summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-08-12cpufreq: dt: Use .register_em() to register with energy modelViresh Kumar1-2/+1
Set the newly added .register_em() callback with cpufreq_register_em_with_opp() to register with the EM core. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-03-25cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() may return -EPROBE_DEFERQuanyang Wang1-2/+7
The function dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() may return -EPROBE_DEFER, which needs to be propagated to the caller to try probing the driver later on. Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com> [ Viresh: Massage changelog/subject, improve code. ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-02-04cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flagViresh Kumar1-1/+1
During cpufreq driver's registration, if the ->init() callback for all the CPUs fail then there is not much point in keeping the driver around as it will only account for more of unnecessary noise, for example cpufreq core will try to suspend/resume the driver which never got registered properly. The removal of such a driver is avoided if the driver carries the CPUFREQ_STICKY flag. This was added way back [1] in 2004 and perhaps no one should ever need it now. A lot of drivers do set this flag, probably because they just copied it from other drivers. This was added earlier for some platforms [2] because their cpufreq drivers were getting registered before the CPUs were registered with subsys framework. And hence they used to fail. The same isn't true anymore though. The current code flow in the kernel is: start_kernel() -> kernel_init() -> kernel_init_freeable() -> do_basic_setup() -> driver_init() -> cpu_dev_init() -> subsys_system_register() //For CPUs -> do_initcalls() -> cpufreq_register_driver() Clearly, the CPUs will always get registered with subsys framework before any cpufreq driver can get probed. Remove the flag and update the relevant drivers. Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/include/linux/cpufreq.h?id=7cc9f0d9a1ab04cedc60d64fd8dcf7df224a3b4d # [1] Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1100.c?id=f59d3bbe35f6268d729f51be82af8325d62f20f5 # [2] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-09cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() accepts NULL argumentViresh Kumar1-4/+2
The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-12-09cpufreq: dt: Don't (ab)use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to create OPP tableViresh Kumar1-89/+68
Initially, the helper dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() was supposed to be used only for the OPP core's internal use (it tries to find an existing OPP table and if it doesn't find one, then it allocates the OPP table). Sometime back, the cpufreq-dt driver started using it to make sure all the relevant resources required by the OPP core are available earlier during initialization process to properly propagate -EPROBE_DEFER. It worked but it also abused the API to create an OPP table, which should be created with the help of other helpers provided by the OPP core. The OPP core will be updated in a later commit to limit the scope of dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to only finding an existing OPP table and not create one. This commit updates the cpufreq-dt driver before that happens. Now the cpufreq-dt driver creates the OPP and cpufreq tables for all the CPUs from driver's init callback itself. Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-10-06Merge branch 'cpufreq/arm/linux-next' of ↵Rafael J. Wysocki1-143/+143
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm Pull ARM cpufreq updates for 5.10-rc1 from Viresh Kumar: "- STI cpufreq driver updates to allow new hardware (Alain Volmat). - Minor tegra driver fixes around initial frequency mismatch warnings (Jon Hunter). - dev_err simplification for s5pv210 driver (Krzysztof Kozlowski). - Qcom driver updates to allow new hardware and minor cleanup (Manivannan Sadhasivam and Matthias Kaehlcke). - Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for armada driver (Pali Rohár). - Improved defer-probe handling in cpufreq-dt driver (Stephan Gerhold). - Call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() unconditionally for imx driver (Viresh Kumar)." * 'cpufreq/arm/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm: cpufreq: qcom: Don't add frequencies without an OPP cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add cpufreq support for SM8250 SoC cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use of_device_get_match_data for offsets and row size cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Document Qcom EPSS compatible cpufreq: qcom-hw: Make use of cpufreq driver_data for passing pdev cpufreq: armada-37xx: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE cpufreq: arm: Kconfig: add CPUFREQ_DT depend for STI CPUFREQ cpufreq: dt-platdev: Blacklist st,stih418 SoC cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: add stih418 support cpufreq: s5pv210: Use dev_err instead of pr_err in probe cpufreq: s5pv210: Simplify with dev_err_probe() cpufreq: tegra186: Fix initial frequency cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in _of_add_opp_table_v1() cpufreq: imx6q: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
2020-09-18cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq coreIonela Voinescu1-9/+1
