i965/fs: Don't let the EOT send message interfere with the MRF hack

Previously, we just put the message for the EOT send as high in the file as
it would go.  This is because the register pre-filling hardware will stop
all over the early registers in the file in preparation for the next thread
while you're still sending the last message.  However, if something happens
to spill, then the MRF hack interferes with the EOT send message and, if
things aren't scheduled nicely, will stomp on it.

Cc: "10.5 10.6" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90520
Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 86e5afbfee5492235cab1a7be4ea49ac02be1644)
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
	src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp

2 files changed, 17 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
index bf8bb0b734..daf8d662dc 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
@@ -435,7 +435,8 @@ public:
    void setup_payload_interference(struct ra_graph *g, int payload_reg_count,
                                    int first_payload_node);
    void setup_mrf_hack_interference(struct ra_graph *g,
-                                    int first_mrf_hack_node);
+                                    int first_mrf_hack_node,
+                                    int *first_used_mrf);
    int choose_spill_reg(struct ra_graph *g);
    void spill_reg(int spill_reg);
    void split_virtual_grfs();
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp
index bcd657b217..f9fd405173 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp
@@ -498,11 +498,13 @@ fs_visitor::get_used_mrfs(bool *mrf_used)
  * messages (treated as MRFs in code generation).
  */
 void
-fs_visitor::setup_mrf_hack_interference(struct ra_graph *g, int first_mrf_node)
+fs_visitor::setup_mrf_hack_interference(struct ra_graph *g, int first_mrf_node,
+                                        int *first_used_mrf)
 {
    bool mrf_used[BRW_MAX_MRF];
    get_used_mrfs(mrf_used);
 
+   *first_used_mrf = BRW_MAX_MRF;
    for (int i = 0; i < BRW_MAX_MRF; i++) {
       /* Mark each MRF reg node as being allocated to its physical register.
        *
@@ -515,6 +517,9 @@ fs_visitor::setup_mrf_hack_interference(struct ra_graph *g, int first_mrf_node)
        * that are used as conflicting with all virtual GRFs.
        */
       if (mrf_used[i]) {
+         if (i < *first_used_mrf)
+            *first_used_mrf = i;
+
          for (int j = 0; j < this->virtual_grf_count; j++) {
             ra_add_node_interference(g, first_mrf_node + i, j);
          }
@@ -581,7 +586,8 @@ fs_visitor::assign_regs(bool allow_spilling)
 
    setup_payload_interference(g, payload_node_count, first_payload_node);
    if (brw->gen >= 7) {
-      setup_mrf_hack_interference(g, first_mrf_hack_node);
+      int first_used_mrf = BRW_MAX_MRF;
+      setup_mrf_hack_interference(g, first_mrf_hack_node, &first_used_mrf);
 
       foreach_block_and_inst(block, fs_inst, inst, cfg) {
          /* When we do send-from-GRF for FB writes, we need to ensure that
@@ -597,6 +603,13 @@ fs_visitor::assign_regs(bool allow_spilling)
          if (inst->eot) {
             int size = virtual_grf_sizes[inst->src[0].reg];
             int reg = screen->wm_reg_sets[rsi].class_to_ra_reg_range[size] - 1;
+
+            /* If something happened to spill, we want to push the EOT send
+             * register early enough in the register file that we don't
+             * conflict with any used MRF hack registers.
+             */
+            reg -= BRW_MAX_MRF - first_used_mrf;
+
             ra_set_node_reg(g, inst->src[0].reg, reg);
             break;
          }