summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>2012-09-03 12:17:48 +0200
committerGerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>2012-09-05 17:12:00 +0200
commit6a21f20a622b14262bde105f766c97f16be0657e (patch)
tree1778b4457738ed405692a24134737a66a0a3f7dd
parentd6b13babe2fa2494a477139742e312df03d0e13c (diff)
ehci: Correct a comment in fetchqtd packet processing
Since my previous comment said "Should never happen", I tried changing the next line to an assert(0), which did not go well, which as the new comments explains is logical if you think about it for a moment. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
index 253439420..2f3e9c03a 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
@@ -2045,7 +2045,10 @@ static int ehci_state_fetchqtd(EHCIQueue *q)
ehci_set_state(q->ehci, q->async, EST_HORIZONTALQH);
break;
case EHCI_ASYNC_FINISHED:
- /* Should never happen, as this case is caught by fetchqh */
+ /*
+ * We get here when advqueue moves to a packet which is already
+ * finished, which can happen with packets queued up by fill_queue
+ */
ehci_set_state(q->ehci, q->async, EST_EXECUTING);
break;
}