To properly scale its per-entity load-tracking signals, the task scheduler needs to be given a frequency scale factor, i.e. some image of the current frequency the CPU is running at. Currently, this scale can be computed either by using counters (APERF/MPERF on x86, AMU on arm64), or by piggy-backing on the frequency selection done by cpufreq. For the latter, drivers have to explicitly set the scale factor themselves, despite it being purely boiler-plate code: the required information depends entirely on the kind of frequency switch callback implemented by the driver, i.e. either of: target_index(), target(), fast_switch() and setpolicy(). The fitness of those callbacks with regard to driving the Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is studied below: target_index() ============== Documentation states that the chosen frequency "must be determined by freq_table[index].frequency". It isn't clear if it *has* to be that frequency, or if it can use that frequency value to do some computation that ultimately leads to a different frequency selection. All drivers go for the former, while the vexpress-spc-cpufreq has an atypical implementation which is handled separately. Therefore, the hook works on the assumption the core can use freq_table[index].frequency. target() ======= This has been flagged as deprecated since: commit 9c0ebcf78fde ("cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine") It also doesn't have that many users: gx-suspmod.c:439: .target = cpufreq_gx_target, s3c24xx-cpufreq.c:428: .target = s3c_cpufreq_target, intel_pstate.c:2528: .target = intel_cpufreq_target, cppc_cpufreq.c:401: .target = cppc_cpufreq_set_target, cpufreq-nforce2.c:371: .target = nforce2_target, sh-cpufreq.c:163: .target = sh_cpufreq_target, pcc-cpufreq.c:573: .target = pcc_cpufreq_target, Similarly to the path taken for target_index() calls in the cpufreq core during a frequency change, all of the drivers above will mark the end of a frequency change by a call to cpufreq_freq_transition_end(). Therefore, cpufreq_freq_transition_end() can be used as the location for the arch_set_freq_scale() call to potentially inform the scheduler of the frequency change. This change maintains the previous functionality for the drivers that implement the target_index() callback, while also adding support for the few drivers that implement the deprecated target() callback. fast_switch() ============= This callback *has* to return the frequency that was selected. setpolicy() =========== This callback does not have any designated way of informing what was the end choice. But there are only two drivers using setpolicy(), and none of them have current FIE support: drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c:281: .setpolicy = longrun_set_policy, drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:2215: .setpolicy = intel_pstate_set_policy, The intel_pstate is known to use counter-driven frequency invariance. Conclusion ========== Given that the significant majority of current FIE enabled drivers use callbacks that lend themselves to triggering the setting of the FIE scale factor in a generic way, move the invariance setter calls to cpufreq core. As a result of setting the frequency scale factor in cpufreq core, after callbacks that lend themselves to trigger it, remove this functionality from the driver side. To be noted that despite marking a successful frequency change, many cpufreq drivers will consider the new frequency as the requested frequency, although this is might not be the one granted by the hardware. Therefore, the call to arch_set_freq_scale() is a "best effort" one, and it is up to the architecture if the new frequency is used in the new frequency scale factor setting (determined by the implementation of arch_set_freq_scale()) or eventually used by the scheduler (determined by the implementation of arch_scale_freq_capacity()). The architecture is in a better position to decide if it has better methods to obtain more accurate information regarding the current frequency and use that information instead (for example, the use of counters). Also, the implementation to arch_set_freq_scale() will now have to handle error conditions (current frequency == 0) in order to prevent the overhead in cpufreq core when the default arch_set_freq_scale() implementation is used. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-09-16cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properlyStephan Gerhold1-143/+143
cpufreq-dt is currently unable to handle -EPROBE_DEFER properly because the error code is not propagated for the cpufreq_driver->init() callback. Instead, it attempts to avoid the situation by temporarily requesting all resources within resources_available() and releasing them again immediately after. This has several disadvantages: - Whenever we add something like interconnect handling to the OPP core we need to patch cpufreq-dt to request these resources early. - resources_available() is only run for CPU0, but other clusters may eventually depend on other resources that are not available yet. (See FIXME comment removed by this commit...) - All resources need to be looked up several times. Now that the OPP core can propagate -EPROBE_DEFER during initialization, it would be nice to avoid all that trouble and just propagate its error code when necessary. This commit refactors the cpufreq-dt driver to initialize private_data before registering the cpufreq driver. We do this by iterating over all possible CPUs and ensure that all resources are initialized: 1. dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() ensures the OPP table is allocated and initialized with clock and interconnects. 2. dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() requests the regulators and assigns them to the OPP table. 3. We call dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() early so that we only initialize the OPP table once for each shared policy. With these changes, we actually end up saving a few lines of code, the resources are no longer looked up multiple times and everything should be much more robust. Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> [ Viresh: Use list_head structure for maintaining the list and minor changes ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-06-24OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related driversLukasz Luba1-1/+1
