry refers to an external inode, the value data is not available in the inline area so we should not attempt to read it using value offset. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: fix ext4_xattr_move_to_block()Tahsin Erdogan1-6/+13
When moving xattr entries from inline area to a xattr block, entries that refer to external xattr inodes need special handling because value data is not available in the inline area but rather should be read from its external inode. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: fix ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() value size calculationTahsin Erdogan1-5/+8
ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() is interested in calculating the inline space used in an inode. When a xattr entry refers to an external inode the value size indicates the external inode size, not the value size in the inline area. Change the function to take this into account. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: ext4_xattr_value_same() should return false for external dataTahsin Erdogan1-0/+3
ext4_xattr_value_same() is used as a quick optimization in case the new xattr value is identical to the previous value. When xattr value is stored in a xattr inode the check becomes expensive so it is better to just assume that they are not equal. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: add missing le32_to_cpu(e_value_inum) conversionsTahsin Erdogan1-4/+5
Two places in code missed converting xattr inode number using le32_to_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: clean up ext4_xattr_inode_get()Tahsin Erdogan1-22/+13
The input and output values of *size parameter are equal on successful return from ext4_xattr_inode_get(). On error return, the callers ignore the output value so there is no need to update it. Also check for NULL return from ext4_bread(). If the actual xattr inode size happens to be smaller than the expected size, ext4_bread() may return NULL which would indicate data corruption. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: change ext4_xattr_inode_iget() signatureTahsin Erdogan2-35/+40
In general, kernel functions indicate success/failure through their return values. This function returns the status as an output parameter and reserves the return value for the inode. Make it follow the general convention. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: extended attribute value size limit is enforced by vfsTahsin Erdogan1-6/+0
EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE definition in ext4 is currently unused. Besides, vfs enforces its own 64k limit which makes the 1MB limit in ext4 redundant. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: fix ref counting for ea_inodeTahsin Erdogan1-2/+1
The ref count on ea_inode is incremented by ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add() which is supposed to be decremented by ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(). The decrement is conditioned on whether the ea_inode is currently on the orphan list. However, the orphan list addition only happens when journaling is enabled. In non-journaled case,r we fail to release the ref count causing an error message like below. "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day..." Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: call journal revoke when freeing ea_inode blocksTahsin Erdogan2-2/+4
ea_inode contents are treated as metadata, that's why it is journaled during initial writes. Failing to call revoke during freeing could cause user data to be overwritten with original ea_inode contents during journal replay. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: ea_inode owner should be the same as the inode ownerTahsin Erdogan1-1/+2
Quota charging is based on the ownership of the inode. Currently, the xattr inode owner is set to the caller which may be different from the parent inode owner. This is inconsistent with how quota is charged for xattr block and regular data block writes. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: attach jinode after creation of xattr inodeTahsin Erdogan1-0/+6
In data=ordered mode jinode needs to be attached to the xattr inode when writing data to it. Attachment normally occurs during file open for regular files. Since we are not using file interface to write to the xattr inode, the jinode attach needs to be done manually. Otherwise the following crash occurs in data=ordered mode. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110 PGD 13b3c0067 P4D 13b3c0067 PUD 137660067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 PID: 1877 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #749 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff88010e368980 task.stack: ffffc90000374000 RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000377980 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880123b06230 RCX: 0000000000280000 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88012c8585d0 RBP: ffffc900003779b0 R08: 0000000000000202 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000400 R12: ffff8801111f81c0 R13: ffff88013b2b6800 R14: ffffc90000377ab0 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f0c99b77740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000136d91000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Call Trace: jbd2_journal_inode_add_write+0xe/0x10 ext4_map_blocks+0x59e/0x620 ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x501/0x7d0 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0 ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0 ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0 ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0 vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0 setxattr+0x12e/0x150 path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0 SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: do not set posix acls on xattr inodesTahsin Erdogan4-12/+18
We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly accessible from user mode. Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen below. ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- python/1894 is trying to acquire lock: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804878a6>] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270 but task is already holding lock: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&ei->xattr_sem); lock(&ei->xattr_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by python/1894: #0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d829f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50 #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803dda27>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0 #2: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x99 __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0 down_read+0x2f/0x60 ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270 ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0 get_acl+0x72/0xf0 posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170 ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0 __ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0 ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970 ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0 ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180 ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0 vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0 setxattr+0x129/0x160 path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0 SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: lock inode before calling ext4_orphan_add()Tahsin Erdogan1-0/+2
ext4_orphan_add() requires caller to be holding the inode lock. Add missing lock statements. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1806 at fs/ext4/namei.c:2731 ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240 CPU: 3 PID: 1806 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #746 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff880135d466c0 task.stack: ffffc900014b0000 RIP: 0010:ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240 RSP: 0018:ffffc900014b3d50 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801348fe1f0 RCX: ffffc900014b3c64 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801348fe1f0 RDI: ffff8801348fe1f0 RBP: ffffc900014b3da0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff80e82025 R10: 0000000000004692 R11: 000000000000468d R12: ffff880137598000 R13: ffff880137217000 R14: ffff880134ac58d0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fc50f09e740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000008bc2e0 CR3: 00000001375ac000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Call Trace: ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add.constprop.19+0x9d/0xf0 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x1c4/0x2f0 ext4_evict_inode+0x15a/0x7f0 evict+0xc0/0x1a0 iput+0x16a/0x270 do_unlinkat+0x172/0x290 SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-21ext4: fix lockdep warning about recursive inode lockingTahsin Erdogan3-0/+16
Setting a large xattr value may require writing the attribute contents to an external inode. In this case we may need to lock the xattr inode along with the parent inode. This doesn't pose a deadlock risk because xattr inodes are not directly visible to the user and their access is restricted. Assign a lockdep subclass to xattr inode's lock. ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- python/1822 is trying to acquire lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff804912ca>] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0 but task is already holding lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by python/1822: #0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d0eef>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50 #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0 #2: (jbd2_handle){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80493f40>] start_this_handle+0xf0/0x420 #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804920ba>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x9a/0x4f0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1822 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x9e __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1750 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0 down_write+0x2c/0x60 ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0 ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0 ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0 ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0 vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0 setxattr+0x12e/0x150 path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0 SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>