summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEvan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>2013-05-02 02:07:32 +0000
committerEvan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>2013-05-02 02:07:32 +0000
commitd4201b6e76bad9cb3fb8a20e3c04555d97deb0fd (patch)
tree4f4f1e364b7fd345230abce60da7956e91d00e82
parentf9a5e7e4e9ca91111b15d97fe7461c9061931ff7 (diff)
TiedTo flag can now be placed on implicit operands. isTwoAddrUse() should look
at all of the operands. Previously it was skipping over implicit operands which cause infinite looping when the two-address pass try to reschedule a two-address instruction below the kill of tied operand. I'm unable to come up with a reasonably sized test case. rdar://13747577 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180906 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp8
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
index 3614bdb7bb..7ca2beef65 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ STATISTIC(NumReSchedDowns, "Number of instructions re-scheduled down");
// Temporary flag to disable rescheduling.
static cl::opt<bool>
EnableRescheduling("twoaddr-reschedule",
- cl::desc("Coalesce copies by rescheduling (default=true)"), cl::init(true), cl::Hidden);
+ cl::desc("Coalesce copies by rescheduling (default=true)"),
+ cl::init(true), cl::Hidden);
namespace {
class TwoAddressInstructionPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
@@ -432,10 +433,7 @@ static bool isKilled(MachineInstr &MI, unsigned Reg,
/// isTwoAddrUse - Return true if the specified MI uses the specified register
/// as a two-address use. If so, return the destination register by reference.
static bool isTwoAddrUse(MachineInstr &MI, unsigned Reg, unsigned &DstReg) {
- const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI.getDesc();
- unsigned NumOps = MI.isInlineAsm()
- ? MI.getNumOperands() : MCID.getNumOperands();
- for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumOps; ++i) {
+ for (unsigned i = 0, NumOps = MI.getNumOperands(); i != NumOps; ++i) {
const MachineOperand &MO = MI.getOperand(i);
if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isUse() || MO.getReg() != Reg)
continue;