The Energy Model framework supports not only CPU devices. Drop the CPU specific interface with cpumask and add struct device. Add also a return value, user might use it. This new interface provides easy way to create a simple Energy Model, which then might be used by e.g. thermal subsystem. Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-05-29cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scalingGeorgi Djakov1-0/+4
In addition to clocks and regulators, some devices can scale the bandwidth of their on-chip interconnect - for example between CPU and DDR memory. Add support for that, so that platforms which support it can make use of it. Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> [ Viresh: Reused dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(). Also drop the depends on from Kconfig. ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> fixup! cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scaling
2020-03-12cpufreq: dt: Allow platform specific intermediate callbacksPeng Fan1-0/+4
Platforms may need to implement platform specific get_intermediate and target_intermediate hooks. Update cpufreq-dt driver's platform data to contain those for such platforms. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500Thomas Gleixner1-4/+1
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-03-04Merge branch 'pm-opp'Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+2
* pm-opp: cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
2019-02-12cpufreq: dt: Implement online/offline() callbacksViresh Kumar1-0/+17
Implement the light-weight tear down and bring up helpers to reduce the amount of work to do on CPU offline/online operation. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-07cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy ModelQuentin Perret1-0/+2
Now that PM_OPP provides a helper function to estimate the power consumed by CPUs, make sure to try and register an Energy Model (EM) from cpufreq-dt, hence ensuring interested subsystems (the task scheduler, for example) can make use of that information when available. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-01-30cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling deviceAmit Kucheria1-12/+2
Use the CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to automatically register as a thermal cooling device. This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-10-04cpufreq: dt: Try freeing static OPPs only if we have added themViresh Kumar1-15/+19
We can not call dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() freely anymore since the latest OPP core updates as that uses reference counting to free resources. There are cases where no static OPPs are added (using DT) for a platform and trying to remove the OPP table may end up decrementing refcount which is already zero and hence generating warnings. Lets track if we were able to add static OPPs or not and then only remove the table based on that. Some reshuffling of code is also done to do that. Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-05-10cpufreq: dt: Allow platform specific suspend/resume callbacksViresh Kumar1-2/+8
Platforms may need to implement platform specific suspend/resume hooks. Update cpufreq-dt driver's platform data to contain those for such platforms. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-7/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from cpufreq-dt driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-12-07cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helperViresh Kumar1-1/+1
of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be removed, but then we would be left with two routines: cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that would look odd. Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-12-07cpu_cooling: Make of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() parse DTViresh Kumar1-26/+1
All the callers of of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() have almost identical code and it makes more sense to move that code into the helper as its all about reading DT properties. This got rid of lot of redundant code. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-03cpufreq: dt: invoke frequency-invariance setter functionDietmar Eggemann1-2/+10
Call the frequency-invariance setter function arch_set_freq_scale() if the new frequency has been successfully set which is indicated by dev_pm_opp_set_rate() returning 0. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-08-01cpufreq: Process remote callbacks from any CPU if the platform permitsViresh Kumar1-0/+1
