summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlex Goins <agoins@nvidia.com>2018-01-08 18:44:25 -0800
committerAdam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>2018-02-12 14:52:58 -0500
commit61d3f56877b23241757490efcdb759b905caca1d (patch)
tree1ae0ce26f3001573478d176d0dd023e03cfa44d1
parentcb908a7840487e4b81aa16c5b3a4b609ff1153fc (diff)
randr: Fix rotation check in ProcRRSetScreenSize()
ProcRRSetScreenSize() does bounds checking to ensure that none of the CRTCs have a viewport that extends beyond the new screen size. In doing so, it accounts for if the CRTC is rotated 90 or 270 degrees, swapping width and height. However, it does so by testing if crtc->rotation is equal to RR_Rotate_90 or RR_Rotate_270. crtc->rotation is a bit mask, and it includes reflection as well as rotation. If a CRTC is reflected as well as rotated, it will incorrectly fail this test, resulting in incorrect dimensions being used to verify the validity of the new screen size. In some cases, this can cause valid uses of ProcRRSetScreenSize() to fail with BadMatch. This patch fixes the issue by testing that the bits RR_Rotate_90 or RR_Rotate_270 are set, rather than testing for equality. Signed-off-by: Alex Goins <agoins@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 6b26a7bda9efa93440734ede0382a3e9a6761365)
-rw-r--r--randr/rrscreen.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/randr/rrscreen.c b/randr/rrscreen.c
index 0c70b28dd..d059ce74a 100644
--- a/randr/rrscreen.c
+++ b/randr/rrscreen.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ ProcRRSetScreenSize(ClientPtr client)
int source_height = mode->mode.height;
Rotation rotation = crtc->rotation;
- if (rotation == RR_Rotate_90 || rotation == RR_Rotate_270) {
+ if (rotation & (RR_Rotate_90 | RR_Rotate_270)) {
source_width = mode->mode.height;
source_height = mode->mode.width;
}