PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency framework

The special value of 0 for device resume latency PM QoS means
"no restriction", but there are two problems with that.

First, device resume latency PM QoS requests with 0 as the
value are always put in front of requests with positive
values in the priority lists used internally by the PM QoS
framework, causing 0 to be chosen as an effective constraint
value.  However, that 0 is then interpreted as "no restriction"
effectively overriding the other requests with specific
restrictions which is incorrect.

Second, the users of device resume latency PM QoS have no
way to specify that *any* resume latency at all should be
avoided, which is an artificial limitation in general.

To address these issues, modify device resume latency PM QoS to
use S32_MAX as the "no constraint" value and 0 as the "no
latency at all" one and rework its users (the cpuidle menu
governor, the genpd QoS governor and the runtime PM framework)
to follow these changes.

Also add a special "n/a" value to the corresponding user space I/F
to allow user space to indicate that it cannot accept any resume
latencies at all for the given device.

Fixes: 85dc0b8a4019 (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197323
Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index 321cd7b4d817..227bac5f1191 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
 
 	per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev;
 	register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
-	dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev, 0);
+	dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev,
+					PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT);
 
 	return 0;
 }