On many platforms, CPUs can do DVFS across cpufreq policies. i.e CPU from policy-A can change frequency of CPUs belonging to policy-B. This is quite common in case of ARM platforms where we don't configure any per-cpu register. Add a flag to identify such platforms and update cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs() to allow remote callbacks if this flag is set. Also enable the flag for cpufreq-dt driver which is used only on ARM platforms currently. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-27thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling deviceViresh Kumar1-1/+1
The CPU cooling driver uses the cpufreq policy, to get clip_cpus, the frequency table, etc. Most of the callers of CPU cooling driver's registration routines have the cpufreq policy with them, but they only pass the policy->related_cpus cpumask. The __cpufreq_cooling_register() routine then gets the policy by itself and uses it. It would be much better if the callers can pass the policy instead directly. This also fixes a basic design flaw, where the policy can be freed while the CPU cooling driver is still active. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
2017-01-27PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rateViresh Kumar1-6/+1
There is only one user of dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and that uses it to get the OPP rate for the suspend_opp. Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() as dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq() and return the rate directly from it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-06PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulatorsViresh Kumar1-3/+3
This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-11-30PM / OPP: Pass opp_table to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()Stephen Boyd1-4/+8
Joonyoung Shim reported an interesting problem on his ARM octa-core Odoroid-XU3 platform. During system suspend, dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() was failing for a struct device for which dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() is called earlier. This happened because an earlier call to dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() function (from cpufreq-dt.c file) removed all the entries from opp_table->dev_list apart from the last CPU device in the cpumask of CPUs sharing the OPP. But both dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() routines get CPU device for the first CPU in the cpumask. And so the OPP core failed to find the OPP table for the struct device. This patch attempts to fix this problem by returning a pointer to the opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and using that as the parameter to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(). This ensures that the dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() doesn't fail to find the opp table. Note that similar design problem also exists with other dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs, but those aren't used currently by anyone and so we don't need to update them for now. Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+ Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ Viresh: Wrote commit log and tested on exynos 5250 ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-13cpufreq: dt: Support governor tunables per policyViresh Kumar1-0/+6
The cpufreq-dt driver is also used for systems with multiple clock/voltage domains for CPUs, i.e. multiple cpufreq policies in a system. And in such cases the platform users may want to enable "governor tunables per policy". Support that via platform data, as not all users of the driver would want that behavior. Reported-by: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-13cpufreq: dt: Remove unused codeViresh Kumar1-2/+0
This is leftover from an earlier patch which removed the usage of platform data but forgot to remove this line. Remove it now. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-28cpufreq: dt: Kill platform-dataViresh Kumar1-5/+1
There are no more users of platform-data for cpufreq-dt driver, get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-28cpufreq: dt: Identify cpu-sharing for platforms without operating-points-v2Viresh Kumar1-7/+9
Existing platforms, which do not support operating-points-v2, can explicitly tell the opp core that some of the CPUs share opp tables, with help of dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(). For such platforms, explicitly ask the opp core to provide list of CPUs sharing the opp table with current cpu device, before falling back to platform data. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-05cpufreq: dt: Drop stale commentViresh Kumar1-3/+0
The comment in file header doesn't hold true anymore, drop it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: No need to allocate resources anymoreViresh Kumar1-67/+45
OPP layer manages it now and cpufreq-dt driver doesn't need it. But, we still need to check for availability of resources for deferred probing. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: No need to fetch voltage-toleranceViresh Kumar1-23/+23
Its already done by core and we don't need to get it anymore. And so, we don't need to get of node in cpufreq_init() anymore, move that to find_supply_name() instead. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: Use dev_pm_opp_set_rate() to switch frequencyViresh Kumar1-71/+2
OPP core supports frequency/voltage changes based on the target frequency now, use that instead of open coding the same in cpufreq-dt driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: Reuse dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency()Viresh Kumar1-44/+4
