summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>2024-07-05 17:32:03 +0200
committerChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>2024-07-09 12:40:04 +0200
commitda966b82bf3d16f89a05732c933a589ec798d3f7 (patch)
treed9319f0a5da5ef409d54a4ca4fe883a6aeeaa044 /drivers/gpu/drm/ttm
parent4c44f89c5daee9540cb7428de5d835bd00951350 (diff)
drm/ttm: Provide a generic LRU walker helper
Provide a generic LRU walker in TTM, in the spirit of drm_gem_lru_scan() but building on the restartable TTM LRU functionality. The LRU walker optionally supports locking objects as part of a ww mutex locking transaction, to mimic to some extent the current functionality in ttm. However any -EDEADLK return is converted to -ENOSPC and then to -ENOMEM before reaching the driver, so that the driver will need to backoff and possibly retry without being able to keep the ticket. v3: - Move the helper to core ttm. - Remove the drm_exec usage from it for now, it will be reintroduced later in the series. v4: - Handle the -EALREADY case if ticketlocking. v6: - Some cleanup and added code comments (Matthew Brost) - Clarified the ticketlock in the commit message (Matthew Brost) v7: - Use s64 rather than long for the target and progress (Christian König) - Update documentation to not encourage using pages as a progress measure. (Christian König) - Remove cond_resched(). (Christian König) Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> #v6 Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240705153206.68526-6-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/ttm')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c151
1 files changed, 151 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
index 0b3f4267130c..c2759add58f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
@@ -768,3 +768,154 @@ error_destroy_tt:
ttm_tt_destroy(bo->bdev, ttm);
return ret;
}
+
+static bool ttm_lru_walk_trylock(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+ bool *needs_unlock)
+{
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx = walk->ctx;
+
+ *needs_unlock = false;
+
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv)) {
+ *needs_unlock = true;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ if (bo->base.resv == ctx->resv && ctx->allow_res_evict) {
+ dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int ttm_lru_walk_ticketlock(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+ bool *needs_unlock)
+{
+ struct dma_resv *resv = bo->base.resv;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (walk->ctx->interruptible)
+ ret = dma_resv_lock_interruptible(resv, walk->ticket);
+ else
+ ret = dma_resv_lock(resv, walk->ticket);
+
+ if (!ret) {
+ *needs_unlock = true;
+ /*
+ * Only a single ticketlock per loop. Ticketlocks are prone
+ * to return -EDEADLK causing the eviction to fail, so
+ * after waiting for the ticketlock, revert back to
+ * trylocking for this walk.
+ */
+ walk->ticket = NULL;
+ } else if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
+ /* Caller needs to exit the ww transaction. */
+ ret = -ENOSPC;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void ttm_lru_walk_unlock(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool locked)
+{
+ if (locked)
+ dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+}
+
+/**
+ * ttm_lru_walk_for_evict() - Perform a LRU list walk, with actions taken on
+ * valid items.
+ * @walk: describe the walks and actions taken
+ * @bdev: The TTM device.
+ * @man: The struct ttm_resource manager whose LRU lists we're walking.
+ * @target: The end condition for the walk.
+ *
+ * The LRU lists of @man are walk, and for each struct ttm_resource encountered,
+ * the corresponding ttm_buffer_object is locked and taken a reference on, and
+ * the LRU lock is dropped. the LRU lock may be dropped before locking and, in
+ * that case, it's verified that the item actually remains on the LRU list after
+ * the lock, and that the buffer object didn't switch resource in between.
+ *
+ * With a locked object, the actions indicated by @walk->process_bo are
+ * performed, and after that, the bo is unlocked, the refcount dropped and the
+ * next struct ttm_resource is processed. Here, the walker relies on
+ * TTM's restartable LRU list implementation.
+ *
+ * Typically @walk->process_bo() would return the number of pages evicted,
+ * swapped or shrunken, so that when the total exceeds @target, or when the
+ * LRU list has been walked in full, iteration is terminated. It's also terminated
+ * on error. Note that the definition of @target is done by the caller, it
+ * could have a different meaning than the number of pages.
+ *
+ * Note that the way dma_resv individualization is done, locking needs to be done
+ * either with the LRU lock held (trylocking only) or with a reference on the
+ * object.
+ *
+ * Return: The progress made towards target or negative error code on error.
+ */
+s64 ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_device *bdev,
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man, s64 target)
+{
+ struct ttm_resource_cursor cursor;
+ struct ttm_resource *res;
+ s64 progress = 0;
+ s64 lret;
+
+ spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res(man, &cursor, res) {
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
+ bool bo_needs_unlock = false;
+ bool bo_locked = false;
+ int mem_type;
+
+ /*
+ * Attempt a trylock before taking a reference on the bo,
+ * since if we do it the other way around, and the trylock fails,
+ * we need to drop the lru lock to put the bo.
+ */
+ if (ttm_lru_walk_trylock(walk, bo, &bo_needs_unlock))
+ bo_locked = true;
+ else if (!walk->ticket || walk->ctx->no_wait_gpu ||
+ walk->trylock_only)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(bo)) {
+ ttm_lru_walk_unlock(bo, bo_needs_unlock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ mem_type = res->mem_type;
+ spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+
+ lret = 0;
+ if (!bo_locked)
+ lret = ttm_lru_walk_ticketlock(walk, bo, &bo_needs_unlock);
+
+ /*
+ * Note that in between the release of the lru lock and the
+ * ticketlock, the bo may have switched resource,
+ * and also memory type, since the resource may have been
+ * freed and allocated again with a different memory type.
+ * In that case, just skip it.
+ */
+ if (!lret && bo->resource && bo->resource->mem_type == mem_type)
+ lret = walk->ops->process_bo(walk, bo);
+
+ ttm_lru_walk_unlock(bo, bo_needs_unlock);
+ ttm_bo_put(bo);
+ if (lret == -EBUSY || lret == -EALREADY)
+ lret = 0;
+ progress = (lret < 0) ? lret : progress + lret;
+
+ spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ if (progress < 0 || progress >= target)
+ break;
+ }
+ ttm_resource_cursor_fini_locked(&cursor);
+ spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+
+ return progress;
+}