From 289dec5b895a7ecefb2f49da109e6aed9b0f1754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:42:56 -0400 Subject: ufs: more deadlock prevention on tail unpacking ->s_lock is not needed for ufs_change_blocknr() Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ufs/balloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c index d56d9bc705fe..0315fea1d589 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment, if (result) { ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount, locked_page != NULL); + mutex_unlock(&UFS_SB(sb)->s_lock); ufs_change_blocknr(inode, fragment - oldcount, oldcount, uspi->s_sbbase + tmp, uspi->s_sbbase + result, locked_page); @@ -487,7 +488,6 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max(UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count); write_sequnlock(&UFS_I(inode)->meta_lock); - mutex_unlock(&UFS_SB(sb)->s_lock); if (newcount < request) ufs_free_fragments (inode, result + newcount, request - newcount); ufs_free_fragments (inode, tmp, oldcount); -- cgit v1.2.3