OPP layer has all the information now to calculate transition latency (clock_latency + voltage_latency). Lets reuse the OPP layer helper dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency() instead of open coding the same in cpufreq-dt driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: Unsupported OPPs are already disabledViresh Kumar1-2/+0
The core already have a valid regulator set for the device opp and the unsupported OPPs are already disabled by the core. There is no need to repeat that in the user drivers, get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: Pass regulator name to the OPP coreViresh Kumar1-0/+46
OPP core can handle the regulators by itself, and but it needs to know the name of the regulator to fetch. Add support for that. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: OPP layers handles clock-latency for V1 bindings as wellViresh Kumar1-4/+1
"clock-latency" is handled by OPP layer for all bindings and so there is no need to make special calls for V1 bindings. Use dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency() for both the cases. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: Rename 'need_update' to 'opp_v1'Viresh Kumar1-3/+3
That's the real purpose of this field, i.e. to take special care of old OPP V1 bindings. Lets name it accordingly, so that it can be used elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-11cpufreq: dt: Convert few pr_debug/err() calls to dev_dbg/err()Viresh Kumar1-2/+2
We have the device structure available now, lets use it for better print messages. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-27cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: avoid uninitialized variable warnings:Arnd Bergmann1-8/+7
gcc warns quite a bit about values returned from allocate_resources() in cpufreq-dt.c: cpufreq-dt.c: In function 'cpufreq_init': cpufreq-dt.c:327:6: error: 'cpu_dev' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] cpufreq-dt.c:197:17: note: 'cpu_dev' was declared here cpufreq-dt.c:376:2: error: 'cpu_clk' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] cpufreq-dt.c:199:14: note: 'cpu_clk' was declared here cpufreq-dt.c: In function 'dt_cpufreq_probe': cpufreq-dt.c:461:2: error: 'cpu_clk' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] cpufreq-dt.c:447:14: note: 'cpu_clk' was declared here The problem is that it's slightly hard for gcc to follow return codes across PTR_ERR() calls. This patch uses explicit assignments to the "ret" variable to make it easier for gcc to verify that the code is actually correct, without the need to add a bogus initialization. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-05cpufreq-dt: fix handling regulator_get_voltage() resultAndrzej Hajda1-2/+3
The function can return negative values so it should be assigned to signed type. The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci. Link: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576 Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-12-10cpufreq-dt: Supply power coefficient when registering cooling devicesPunit Agrawal1-2/+7
Support registering cooling devices with dynamic power coefficient where provided by the device tree. This allows OF registered cooling devices driver to be used with the power_allocator thermal governor. Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-15PM / OPP: Prefix exported opp routines with dev_pm_opp_Viresh Kumar1-5/+5
That's the naming convention followed in most of opp core, but few routines didn't follow this, fix them. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-15PM / OPP: Rename opp init/free table routinesViresh Kumar1-3/+3
free-table routines are opposite of init-table ones, and must be named to make that clear. Opposite of 'init' is 'exit', but those doesn't suit really well. Replace 'init' with 'add' and 'free' with 'remove'. Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-09cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency supportBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz1-0/+9
Add suspend frequency support and if needed set it to the frequency obtained from the suspend opp (can be defined using opp-v2 bindings and is optional). Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-03cpufreq: dt: Tolerance applies on both sides of target voltageViresh Kumar1-1/+2
Tolerance applies on both sides of the target voltage, i.e. both min and max sides. But while checking if a voltage is supported by the regulator or not, we haven't taken care of tolerance on the lower side. Fix that. Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Fixes: 045ee45c4ff2 ("cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: disable unsupported OPPs") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-03cpufreq: dt: Print error on failing to mark OPPs as sharedViresh Kumar1-1/+4
We need to explicitly mark OPPs as shared, when they are not defined with OPP-v2 bindings. This operation can potentially fail, and in that case we should at least print an error message. Fixes: 2e02d8723edf ("cpufreq: dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-03cpufreq: dt: Check OPP count before marking them sharedViresh Kumar1-11/+11
We need to explicitly mark OPPs as shared, when they are not defined with OPP-v2 bindings. But this isn't required to be done if we failed to initialize OPP table. Reorder code to verify OPP count before marking them shared. Fixes: 2e02d8723edf ("cpufreq: dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-03 19:52:15 +0000